Clinical Impact of Surgical Wound Morbidity According to the Type of Saphenous Vein Harvesting Technique (Endoscopic vs. Open) in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Revascularization Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07002658

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

356 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different techniques: endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting versus conventional open harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, either alone or in combination with another cardiac surgical procedure (valve surgery or arrhythmia surgery). The main questions the trial aims to answer are:

Does the endoscopic technique reduce surgical wound morbidity in terms of shorter hospital stays? Does endoscopic saphenous harvesting reduce the use of antibiotics for saphenectomy wound infections? Does the endoscopic technique reduce need for wound dressings due to necrosis and/or wound infection, and reduce need for analgesic treatment for wound pain? This prospective, randomized study will be conducted in the Cardiovascular Surgery Service at Hospital Clínico San Carlos.

Participants will be randomly assigned to a different saphenectomy technique. All patients will be assessed for saphenectomy wound complications upon discharge, and by phone call at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months following the intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* Pain in the leg incisions will be assessed using a standarized pain scale.
* Antibiotic and analgesic requirements for infection or pain in the saphenous vein surgical wound will be documeted.
* The need for outpatient treatment or hospitalization due to surgical wounds will be evaluated.
* A surgical wound cosmetic satisfaction survey will be administered to participants.

* Images of the saphenectomy surgical wound will be collected at 1 month postoperatively.
* Major cardiovascular events will be monitored during follow-up visits or hospital admissions and recorded in the RECC database (local service database)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CABG-patients Saphenectomy Endoscopic Surgery Wound Complications Antibiotic Use Cardiac Surgery Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Coronary Artery Bypass Graft With or Without ECC

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One group will receive the open technique for saphenous vein harvesting and the other group will receive the endoscopic technique.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic saphenectomy

Endoscopic vein harvesting in CABG surgery requiring a vein graft with or without extracorporeal circulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Harvesting of the saphenous vein graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Most existing studies on endoscopic saphenectomy have been conducted in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP), whereas most CABG surgeries at the study center are performed without CBP.

The following outcomes will be identified:

* Days of admission or need for hospitalization
* Use of antibiotic therapy for saphenectomy wound infections
* Need for wound dressings due to necrosis and/or wound infection
* Need for analgesic treatment for wound pain

Conventional and open technique for saphenous vein harvesting

Using the conventional open technique for harvesting the saphenous vein in any type of surgery with or without extracorporeal circulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Harvesting of the saphenous vein graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Most existing studies on endoscopic saphenectomy have been conducted in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP), whereas most CABG surgeries at the study center are performed without CBP.

The following outcomes will be identified:

* Days of admission or need for hospitalization
* Use of antibiotic therapy for saphenectomy wound infections
* Need for wound dressings due to necrosis and/or wound infection
* Need for analgesic treatment for wound pain

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Harvesting of the saphenous vein graft

Most existing studies on endoscopic saphenectomy have been conducted in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP), whereas most CABG surgeries at the study center are performed without CBP.

The following outcomes will be identified:

* Days of admission or need for hospitalization
* Use of antibiotic therapy for saphenectomy wound infections
* Need for wound dressings due to necrosis and/or wound infection
* Need for analgesic treatment for wound pain

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), alone or in combination with other surgery (valve or arrhythmia surgery), with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), in which preoperative evaluation includes the plan to use a short saphenous vein segment (alone or in addition to arterial conduits).
* Availability of a surgeon or cardiac surgery resident trained in endoscopic harvesting in the operating room.
* Patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgeries with or without extracorporeal circulation.
* Patients undergoing concomitant cardiac valve replacement surgery, atrial fibrillation surgery, and others, in addition to CABG

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergent surgery or procedures performed during cardiorespiratory arrest
* Myocardial revascularization with arterial grafts only
* Presence of varicose veins
* History of infrainguinal vascular surgery
* Presence of ulcers and/or active infection in the lower limbs
* Previous stroke with neurological sequelae in the legs
* History of deep vein thrombosis in the legs
* Pregnancy
* Age under 18 years
* Lack of signed informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

María Belén Solís Chávez

Cardiac Surgery Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

María B Solís Chávez, MD

Role: CONTACT

+34613888798

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maria B Solis, MD

Role: primary

+34613888798

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zenati MA, Bhatt DL, Bakaeen FG, Stock EM, Biswas K, Gaziano JM, Kelly RF, Tseng EE, Bitondo J, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Haime M, Hattler B, DeMatt E, Scrymgeour A, Huang GD; REGROUP Trial Investigators. Randomized Trial of Endoscopic or Open Vein-Graft Harvesting for Coronary-Artery Bypass. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):132-141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812390. Epub 2018 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30417737 (View on PubMed)

Sousa-Uva M, Neumann FJ, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):4-90. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy289. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30165632 (View on PubMed)

Sampath HK, Lee TJH, Cher CE, Liang S, Cheong OO, Kofidis T, Vitaly S, Sazzad F. A Comprehensive Clinical Outcome Analysis of Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 11;13(12):3405. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123405.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38929933 (View on PubMed)

Li G, Zhang Y, Wu Z, Liu Z, Zheng J. Mid-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic versus open vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31707009 (View on PubMed)

Kopjar T, Dashwood MR. Towards Endoscopic No-Touch Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting in Coronary Bypass Surgery. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Sep 2;37(Spec 1):57-65. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0144.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36054003 (View on PubMed)

Kodia K, Patel S, Weber MP, Luc JGY, Choi JH, Maynes EJ, Rizvi SA, Horan DP, Massey HT, Entwistle JW, Morris RJ, Tchantchaleishvili V. Graft patency after open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Sep;7(5):586-597. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.07.05.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30505742 (View on PubMed)

Fudulu D, Angelini GD. Saphenous vein graft longevity: open or endoscopic, with VEST or without? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;62(1):ezac144. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac144. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35323908 (View on PubMed)

Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB. Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6(6):E143-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14722001 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25/148-E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Protection During Cardiac Surgery.
NCT03230136 COMPLETED NA