the MCCE vs EGD Trial

NCT ID: NCT07004530

Last Updated: 2025-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

238 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-24

Study Completion Date

2027-11-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anaemia Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Patients meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized by one of the research team staff via sealed envelopes with computer generated randomization number to one of the two study arms (0 for EGD, 1 for CE) in a 1:1 ratio, according to a central randomization scheme. Due to the nature of the interventions, researchers and patients are not blinded to group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MCCE-first arm

MCCE will be performed for individuals randomized to MCCE arm within the same hospitalization of ACS diagnosis. The MCCE used in this study is the magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE, AnPx USA) which is a capsule measuring 28x12mm, and contains a permanent magnet inside its dome. Images are captured and recorded at 2 frames/s. Before the MCCE procedure, subjects will be fasted for 8 hours. Capsule will be swallowed with 10ml of clear liquid. During the MCCE examination, subjects will be asked to drink 500 to 1000ml water on demand. Once inside the stomach, the capsule will be navigated via an external magnetic guidance system to obtain a full view of the stomach. After the gastric examination, the subject wears a portable image recorder for images of duodenum and the rest of the small bowel for about 4 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

. The MCCE used in this study is the magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE, AnPx USA) which is a capsule measuring 28x12mm, and contains a permanent magnet inside its dome. Images are captured and recorded at 2 frames/s

EGD-first arm

Conventional EGD with intravenous sedation will be performed for individuals randomized to EGD arm within the same hospitalization of ACS diagnosis by an experienced endoscopist. Similar MLD and Forest ulcer grading will be applied as in MCCE arm. Endoscopic therapeutic procedures will be performed at endoscopist's discretion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly performed to look for source of bleeding in patients with anaemia. However, from our own analysis and from retrospective studies of EGD in patients with ACS, EGD finding was normal or non-significant in 20-80% patients14-16. Moreover, EGD was associated with non-negligible periprocedural risks in patients with ACS, including death directly attributed to EGD (9.1%; 95% CI 7.6-10.9%), hypotension (24.1%; 95% CI 17.0-32.9%), arrhythmias (8.3%; 95% CI 4.5-15.1%) and recurrent ACS (6.5%; 95% CI 3.2-12.8%)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE)

. The MCCE used in this study is the magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE, AnPx USA) which is a capsule measuring 28x12mm, and contains a permanent magnet inside its dome. Images are captured and recorded at 2 frames/s

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD)

Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly performed to look for source of bleeding in patients with anaemia. However, from our own analysis and from retrospective studies of EGD in patients with ACS, EGD finding was normal or non-significant in 20-80% patients14-16. Moreover, EGD was associated with non-negligible periprocedural risks in patients with ACS, including death directly attributed to EGD (9.1%; 95% CI 7.6-10.9%), hypotension (24.1%; 95% CI 17.0-32.9%), arrhythmias (8.3%; 95% CI 4.5-15.1%) and recurrent ACS (6.5%; 95% CI 3.2-12.8%)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

subjects are patients older than 18 years old with:

1. the diagnosis of ACS as defined by symptoms of chest pain or shortness-of-breath, abnormal electrocardiogram and positive enzyme, requiring coronary intervention
2. new-onset anaemia as defined by Hb\<11 g/dL on admission blood taking

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of active haematological disease including hemoglobinopathies such as thalassemia, Myelodysplastic syndromes, haematological malignancy, aplastic anaemia, or autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.
2. Patients with known active gastrointestinal malignancy.
3. Contraindications for CE: suspected or known gastrointestinal obstruction, stenosis, fistula, diverticula, presence of gastrointestinal obstruction symptoms such as pain or dysphagia; inoperative conditions or refusal to undergo abdominal surgery if required; history of laparotomy, gastric or bowel surgery; presence of metallic implants that is not MRI conditional.
4. Contraindications for EGD: Possible gastrointestinal perforation, medically unstable patients, patient with known pharyngeal diverticulum, and patients with recent head and neck trauma.
5. Inability to take 1-month DAPT such as non-deferrable surgery within 1 months, severe allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors, or patients in whom 1 months DAPT is not indicated.
6. Patients whose life-expectancy is less than 6 months.
7. Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
8. Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
9. Patients who are in active heart failure or fluid-overload state.
10. Patients who have chronic renal failure as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate \<15 ml/min/1.73m2.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Health and Medical Research Fund

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

GuangMing Tan

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024.237

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.