LIDOCRIT : Effect of Continuous Intravenous LIDOcaine on Discomfort in Postoperative CRITical Care Inpatients

NCT ID: NCT07043023

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

246 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although pain management in intensive care units and intensive care units has improved since the DOLOREA study, research into therapies and techniques to optimise analgesia is still needed. The many adverse effects of morphine are well known, and it has been observed that excessive sedation during the first 48 hours is associated with an increase in mortality and length of stay. Multimodal analgesia protocols, preferably including non-morphine analgesics, could improve the comfort of critical care patients.

Comfort is a central element of critical care and perioperative management, as demonstrated by Patients-Reported Outcomes (PRO), new assessment tools that take into account the patient as a whole. The (Inconfort of REAnimation Patients) IPREA questionnaire, a specific scale for assessing the comfort of critical care patients, is an example of a PRO.

Lidocaine is a voltage-dependent sodium channel blocker, used as a local anaesthetic and antiarrhythmic agent, whose intravenous administration produces analgesic effects, particularly on hyperalgesia. The widely demonstrated clinical benefits in scheduled and major surgery (reduced post-operative pain, reduced doses of anaesthetic agents and opiates, reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting) have led to recommendations for its use. Furthermore, adverse events associated with lidocaine in continuous infusion are minimal.

Based on the early Comfort using Analgesia (eCASH), minimal Sedative and maximal Human care) concepts, the recent PADIS (Pain, Agitation, Delirium, Immobility, Sleep deprivation) recommendations, which determine levels of evidence and research avenues for improving the quality of care, conclude that intravenous lidocaine may be beneficial, but there is a lack of data.

The investigators are therefore proposing a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of lidocaine infused continuously for 48 hours on the perceived comfort of post-operative critical care patients, as assessed by the IPREA score.

IPREA, an 18-item score exploring PADIS, is a direct, relevant, objective and reproducible assessment criterion for evaluating algorithms for improving the quality of care. The data on sources of discomfort reveal the importance of pain, dyspnoea, thirst and sleep deprivation, which are all influenced by the analgesia-sedation protocol. Incorporating lidocaine with anti-hyperalgesic properties into the protocol should reduce discomfort in critical care patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The choice of analgesia protocol will be left to the discretion of the clinician between MORPHINE CHLORHYDRATE, SUFENTANIL and REMIFENTANIL for objectives of Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) (3 to 5) or pain visual analogue scale (VAS) \< 4.

The use of co-analgesics intraoperatively (Paracetamol, Nefopam, NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) such as Ketoprofen or Ibuprofen, Ketamine) is authorised (data not collected).

If a hypnotic is required intraoperatively, the choice of agent is left to the discretion of the clinician.

Once the sedation-analgesia protocol has been discontinued, pain relief is left to the clinician's discretion.

Patients are monitored from randomisation until discharge from the critical care unit or until a maximum of 30 days post-operatively.

In the event of an adverse reaction linked to lidocaine (see list in § 8.2.), the doctor stops administration of the product.

The blind is lifted (see § 9.2 'Insu (or blinding)'). If the patient is in the lidocaine group, the lidocaine plasma concentration is measured to check for a toxic plasma concentration (see § 5.6 'Management of biological samples').

It should be noted that the completion of an assay or discontinuation of treatment does not result in the patient's withdrawal from the clinical trial. Patient follow-up continues until the end of the trial.

If the patient is discharged from critical care before the 30th post-operative day, the patient's vital status on the 30th post-operative day will be collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-surgery Critical Incare

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Comparison of Lidocaine IVSE to placebo. Randomisation by block in 1:1, stratified according to centre.

All patients were randomised as soon as possible and within 6 hours of leaving the operating theatre, into one of two groups:

* Experimental group: 2% Lidocaine, bolus of 0.075 ml/kg of real weight (i.e. 1.5 mg/kg) then IVSE at 0.05 ml/kg/h (i.e. 1 mg/kg/h) for 48 hours.
* Control group: placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), bolus of 0.075 ml/kg real weight then IVSE at 0.05 ml/kg/h for 48 hours Treatment is started as soon as possible, up to 2 hours after randomisation. The syringes were prepared by a 'friendly' service (not involved in patient follow-up) and were of identical size to maintain blindness. The randomisation arm was not known to the doctor in charge of the patient.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The syringes are prepared by a 'friendly' service (not involved in the patient's follow-up) and are of identical format whatever the experimental treatment, in order to maintain blindness. The randomisation arm is not known to the doctor in charge of the patient.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine

Lidocaine 2%, bolus of 0.075 ml/kg real weight (i.e. 1.5 mg/kg) then continuous intravenous administration by electric syringe at 0.05 ml/kg/h (i.e. 1 mg/kg/h) for 48 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine (drug)

