Restoration of Normative Postural Control

NCT ID: NCT06452186

Last Updated: 2024-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2028-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this proposal is to investigate the effects of training to use direct electromyographic (dEMG) control of a powered prosthetic ankle on transtibial amputees'.

The aimed questions to answer:

1. whether dEMG control will improve balance and postural stability of amputees,
2. whether dEMG control will lead to more natural neuromuscular control and coordination, 3) whether dEMG control will reduce cognitive processes.

Participants will go through PT guided training on using dEMG controlled prosthetic ankles and are evaluated for their capability on functional tasks.

The results will be compared with a comparison group, which goes through the same training but with their everyday passive prostheses on balance capability, neuromuscular coordination, and cognitive load during locomotion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lab Visit Experience for Participants with lower limb amputation:

* Number of Lab Visits: 15 visits. Clinicians may recommend skipping some of the visits or tasks based on clinical evaluation and status of the participants.
* Length of Lab Visit: three hours maximum

1. First visit: the purpose of the first visit is to conduct consent and conduct measurements to decide walking speed and ABC (amputee balance confidence) score.
2. Second visit: this visit is to ensure that the amputees' own socket system can be integrated into the powered prosthetic leg and validate the effectiveness of the EMG interface.
3. Third and fourth visits: baseline evaluation with powered prosthesis and passive prosthesis. Each participant will finish the two visits. One of the visits is dedicated to their own passive prosthesis and the other visit is for the powered prosthesis. The sequence of the evaluation is randomized. The tasks conducted in the two visits are generally identical. The only difference is that one of the visits uses the participants' everyday prosthetic foot and the other uses the powered prosthetic ankle
4. Fifth and sixth visits: these visits are dedicated to have the participants trained to regain muscle coordination, which is critical to use the powered prosthetic ankle. All the participants will go through these trainings. Based on whether the participants are selected as the powered prosthetic group (Group A) or the passive group (Group B), the participants will finish this training with the powered prosthetic leg or a passive prosthetic leg.
5. Seven - eleventh visits: These visits are designed to give participants needed training, so participants are able to integrate the action of the powered prosthetic ankle with their full body motion for various tasks. To ensure that contribution of the training procedure to the performance changes are considered, all the participants will go through the training with the prostheses aligned with their group.
6. Twelfth-thirteenth visit (duplicate of Third and fourth visit). These visits are used to evaluate the impact of the training program on the performance of the participants to conduct tasks which are not included in the training procedure. Each participant will conduct the task with both passive and powered prosthetic legs on different days.
7. Fourteenth-fifteenth visits (duplicate of Third and fourth visit). These visits are used to understand the long term effects of the training program on the participants. These visits will be conducted three months after the 13th visits.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two groups amputees go through the same training procedure with different prostheses. Their functionality will be compared before and the after the training.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The PT, who evaluates the participants, is blinded for their previous training experience.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dEMG group

Patients go through the training procedure with the direct EMG controlled powered prosthetic ankle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

direct EMG controlled prosthetic ankle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients are trained to use the powered prosthetic ankles

PT guided prosthetic training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Amputees are trained to use prosthetic ankles

Passive group

Patients go through the training procedure with their own passive prosthetic ankles

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PT guided prosthetic training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Amputees are trained to use prosthetic ankles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

direct EMG controlled prosthetic ankle

Patients are trained to use the powered prosthetic ankles

Intervention Type DEVICE

PT guided prosthetic training

Amputees are trained to use prosthetic ankles

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older;
* unilateral bower limb amputee
* K-level 2 or higher (who are frequent prosthesis users and may benefit from the proposed prosthesis training and use of dEMG controlled powered prosthesis)
* Amputation occurred over 2 years ago
* At least 1 year of experience using their prosthetic leg
* Has used the current socket for at least 6 months without a significant skin issue or major modification
* Are willing to come to NC State University's Centennial Campus to participate in research and be photographed while doing research activities

Exclusion Criteria

* Have a very short residual shank (the length of the residual limb is ≤15% of the length of intact limb)
* Cannot perform functional ambulation in the community on a daily basis without assistive devices
* Cognitive or visual impairment that affects the participant's ability to provide informed consent or to follow simple instructions during the experiments
* Congenital amputees
* Amputees who use powered prosthetic ankles
* Weight more than 300lbs
* Pregnant Person
* Allergic to latex, which is often contained in medical tapes.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Carolina State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

He Huang

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

He Huang, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NC State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North Carolina State University

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory

Role: CONTACT

919-513-3840

Ming Liu, PhD

Role: CONTACT

919-515-8543

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

He Huang, PhD

Role: primary

919-515-5218

Laura Rohrbaugh

Role: backup

919-513-3840

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

26076

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neurocognitive Exercises for Ankle Instability
NCT06567847 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA