Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (LUNL2)

NCT ID: NCT01337102

Last Updated: 2017-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

103 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-11-30

Study Completion Date

2011-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the treatment of advanced cancer, maximizing quality of life (QoL) is a fundamental goal for oncologists and their patients. In order to achieve this goal, some form of systematic and reliable QoL assessment is needed in routine clinical practice to evaluate the impact of advanced cancer treatments on QoL. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a validated site-specific QoL measure designed for use in patients with lung cancer undergoing treatment. Recently it has been developed into an electronic form that uses a hand-held pocket personal computer (pc) to enhance collection and presentation of QoL assessments into clinical trials and patient care. This study will evaluate the impact of this computer-generated QoL (LCSS-QL) assessment on treatment practices for advanced lung cancer patients using a randomized trial design. The investigators hypothesize that a Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program will positively impact treatment patterns for patients with lung cancer.

Specifically, the investigators hypothesize:

1. Use of the LCSS-QL will increase and accelerate referral to and use of palliative care services;
2. Use of the LCSS-QL will decrease the duration of palliative chemotherapy treatment with earlier identification of lack of benefit in some patients;
3. Use of the LCSS-QL may decrease the use of imaging tests to assess objective tumor response as an indicator of treatment benefit.

Maximizing quality of life is one of the most important goals of palliative chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. If this simple practical tool can be demonstrated to improve palliative management of these patients, including optimizing duration of chemotherapy and use of palliative and supportive services based on patient QoL response, this will dramatically improve the quality of care provided to advanced lung cancer patients. This study will also provide a springboard for other ways to incorporate computer-generated QoL measurement in treatment decision-making in advanced cancer patients, including in other tumor types such as advanced breast and colorectal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Design The study will be conducted using an unblinded, randomized trial design. Patients starting systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC will be invited to complete the LCSS-QL upon starting first-line systemic chemotherapy and then prior to subsequent treatment visits (every 3 weeks). Patients will then be randomized at baseline to whether or not their physician will receive this information at the time of clinic visits for the duration of study participation. Randomization codes will be generated by computer program, with stratification by physician, platinum-based versus non-platinum based therapy and Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status 0 and 1 versus 2 and 3. All patients complete the LCSS-QL at baseline, at the beginning of each cycle of chemotherapy, and at follow up visits until disease progression (initiation of subsequent therapy)or discontinue clinic visits an expected average of 12 to 18 weeks.

Patient Population All NSCLC patients with advanced disease (Stage 3B or 4) starting systemic therapy at the Princess Margaret Hospital will be eligible to participate. Inclusion criteria include the physical ability to use the hand-held instrument (adequate vision, manual dexterity), provision of written informed consent, and written fluency in English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese or Chinese. Patients will be excluded if they are unable to complete or understand the assessment process, or if they are receiving concurrent radical radiotherapy.

Physician Information Physicians will be trained in interpretation of the LCSS electronic output data, in order to facilitate interpretation of the different domains of patient well-being, for example pain scores. An endorsement sheet will be printed in addition to the LCSS data, highlighting major changes in quality of life. For example, deterioration in pain control will be highlighted with suggestions to increase or change pain medication, consider radiotherapy and other pain management options, including changing systemic therapy.

Outcomes

Endpoints include palliative care referral rates, duration of systemic therapy, use of supportive interventions and QoL during treatment.

Data on the number of chemotherapy cycles administered, referral to palliative care (including timing), institution of additional supportive treatments, and number of imaging tests ordered will be collected for all patients prospectively. Data on LCSS scores, subsequent therapy, and date of death will also be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Physician to receive results

Arm 1 Physician to receive the results of the Lung QoL scale

Group Type OTHER

Physician Receives QoL results

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient completes the Lung Cancer QoL scale on the Palm held computer device and the Physician receives the print out of the results.

Physician Does Not Receive Results

Arm 2 Physician does not receive the results of the Lung QoL scale

Group Type OTHER

Physician Does not receive the results

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patient completes the Lung Cancer QoL scale on the Palm held computer device and the Physician does not receive the print out of the results.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physician Receives QoL results

Patient completes the Lung Cancer QoL scale on the Palm held computer device and the Physician receives the print out of the results.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Physician Does not receive the results

Patient completes the Lung Cancer QoL scale on the Palm held computer device and the Physician does not receive the print out of the results.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of Primary Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
* Stage 3 or 4 Lung Cancer
* To receive 1st line Chemotherapy
* Platinum based chemotherapy or Non Platinum
* Physical ability to use the hand held device(adequate vision, manual dexterity),
* ECOG 1-2
* Written fluency in English, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese or Chinese

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients will be excluded if they are unable to complete or understand the assessment process,
* If they are receiving concurrent radical radiotherapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

NATASHA LEIGHL, MD MSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK / PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04-0349-CE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Survival Outcomes of Lung Cancer
NCT03647098 RECRUITING