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine 2%, bolus of 0.075 ml/kg real weight (i.e. 1.5 mg/kg) then IVSE at 0.05 ml/kg/h (i.e. 1 mg/kg/h) for 48 hours

Placebo

Placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), bolus of 0.075 ml/kg of real weight then continuous intravenous administration by electric syringe at 0.05 ml/kg/h for 48h

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), bolus of 0.075 ml/kg of real weight then IVSE at 0.05 ml/kg/h for 48h

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine (drug)

Lidocaine 2%, bolus of 0.075 ml/kg real weight (i.e. 1.5 mg/kg) then IVSE at 0.05 ml/kg/h (i.e. 1 mg/kg/h) for 48 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), bolus of 0.075 ml/kg of real weight then IVSE at 0.05 ml/kg/h for 48h

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidocaine 2% Sodium chloride 0.9%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient over 18
2. Patient admitted immediately post-operatively in critical care (scheduled or emergency admission, e.g. post-operative exploratory laparotomy, cardiac surgery, major orthopaedic surgery such as polytrauma patients, vascular surgery at risk of complications such as open aortic surgery)
3. Anticipated length of stay in critical care ≥ 48h
4. Membership of a social security scheme
5. Informed consent signed by the patient or by a close relative or legal representative or, failing this, the emergency procedure


1. Weight over 100 kg
2. Hypersensitivity to one of the active substances used for anaesthesia or to one of the excipients.
3. Known acute porphyria,
4. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
5. Patients who have received or are about to receive peri-medullary analgesia intra-operatively or post-operatively.
6. Patient who has received or will receive loco-regional analgesia intra-operatively or post-operatively.
7. Severe head injury, open cephalic neurosurgery, interventional neuroradiology
8. Recovered cardiorespiratory arrest
9. Noradrenaline doses \> 0.5 μg/kg/min
10. Stage IV/V chronic renal failure, not on dialysis
11. Severe hepatocellular insufficiency at inclusion (Child-Pugh C)
12. Bradycardia \< 50 bpm on antiarrhythmic drugs
13. Clinical convulsive seizure at inclusion
14. Predictable inability to answer the questionnaire (cognitive impairment, non-Francophone)
15. Known participation in another interventional research study (RIPH1 or RIPH2)
16. Known situation of deprivation of liberty or legal protection (safeguard of justice, guardianship or curatorship)

Exclusion Criteria

Patients under court protection will be excluded as soon as the investigator is aware of their status.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rennes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elodie MASSERET, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rennes University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU d'Angers - RCA (Réanimation Chirurgicale A)

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU d'Angers - RCB (Réanimation Chirurgicale B)

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU de Brest - Réanimation Cardiaque

Brest, , France

Site Status

CH Louis Pasteur (Chartres) - Réanimation

Chartres, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Guillaume et René Laennec - Réanimation Chirurgicale Polyvalente

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nantes - Hôpital Guillaume et René Laennec - Réanimation CTCV

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nantes - Hôtel-Dieu - Réanimation chirurgicale

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Poitiers - Réanimation Chirurgicale

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

CHU de Rennes - Réanimation chirurgicale

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHU de Rennes - Réanimation CTCV

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CH de Saint-Nazaire - Réanimation médico-chirurgicale - Unité de Surveillance Continue (USC)

Saint-Nazaire, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Tours - Hôpital Trousseau - Réanimation Chirurgicale

Tours, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Tours - Hôpital Trousseau - Réanimation URTC

Tours, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Tours - Hôpital Trousseau - Unité de Soins Continus

Tours, , France

Site Status

CH Bretagne Atlantique (Vannes) - Réanimation - Unité de Surveillance Continue

Vannes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elodie MASSERET, MD

Role: CONTACT

+33 2 99 28 42 46

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sigismond LASOCKI, MD

Role: primary

02 41 35 36 35

Emmanuel RINEAU, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 41 35 39 51

Julie LE ROY, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 98 34 73 31

Juliette AUDIBERT, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 37 30 30 30

Alice ROUILLARD, MD

Role: primary

+33 6 62 26 19 92

Côme GAILLARD, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 44 76 86 71

Alexandre BOURDIOL, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 40 08 73 80

Quentin SAINT-GENIS, MD

Role: primary

+33 5 49 44 69 96

Elodie MASSERET, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 99 28 42 46

Grégoire LE GAC, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 99 28 85 94

Michel LEMARIE, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 72 27 80 00

Mathilde BARBAZ, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 47 47 78 67

Mathilde BARBAZ, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 47 47 78 67

Mathilde BARBAZ, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 47 47 78 67

François MATEOS, MD

Role: primary

+33 2 97 01 41 68

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-517749-15-00

Identifier Type: CTIS

Identifier Source: secondary_id

25.00870.000409

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

35RC22_8943_LIDOCRIT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.