Early Palliative Care in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer Using an e-Health Ecosystem

NCT ID: NCT07039994

Last Updated: 2025-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-24

Study Completion Date

2028-07-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Palliative care has long been associated primarily with end-of-life support. However, its scope is much broader. As highlighted in the Hastings Center Report, the purposes of medicine include not only curing disease but also preventing illness, relieving suffering, caring for patients, avoiding preventable deaths, and ensuring a peaceful death when unavoidable. Palliative care plays a vital role in achieving all of these goals. In addition to pain and symptom management, it addresses the prevention of complicated grief, the emergence of severe symptoms (e.g., constipation, delirium), the inappropriate use of end-of-life treatments, and offers specialized care for incurable diseases.

This model of care follows a multidimensional and multidisciplinary approach, focusing on the person beyond the illness and addressing emotional, social, spiritual, and practical needs. Recent studies have shown that early integration of palliative care within routine oncology improves symptom control, emotional well-being, and coping with the illness. Furthermore, it enhances quality of life for both patients and their families, reduces healthcare resource usage, and does not increase overall health expenditure.

Such early integration also facilitates discussions about end-of-life issues, promotes advance care planning, and supports improved home-based palliative care. Additionally, it has been associated with fewer aggressive treatments and a positive impact on patient survival.

Systematic symptom assessment leads to earlier and more effective management. In this context, information and communication technologies (ICTs) have shown promise in enabling remote monitoring and care delivery. These tools can enhance quality of life, improve treatment adherence, reduce emergency visits, and positively influence survival. However, existing studies have limitations, such as small sample sizes and lack of evaluator blinding.

The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the need for physical distancing and accelerated the development of remote healthcare systems. Some specialized cancer centers, like the Institut Català d'Oncologia, have implemented functional multidisciplinary units for each cancer type. These units consist of various specialists (medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, advanced practice nurses, palliative care professionals, etc.) who collaboratively decide the best course of treatment. A key role within these units is the reference nurse, assigned to each patient, who acts as a main point of contact, available for in-person or phone consultations.

One major improvement in recent years has been the integration of palliative care clinics within oncology departments. Best practices now emphasize early palliative intervention based on patient complexity and needs. While no universal definition exists, most studies define "early palliative care" as involvement by a palliative team within the first three months following a diagnosis of advanced cancer. This approach is supported by multiple scientific societies. Nevertheless, challenges such as limited resources, accessibility barriers, and increasing in-person demand near the end of life remain significant obstacles.

Among advanced cancers, lung cancer stands out due to its high prevalence and poor prognosis. It is characterized by frequent and unpredictable symptoms, requiring flexible and responsive follow-up. Adapting care to patients' changing needs could improve quality of life, optimize resources, and reduce the frequency of in-person visits.

This study proposes the integration of early palliative care with an e-Health ecosystem, reflecting the global push to bring care into the homes of vulnerable patients using modern technology. Evidence for the impact of ICTs in palliative care remains limited, and existing studies are generally of low quality. To date, only one registered trial (NCT03375489) has explored e-Health in early palliative care. Unlike that study, this research offers a scalable model tailored to patient complexity, alongside a comprehensive cost-utility evaluation (e.g., fewer in-person visits, emergency care use, and patient transfers to care centers).

This is the first international clinical trial of its kind in palliative care. It is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with blinded third-party evaluation. The hypothesis is that an e-Health ecosystem with ICT tools will improve access, early detection, monitoring, and remote palliative intervention for lung cancer patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Experimental group - e-Health follow-up, a combined system using ICT and in-person care. It includes spontaneous use (symptom tracking, messages, reminders via app) and scheduled use:

* Good symptom control: Basic Telematic Evaluation (BTE) at 1 month. If stable, videoconference at 2 months, BTE at 3 months, and in-person visit at 4 months.
* Poor symptom control: BTE at 1 week. If warning signs appear, a nurse evaluates by phone and may adjust treatment, schedule a visit (in-person or video), or refer to emergency care. In-person visit by need or after 1 month.

Control group - Standard follow-up:

* Good control: In-person visit every 4 weeks.
* Poor control: Nurse calls at 1 week to assess and decide on treatment changes, visits, or referral. In-person visit by need or after 1 month.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

E-health follow-up

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

E-health intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Combined system using ICT and in-person care. It includes spontaneous use (symptom tracking, messages, reminders via app) and scheduled use:

* Good symptom control: Basic Telematic Evaluation (BTE) at 1 month. If stable, videoconference at 2 months, BTE at 3 months, and in-person visit at 4 months.
* Poor symptom control: BTE at 1 week. If warning signs appear, a nurse evaluates by phone and may adjust treatment, schedule a visit (in-person or video), or refer to emergency care. In-person visit by need or after 1 month.

Standard follow-up

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Routine intervention in the service:

* Good control: In-person visit every 4 weeks.
* Poor control: Nurse calls at 1 week to assess and decide on treatment changes, visits, or referral. In-person visit by need or after 1 month.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard intervention

Routine intervention in the service:

* Good control: In-person visit every 4 weeks.
* Poor control: Nurse calls at 1 week to assess and decide on treatment changes, visits, or referral. In-person visit by need or after 1 month.

Intervention Type OTHER

E-health intervention

Combined system using ICT and in-person care. It includes spontaneous use (symptom tracking, messages, reminders via app) and scheduled use:

* Good symptom control: Basic Telematic Evaluation (BTE) at 1 month. If stable, videoconference at 2 months, BTE at 3 months, and in-person visit at 4 months.
* Poor symptom control: BTE at 1 week. If warning signs appear, a nurse evaluates by phone and may adjust treatment, schedule a visit (in-person or video), or refer to emergency care. In-person visit by need or after 1 month.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC (stage III or IV) with criteria for early palliative intervention\*, seen in the initial palliative care consultation.
* Patients or primary caregivers with internet proficiency and access to computer and telephone equipment.
* Patients with ECOG performance status 0-3

* For the purposes of this study, patients with the following conditions will be considered candidates for early palliative care: a tumor diagnosis ≤3 months prior to diagnosis and one or more of the following criteria: average pain poorly controlled with opioids (VAS score ≥4); dyspnea on minor exertion; patients \<60 years of age; emotional distress (HADS ≥10); family fragility; functional limitation (Barthel \<60); history or use of drugs; and the presence of ethical or existential dilemmas (Llorens et al., 2017; Tuca et al., 2019).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who do not meet criteria for early palliative intervention.
* Patients with severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric impairment that prevents proper evaluation.
* Patients who do not speak or understand Catalan or Spanish adequately.
* Patients who, at the first visit, are in a serious clinical condition that prevents proper evaluation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Català d'Oncologia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jesús González

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jesús González

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jesús González Barboteo, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Catalan Institute of Oncology

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Catalan Institute of Oncology

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jesús González Barboteo, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

932607733 ext. +34

Miguel Mateu Sanz, PhD

Role: CONTACT

932607733 ext. +34

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Agnès Calsina Berna, MD, PhD

Role: primary

934978800 ext. +34

Jesús González Barboteo, MD, PhD

Role: primary

932607733 ext. +34

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PR274/21

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AIRPAL-010521

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.