Improvement of Quality of Life (QoL) Using Preference-Oriented QoLMonitoring in Patients with Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT06252233

Last Updated: 2024-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-15

Study Completion Date

2025-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether a preference-oriented quality of life monitoring with defined diagnostic and therapeutic options improves quality of life in patients with lung cancer during routine follow-up care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A pathway with quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer has been successfully designed, implemented, and evaluated as guided by the Medical Research Council framework for developing and testing complex interventions. In two randomised controlled trials the investigators could demonstrate that patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer had a benefit from the diagnosis of QoL deficits and tailored therapeutic options in their treatment in terms of a decrease in QoL deficits.

The next step is to extend usability of the QoL system so that it can be as well used by patients with other cancer diagnoses and in other study regions. Therefore, QoL will be assessed using an electronic patient- and physician-centered QoL monitoring system which is based on previous work of the research group. The QoL monitoring system is adapted based on results of a preliminary study using discrete choice experiments (DCE) identifying preferences of lung cancer patients and their physicians regarding the importance of individual QoL dimensions.

In this two-arm randomised, controlled, prospective, pragmatic, multicentre clinical trial with one intervention group and one control group QoL of primary lung cancer patients will be assessed with an electronic patient- and physician-centered QoL monitoring system using the quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer EORTC QLQ-C30 (core module) and QLQ-LC29 (lung cancer module) at study entry and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months during follow-up care. Data of each patient's QoL will be linked with clinical data from the Bavarian Cancer Registry for the purpose of data analysis.

In the intervention group results of QoL monitoring are automatically transferred to a preference-based QoL profile including 8 dimensions on scales of 0-100 (cutoff of a "need for QoL therapy" \<50). Patients and their treating physicians receive the results of their QoL monitoring in real-time. In order to be able to treat QoL deficits a multi-professional network of therapists is established (e.g. pain therapy, psychotherapy, social support, nutrition counselling, physiotherapy, fitness, respiratory therapy, palliative care). In the intervention group patients and their physicians receive complete lists of QoL healthcare professionals of this network practicing in their region.

In the control group QoL is also measured but neither patients nor treating physicians have access to the results of QoL monitoring, but the therapist network is also available for this study arm.

The investigators expect that the proportion of patients in both groups with a need for QoL therapy (\<50 points in at least one dimension of the QoL profile) will be lower in intervention group patients compared with control group patients at the primary endpoint 6 months after study entry.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient- and physician-centered QoL monitoring

Quality of life (QoL) of patients is assessed with an electronic patient- and physician-centered QoL monitoring system using the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC29 at study entry and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months during follow-up care. Results of QoL monitoring are automatically transferred to a QoL profile. Patients and their treating physicians receive the results of their QoL monitoring in real-time. In order to be able to treat QoL deficits a multiprofessional network of therapists is established (e.g. pain therapy, psychotherapy, social support, nutrition counselling, physiotherapy, fitness, respiratory therapy). Intervention group physicians and patients receive complete lists of QoL healthcare professionals of this network practicing in their region. To provide continuous medical education, quality circles for therapy options have been founded.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

patient- and physician-centered QoL monitoring

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Electronic QoL monitoring including QoL diagnosis and therapy (pain therapy, psychotherapy, social support, nutrition, physiotherapy, fitness, respiratory counselling, palliative care). Patients and treating physicians have access to the results of their QoL monitoring and to a network of local healthcare providers.

