The Effects of Cognitive-motor Dual-task Intervention on Fall Prevention Among Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT07025278

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Develop an evidence-based dual-task intervention programme incorporating gamification for fall risk reduction in older adults.
2. Examine the effects of the gamified dual-task intervention on fall risk in older adults.
3. Elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the optimal gamified dual-task intervention programme in reducing falls in older adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ELDERLY PEOPLE Cognitive-motor Dual-task Fall Prevention Intervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medium difficulty fixed priority group

Participants in this group underwent a medium-difficulty and fixed-priority cognitive-motor dual-task fall prevention intervention program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medium difficulty fixed priority group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During the intervention process, participants carried out cognitive and motor tasks simultaneously. They were told to divide attention equally between them and not prioritize one over the other.

Medium difficulty variable priority group

Participants in this group underwent a medium-difficulty and variable-priority cognitive-motor dual-task fall prevention intervention program

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Medium difficulty variable priority group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During the intervention process, participants performed medium-difficulty cognitive and motor tasks simultaneously. Participants alter focus between the motor task and the cognitive task every half of the intervention time.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medium difficulty fixed priority group

During the intervention process, participants carried out cognitive and motor tasks simultaneously. They were told to divide attention equally between them and not prioritize one over the other.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Medium difficulty variable priority group

During the intervention process, participants performed medium-difficulty cognitive and motor tasks simultaneously. Participants alter focus between the motor task and the cognitive task every half of the intervention time.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 65 years old;
2. Able to walk independently for at least 10 meters without obvious pain or difficulty;
3. Free from lower limb and foot deformities, wounds, ulcers, or other diseases, and capable of wearing flexible devices;
4. Scored as low or moderate fall risk on the Morse Fall Risk Assessment Scale;
5. Scored \> 40 points on the Berg Balance Scale and \< 20 seconds on the Time Up and Go Test (TUG);
6. Scored ≥ 21 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE);
7. With an educational level of primary school or above, able to correctly understand instructions and make corresponding responses;
8. Without diseases that severely affect cognitive and motor functions, including cardiovascular diseases (such as uncontrolled hypertension, heart failure, etc.), neurological diseases (such as Parkinson's disease, stroke, epilepsy, etc.), musculoskeletal diseases (such as severe arthritis, recent fractures, etc.), etc.;
9. Normal vision and hearing or corrected to normal, without affecting the understanding of instructions and participation in interventions;
10. Conscious and able to understand the test requirements;
11. Able to understand and sign the informed consent form voluntarily, and willing to cooperate in completing the research procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Must rely on assistive walking devices or others to walk;
2. Individuals with color vision disorders, including various types of color blindness and color weakness;
3. Unable to correctly perform addition and subtraction operations;
4. Those allergic to the materials of research equipment;
5. Currently participating in other research or intervention projects that may affect the effectiveness of this intervention.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jinyao Wang

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jinyao Wang

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ethics No. 2573, 2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.