Accuracy of Magnetically Maneuvered Capsule Endoscopy for Detection of EGV in Patients With Cirrhosis

NCT ID: NCT03748563

Last Updated: 2023-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

607 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-07

Study Completion Date

2023-03-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a diagnostic accuracy study. Eligible individuals will be enrolled and asked to undergo ds-MCE and EGD examinations. EGD is the reference standard against which ds-MCE is compared, and it will be performed within 48 hours after ds-MCE examination. The primary outcome is the sensitivity and specificity of ds-MCE in identifying the presence of esophagogastric (EGV) in patients with cirrhosis, using detection by EGD as the reference. The diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE in detection of high-risk EV, high-risk EGV, EV, large EV, red signs of EV, GV, cardiofundal GV and PHG compared with the EGD will also be assessed. The incidence of PHE in small bowel under ds-MCE, the examination time of ds-MCE and EGD procedures, patient satisfaction assessment and safety evaluation will also be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cirrhosis is the major cause of liver disease-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Portal hypertension (PH) is the hemodynamic abnormality in patients with cirrhosis, which is associated with various pathological changes throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract, manifesting as esophagogastric varices (EGV), portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG), and portal hypertensive enteropathy (PHE). Baveno consensus and other practice guidelines recommended that patients with cirrhosis undergo endoscopic screening for EGV at the time of diagnosis and undergo periodic surveillance endoscopy throughout the whole course of cirrhosis.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is recognized as the gold standard for detection and follow-up of EGV in cirrhotic patients, allowing for direct mucosal visualization and therapeutic intervention. EGD is however an invasive procedure and there is potential for procedure-related complications, such as perforation and bleeding. Besides, conscious sedation is always required, leading to increased cost, risk, and inconvenience for the patients.These factors lead to a decrease of patient compliance as well as the effectiveness of the screening program.

The capsule endoscopy (CE) system provides a noninvasive and relatively comfortable approach to visualize the GI tract, and the development of esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) makes it possible to capture clear images of esophagus without the need of sedation. However, the accuracy of ECE is not currently sufficient to replace EGD for the detection and grading for the esophageal varices. Besides, previous studies presented that the sensitivity of ECE for detecting gastric varices (GVs) and PHG varies from 3% to 69%, which denoted ECE was far from a suitable alternative for diagnosing gastric lesions.

To overcome these limitations, a new technique, so-called detachable string magnetically maneuvered capsule endoscopy (ds-MCE) was developed. The ds-MCE system consists of two parts: the magnetically maneuvered capsule endoscopy (MCE) system and a transparent latex sleeve with a hollow string. One end of the hollow string is a transparent thin latex sleeve that can be wrapped on the surface of the capsule, and the other end of the string is connected to the syringe. The capsule, which is partially enclosed within the sleeve, can be actively moved in the esophagus through the control of string. In this case, investigator can examine the entire esophageal mucosa several times under real time views. The capsule then can be detached from the string system through injecting air into the hollow string with the syringe after completing the examination of esophagus. The magnetic capsule in the stomach can be accurately controlled through multidimensional rotation and adaptive matching of an external C-arm robot. Previous studies have demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of MCE for detecting gastric focal lesions is comparable with that of conventional EGD. Two previously studies of ds-MCE confirmed it was a feasible, safe and well-tolerated method for completely viewing esophagus and stomach, without the need for sedation. Besides, the 8-10h battery life of the ds-MCE enables complete examination of the small bowel, which enables to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of gastrointestinal changes.

Considering all these backgrounds, in the current prospective study, the primary aim is to assess the diagnostic performance of the ds-MCE in identifying the presence of EGV in cirrhotic patients, using EGD as the reference standard. The diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE in detection of high-risk EV, high-risk EGV, EV, large EV, red signs of EV, GV, cardiofundal GV and PHG compared with the EGD will also be assessed. The incidence of PHE in small bowel under ds-MCE, the examination time of ds-MCE and EGD procedures, patient satisfaction assessment and safety evaluation will also be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Cirrhosis Portal Hypertension Esophageal Varices Gastric Varix

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Diagnostic accuracy study
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ds-MCE and EGD

All the enrolled participants will undergo the examination of detachable string magnetically maneuvered capsule endoscopy (ds-MCE) first, followed by EGD within 48 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ds-MCE and EGD

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Procedure of ds-MCE:

The ds-MCE system mainly consists of two parts: the NaviCam magnetically maneuvered capsule endoscopy system and the detachable string part. The capsule, which is partially enclosed within the sleeve, can be actively moved in the esophagus through the control of string. Investigator can examine the entire esophagus several times under real time views. After completing the esophageal examination, the capsule could be detached from the string through injecting air into the hollow string with the syringe. Then, the examination of stomach under magnetic control and small bowel under the natural action of gastrointestinal peristalsis follows.