Routine care

QoL of patients is also assessed with the same QoL monitoring system used in the intervention group at study entry and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months but neither patients nor treating physicians have access to the QoL profiles. The therapist network is also available for control arm.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Electronic QoL monitoring without QoL diagnosis and therapy. Patients and treating physicians have no access to the results of their QoL monitoring. The therapist network is also available for control arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

patient- and physician-centered QoL monitoring

Electronic QoL monitoring including QoL diagnosis and therapy (pain therapy, psychotherapy, social support, nutrition, physiotherapy, fitness, respiratory counselling, palliative care). Patients and treating physicians have access to the results of their QoL monitoring and to a network of local healthcare providers.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Placebo

Electronic QoL monitoring without QoL diagnosis and therapy. Patients and treating physicians have no access to the results of their QoL monitoring. The therapist network is also available for control arm.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. primary diagnosis of lung cancer (ICD C33/C34, all stages)
2. treatment in one of six recruiting hospitals treating patients with lung cancer (University Hospital Regensburg, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Hospital Bayreuth, Hospital Coburg, Hospital Kulmbach, Hospital Bamberg);
3. difference between date of histology and date of study entry not exceeding 2 months;
4. informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria

1. unavailability of a study clinician for patient recruitment;
2. patient misclassified in the candidate list (no primary diagnosis, no lung tumour);
3. coordinating practitioner refuses trial participation;
4. patient outside the defined study region (Germany, Bavaria: Upper Palatinate, Lower Bavaria, Upper Franconia);
5. age under 18 years;
6. pregnancy/ breastfeeding;
7. patient unable to fill out the QoL questionnaire (physical, psychological, cognitive, language reasons);
8. patient refuses trial participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Regensburg, Tumor Center Regensburg, Center for Quality Management and Health Services Research

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

G-BA Innovationsfonds

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Regensburg, Center for Clinical Trials

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Bayreuth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Martin Emmert

Prof. Dr. Martin Emmert

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martin Emmert, PhD, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Bayreuth, Faculty of Law, Business and Economics, Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences

Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, MD, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Regensburg, Centre for Quality Management and Health Services Resarch

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum Bamberg

Bamberg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Bayreuth

Bayreuth, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Klinikum Coburg GmbH

Coburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Caritas Krankenhaus St. Maria Donaustauf

Donaustauf, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Klinikum Kulmbach

Kulmbach, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Klinikum St. Elisabeth Straubing

Straubing, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Martin Emmert, PhD, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

+49 160 92203562

Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, MD, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

+49-941-943-1803

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rumo Leistner, MD, Dr.

Role: primary

Alexander Kiani, MD, Prof.

Role: primary

Claus Steppert, MD, Dr.

Role: primary

Maximilian Malfertheiner, MD, Prof.

Role: primary

Thomas Bohrer, MD, Prof.

Role: primary

Joseph Alhanna, MD, Dr.

Role: backup

Hans-Stefan Hofmann, MD, Prof.

Role: primary

Michael Pfeifer, MD, Prof.

Role: backup

Hans-Stefan Hofmann, MD, Prof.

Role: primary

Christian Schulz, MD, Prof.

Role: backup

Jorge Fernando Gamarra, MD, Dr.

Role: primary

Jochen Grassinger, MD, Prof.

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Steinger B, Koller M, Zeman F, Furst A, Gumpp J, Obermaier R, Piso P, Lindberg-Scharf P; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Diagnosing deficits in quality of life and providing tailored therapeutic options: Results of a randomised trial in 220 patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32179445 (View on PubMed)

Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Steinger B, Ehret C, Ernst B, Wyatt JC, Hofstadter F, Lorenz W; Regensburg QoL Study Group. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):826-38. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.4. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22315052 (View on PubMed)

Lindberg-Scharf P, Steinger B, Koller M, Hofstadter A, Ortmann O, Kurz J, Sasse J, Klinkhammer-Schalke M. Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7865-7875. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06270-1. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34176020 (View on PubMed)

Lindberg-Scharf P, Emmert M, Koller M, Gurtler F, Steinger B, Muller-Nordhorn J, Zeman F, Friebel S, Ibler K, Kurz J, Stangl T, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Volkel V. Preference-oriented quality of life monitoring and linkage with clinical registry data: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial in patients with lung cancer (LePaLuMo Study). Trials. 2025 Sep 16;26(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09102-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40958112 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LePaLuMo_2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

QOL After SURGERY and ADJUVANT Treatment
NCT06115239 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Cognition and Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT07160751 NOT_YET_RECRUITING