Effects of Neurocognitive Training on Chronic Ankle Instability

NCT ID: NCT07004114

Last Updated: 2025-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-06

Study Completion Date

2025-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of neurocognitive training on pain, proprioception, injury-related fear, functional, and neurocognitive performance in athletes with chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Materials and Methods: A total of 30 athletes with CAI, with a mean age of 11.10±1.06 years and residing in Balıkesir, were included in the study. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups using simple randomization: the intervention group (n=15) and the control group (n=15). Two participants from the control group were excluded from the final analyses due to missing post-intervention assessments. The intervention group received a neurocognitive training program conducted twice a week for four weeks, following an initial familiarization week. The training was progressively administered on flat ground, balance mat, BOSU, and inverted BOSU. Both groups were evaluated before and after the 4-week intervention using the following measures: the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI), the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), pain intensity, proprioception, fear of re-injury, Y Balance Test (YBT), Side Hop Test, Reactive Balance Test (RBT), and Upper Extremity Choice Reaction Time Test.

Results: The results were analyzed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Ankle Instability Balance Neurocognitive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neurocognitive training group

Neurocognitive training is a program developed by incorporating motor learning strategies and cognitive challenges into neuromuscular training. Cognitive challenges included tasks requiring quick reactions, motor-motor or cognitive-motor tasks (dual-task), congruent and incongruent tasks, exercises combined with mathematical calculations (working memory), and response inhibition tasks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neurocognitive training group

Intervention Type OTHER

Neurocognitive training is a rehabilitation approach that, unlike traditional treatment methods which primarily focus on improving physical performance, emphasizes cognitive functions and psychometric skills. It is a program developed by integrating motor learning strategies and cognitive challenges into neuromuscular training. These cognitive challenges include tasks requiring quick reactions, motor-motor or cognitive-motor tasks (dual-task), congruent and incongruent tasks, exercises involving mathematical calculations (working memory), and response inhibition tasks.

Control group

The control group continued their training and no additional intervention was applied. Four weeks after their initial assessment, the same assessments were applied again with the study group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neurocognitive training group

Neurocognitive training is a rehabilitation approach that, unlike traditional treatment methods which primarily focus on improving physical performance, emphasizes cognitive functions and psychometric skills. It is a program developed by integrating motor learning strategies and cognitive challenges into neuromuscular training. These cognitive challenges include tasks requiring quick reactions, motor-motor or cognitive-motor tasks (dual-task), congruent and incongruent tasks, exercises involving mathematical calculations (working memory), and response inhibition tasks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Aged between 10 and 18 years

At least 2 years of active athletic participation

History of ankle sprain with at least 2 inflammatory symptoms (e.g., pain, swelling)

The most recent sprain occurred at least 3 months prior to the study start date

A score of 11 or above on the FABIT (Simon et al., 2012)

A score of ≤27 on the CAIT (Yin et al., 2022)

Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

History of hip/pelvis, knee, or ankle surgery within the past year

History of ankle fracture

Diagnosis of a neurological disorder

Presence of vestibular disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Balikesir University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ebru Tekin

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Balikesir University

Balıkesir, Bigadiç, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mohammadi F. Comparison of 3 preventive methods to reduce the recurrence of ankle inversion sprains in male soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):922-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546507299259. Epub 2007 Mar 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17379918 (View on PubMed)

Walker JM, Brunst CL, Chaput M, Wohl TR, Grooms DR. Integrating neurocognitive challenges into injury prevention training: A clinical commentary. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Sep;51:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34153635 (View on PubMed)

18) Tekin E, Ünver F. Klinik Nörobilişsel Fonksiyonel Performans Testleri: Geleneksel Derleme. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences, 2023;15(2).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Tassignon B, Verschueren J, Delahunt E, Smith M, Vicenzino B, Verhagen E, Meeusen R. Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Sports Med. 2019 Apr;49(4):601-619. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01071-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30747379 (View on PubMed)

Verschueren J, Tassignon B, Verhagen E, Meeusen R. The interaction of acute physical fatigue with three traditional functional performance tests and the reactive balance test. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 May;49:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33756239 (View on PubMed)

Simon J, Donahue M, Docherty C. Development of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI). Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Sep;33(9):755-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0755.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22995264 (View on PubMed)

Plisky PJ, Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB, Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;4(2):92-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21509114 (View on PubMed)

13) Olsson L, Lund H, Henriksen M, Rogind H, Bliddal H, Danneskiold Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of a knee joint position sense measurement method in sitting and prone position. Advances in Physiotherapy. 2004;6(1):37-47.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Obuz T, Topcu ZG. The effects of exercises with a Pilates ball on balance, reaction time and dual-task performance of kindergarten children. J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Jun;11(8):583-593. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0293. Epub 2022 May 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35514277 (View on PubMed)

Loizidis T, Nikodelis T, Bakas E, Kollias I. The effects of dry needling on pain relief and functional balance in patients with sub-chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(6):953-959. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181265.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32310156 (View on PubMed)

Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Sep;87(9):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16935061 (View on PubMed)

Hertel J. Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain. Sports Med. 2000 May;29(5):361-71. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029050-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10840868 (View on PubMed)

Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley C, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Fourchet F, Fong DT, Hertel J, Hiller C, Kaminski T, McKeon P, Refshauge K, van der Wees P, Vicenzino B, Wikstrom E. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(13):1014-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093175. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24255768 (View on PubMed)

Fong DT, Hong Y, Chan LK, Yung PS, Chan KM. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med. 2007;37(1):73-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737010-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17190537 (View on PubMed)

Engeroff T, Giesche F, Niederer D, Gerten S, Wilke J, Vogt L, Banzer W. Explaining Upper or Lower Extremity Crossover Effects of Visuomotor Choice Reaction Time Training. Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Aug;126(4):675-693. doi: 10.1177/0031512519841755. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31039674 (View on PubMed)

4) Caz Ç, Kayhan RF, Bardakçı S. Spor Yaralanması Kaygı Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi. 2019;54(1): 52-63

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Caldemeyer LE, Brown SM, Mulcahey MK. Neuromuscular training for the prevention of ankle sprains in female athletes: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2020 Nov;48(4):363-369. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2020.1732246. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32067546 (View on PubMed)

Cain MS, Ban RJ, Chen YP, Geil MD, Goerger BM, Linens SW. Four-Week Ankle-Rehabilitation Programs in Adolescent Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability. J Athl Train. 2020 Aug 1;55(8):801-810. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-41-19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32577737 (View on PubMed)

1) Akca NK, Aydın G, Gümüş K. Lomber disk hernili hastaların vücut mekanikleri bilgi düzeyleri ile ağrı şiddeti arasındaki ilişki. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013;2(1):66-77.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.