Procedure of EGD:

The esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be performed using conventional upper gastrointestinal video endoscopy, according to the standard procedure at individual centers. EGD will be performed within 48 hours after ds-MCE procedure and usually during the same endoscopic session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ds-MCE and EGD

Procedure of ds-MCE:

The ds-MCE system mainly consists of two parts: the NaviCam magnetically maneuvered capsule endoscopy system and the detachable string part. The capsule, which is partially enclosed within the sleeve, can be actively moved in the esophagus through the control of string. Investigator can examine the entire esophagus several times under real time views. After completing the esophageal examination, the capsule could be detached from the string through injecting air into the hollow string with the syringe. Then, the examination of stomach under magnetic control and small bowel under the natural action of gastrointestinal peristalsis follows.

Procedure of EGD:

The esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be performed using conventional upper gastrointestinal video endoscopy, according to the standard procedure at individual centers. EGD will be performed within 48 hours after ds-MCE procedure and usually during the same endoscopic session.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Gender is not limited.
2. Patients aged 18 years or older.
3. Both inpatients and outpatients.
4. Clinically evident or biopsy-proven liver cirrhosis.
5. Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged less than 18 years.
2. Patients with Zenker's diverticulum.
3. Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding.
4. Patients who have participated in or are participating in other clinical trials.
5. Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy.
6. Suspected or known intestinal stenosis or other known risk factors for capsule retention.
7. Pacemaker or other implanted electromedical devices which could interfere with magnetic resonance.
8. Patients with dysphagia.
9. Life-threatening conditions.
10. Patients plan to undergo magnetic resonance imaging examination before excretion of the MCE.
11. Patients who refuse to give informed consent.
12. Patients with any condition that precludes compliance with the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yangpu District Central Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhujiang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Changhai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhuan Liao

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhuan Liao

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Changhai Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Zhuhai, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status

Ruijin Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth people's Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Yangpu District Central Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

Hanzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Changhai Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Franchis R, Eisen GM, Laine L, Fernandez-Urien I, Herrerias JM, Brown RD, Fisher L, Vargas HE, Vargo J, Thompson J, Eliakim R. Esophageal capsule endoscopy for screening and surveillance of esophageal varices in patients with portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2008 May;47(5):1595-603. doi: 10.1002/hep.22227.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18435461 (View on PubMed)

Gralnek IM, Adler SN, Yassin K, Koslowsky B, Metzger Y, Eliakim R. Detecting esophageal disease with second-generation capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation of the PillCam ESO 2. Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):275-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995645.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18389444 (View on PubMed)

de Franchis R; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 3. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26047908 (View on PubMed)

North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med. 1988 Oct 13;319(15):983-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198810133191505.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3262200 (View on PubMed)

Spina GP, Arcidiacono R, Bosch J, Pagliaro L, Burroughs AK, Santambrogio R, Rossi A. Gastric endoscopic features in portal hypertension: final report of a consensus conference, Milan, Italy, September 19, 1992. J Hepatol. 1994 Sep;21(3):461-7. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80329-0. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7836719 (View on PubMed)

Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology. 1992 Dec;16(6):1343-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840160607.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1446890 (View on PubMed)

Kodama M, Uto H, Numata M, Hori T, Murayama T, Sasaki F, Tsubouchi N, Ido A, Shimoda K, Tsubouchi H. Endoscopic characterization of the small bowel in patients with portal hypertension evaluated by double balloon endoscopy. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(8):589-96. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2198-1. Epub 2008 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18709480 (View on PubMed)

D'Amico G, De Franchis R; Cooperative Study Group. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003 Sep;38(3):599-612. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50385.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12939586 (View on PubMed)

Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007 Sep;46(3):922-38. doi: 10.1002/hep.21907. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17879356 (View on PubMed)

Lapalus MG, Dumortier J, Fumex F, Roman S, Lot M, Prost B, Mion F, Ponchon T. Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: a prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance. Endoscopy. 2006 Jan;38(1):36-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924975.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16429353 (View on PubMed)

Jiang X, Pan J, Xu Q, Song YH, Sun HH, Peng C, Qi XL, Qian YY, Zou WB, Yang Y, Jin SQ, Duan BS, Wu S, Chu Y, Xiao DH, Hu LJ, Cao JZ, Dai JF, Liu X, Xia T, Zhou W, Chen T, Zhou CH, Wu W, Liu SJ, Yang ZY, Wang F, Zhang L, Li CZ, Xu H, Wang JX, Wei B, Lin Y, Deng X, Qu LH, Shen YQ, Wang H, Huang YF, Bao HB, Zhang S, Li L, Shi YH, Wang XY, Zou DW, Wan XJ, Xu MD, Mao H, He CH, Li Z, Zuo XL, He SX, Xie XP, Liu J, Yang CQ, Spada C, Li ZS, Liao Z. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy with a detachable string for detecting oesophagogastric varices in adults with cirrhosis: prospective multicentre study. BMJ. 2024 Mar 5;384:e078581. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078581.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38443074 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CENTERS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

the MCCE vs EGD Trial
NCT07004530 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA