Reliability and Validity of Continuous Inter-limb Stability

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To date, there is no valid and reliable measure of continuous inter-limb stability available to healthcare teams treating people with lower limb loss. Determining these characteristics of this parameter for this population is important because superior stability has been linked to increased physical activity and strength in similar populations, making it a potential vital contributor to mobility improvement of Veterans with limb loss. It is also crucial that healthcare providers can easily measure continuous stability in the clinic instead of relying on expensive laboratory equipment. The overall goals of this study are to determine the reliability and validity of continuous inter-limb stability of Veterans with lower limb loss and determine if this parameter can be captured using accessible wearable technology. Consequently, clinicians can improve continuous stability through proper rehabilitation to positively impact the functional mobility and overall quality of life of Veterans with lower limb loss.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Real-time Motion Capture and Visual Feedback for Amputation Gait Training

NCT07049198

Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation Unilateral Knee Disarticulation

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Outcome Measures for Lower Limb Amputees - A Repeatability Study

NCT01953939

Lower Limb Amputation

COMPLETED NA

Quantification of Motor Compensation Following Biomechanical, Proprioceptive and Physiological Alterations Post-lower Limb Amputation.

NCT06780943

Amputation

RECRUITING

Outcome Measures for Lower Limb Amputees - A Rehabilitation Study

NCT01946321

Lower Limb Amputation

COMPLETED NA

The Effect of Alternative Prosthetic Alignments on Sit-to-Stand Proficiency in Transtibial Amputees

NCT04657614

Amputation Balance Prosthesis

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is currently no valid or reliable biomechanical variable available to objectively measure the continuous stability of Veterans with lower limb loss. However, continuous inter-limb stability represents a potential target to improve whole-body dynamics, as it is an important measure of functional mobility in individuals with lower limb loss. Determining the reliability and validity of this measure is critical for limb loss care teams since these features are fundamental to interpretability and assessment of this parameter. Unlike traditional clinical assessments of stability that focus on the time of task execution, Relative Phase (RP) analysis, which is a novel methodology that can be used to evaluate continuous stability, uses both space and time within one outcome variable. While previous literature supports the use of continuous stability for mobility challenged populations, such as individuals with limb loss, it has yet to be shown reliable and valid for such populations. Therefore, the first aim of this study is to identify the reliability and validity of continuous inter-limb stability in individuals with transtibial limb loss (TLL) using RP analysis. For this parameter to be used clinically, it is vital to provide rehabilitation specialists the ability to assess continuous stability within the clinical setting. To date, this factor of functional mobility has only been evaluated using 3-dimensional (3-D) motion capture, which is costly and inaccessible to most rehabilitation clinics. Therefore, the second aim of this study is to identify the strength of the association between wearable technology (using inertial measurement units) and 3-D motion capture system for evaluation of continuous interlimb stability of individuals with TLL. The central hypothesis is that continuous stability evaluated using RP analysis will be a reliable and valid measure of functional mobility for Veterans with TLL and that data captured via wearable technology will be strongly associated with 3-D analysis. Twenty Veterans with TLL will be recruited and enrolled via the Prosthetic or Physical Medicine Departments at Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, where all data collection will occur. To measure test re-test reliability, participants will undergo 3 sessions of 3-D gait analysis while walking at a moderate speed (1.3m/s) until 15 walking cycles are captured, with 1 day between sessions. RP analysis will be used to identify the continuous inter-limb stability of gait patterns. Participants will be fit with wearable technology and data will be collected concurrently. To measure convergent validity, participants will perform functional outcome measures including the Timed Up and Go test, 6 Minute Walk Test, Hill and Stair Assessment Indexes, and Amputee Mobility Predictor. Data from 40 participants are required to appropriately power the analysis of convergent validity. To achieve this power, data from 20 participants collected during a previously funded Department of Defense study will be leveraged and added to the data of the 20 participants collected during the proposed study. This is possible due to identical data collection techniques in both studies. To assess the level of agreement between the data obtained from the 3 sessions, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients will be calculated for each variable, in addition to Cohen's kappa statistics and Pearson correlation coefficients. To assess convergent validity, Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients will quantify the strength and direction of the relationships between the outcome measures and continuous stability. Substantiating the use of continuous stability in Veterans with TLL will afford healthcare providers information necessary to accurately detect and appropriately address stability deficiencies, which is critical since superior stability is linked to increased physical activity leading to an enhanced overall quality of life of Veterans with limb loss. Verifying the reliability and validity of this parameter will lead to its confident application for future studies focused on effectiveness, optimization, and rehabilitation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation, Lower Limb

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity of Inter-limb Stability using 3D motion capture, functional outcome measures, and wearable devices

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D motion capture, wearable devices, and functional outcome measures

Intervention Type OTHER

Gait evaluation, Hill and Stair Assessment Indices, 6 minute walk test, AMPPro, Timed Up and Go

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3D motion capture, wearable devices, and functional outcome measures

Gait evaluation, Hill and Stair Assessment Indices, 6 minute walk test, AMPPro, Timed Up and Go

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* any individual with unilateral transtibial limb loss
* a well-fitting prosthesis (as determined by a board-certified prosthetist through standardized prosthetic guidelines) for a minimum of one month
* able to achieve a "Level 6 - Modified Independence" score on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for 2 mobility items (locomotion and transfers)

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals with active wounds/ulcers or significant musculoskeletal comorbidities on their intact limb that would impair ability to participate in biomechanical evaluations
* any comorbidity that results in rapid limb volume changes (i.e., end stage renal disease with dialysis)
* a poorly fitting socket
* cognitive deficit(s) or mental pathology (e.g., dementia, amnesia) that would prevent the participant from understanding and following directions and limit the participant's ability to participate fully in the study
* women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant during their participation in study activities
* FIM scores less than Level 6 for locomotion and transfers

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No