EQUITA - A Feasibility Trial of a Faith-placed Intervention to Increase Screening Uptake in Black Adults
NCT ID: NCT06981182
Last Updated: 2025-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-01
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will be invited to attend a two-hour workshop at each of the three study sites and will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group.
This 24-month feasibility study will inform the development of a full-scale randomised-controlled trial co-produced for Black people that uses culturally appropriate messages that support screening for early diagnosis in this underserved group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Youth-led Intervention to Reduce Healthcare Disparities in Cancer Screening
NCT07008781
Increasing Equity in Lung Cancer Screening
NCT06360822
Improving Health Literacy in African-American Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT03322891
Evaluating the Impact of an Equity Focused Dashboard and Clinical Support
NCT05278806
Co-Design and Pilot Testing of Peer-led Community Outreach to Improve Equity, Veteran-Centeredness and Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening
NCT06389981
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The EQUITA study builds on the IMCAN (Improving Muslim Women's CANcer Screening Uptake), and PROCAN-B ((Early diagnosis of PROstate CANcer for Black men) studies by using the same community-centred and participatory approach to apply a whole-community, multi-screening strategy to encourage uptake of breast, bowel, cervical, and AAA screening among Black communities. The intervention will retain the core elements of the participatory approach, including the Community Recruitment Leads on the research team, Public Involvement and Community Engagement (PICE) group for co-production, trained peer-facilitators, and faith-based engagement. The structured workshop format, which has demonstrated feasibility and acceptability in previous studies, will be tailored in collaboration with Black communities to ensure cultural relevance.
The study consists of six objectives with aligned work packages:
1. Can the existing intervention be adapted in partnership with a PICE group to improve engagement with breast, cervical, bowel, and AAA screening programmes in the Black community?
2. Can a two-arm cluster-randomised feasibility trial of the peer-led intervention be delivered in three sites: Leeds, North East of England and Scotland?
3. What are the perspectives of participants, peer facilitators, and key stakeholders on intervention and trial methodology, acceptability, and intervention implementation?
4. What is the feasibility trial's performance on key parameters and predefined progression criteria?
5. Is it feasible to conduct an economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention?
6. What are effective data dissemination strategies, and can the next phase be prepared by designing a study protocol for a definitive trial and logic model for implementation?
This feasibility trial will involve delivering a 2-hour workshop to 300 Black people (females aged 25-74 and males 50-74) in churches in Scotland, North East of England, and Leeds, who are either not or partially up to date with the screening they are eligible for. Participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention or control group at each site. A process evaluation, including focus groups and stakeholder interviews, will guide modifications to the trial and intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In-person Workshop
Participants will attend a co-produced 2-hour workshop delivered at a church at either sites; North East of England, Leeds and Scotland.
Faith-placed intervention to promote breast, cervical, bowel, and AAA screening uptake in Black communities.
The intervention includes a two-hour workshop, delivered in person to the entire congregation, that aims to promote the uptake of breast, cervical, bowel, and AAA screening among Black communities in the North East of England, Leeds and Scotland. However, we will only include effectiveness data (i.e., surveys and screening uptake) from those who meet the study eligibility criteria. The intervention will be a peer-led, multidimensional community workshop. It will incorporate multiple components that tackle barriers to screening and that are present in the existing IMCAN and PROCAN-B interventions, if the PICE group believe these are helpful, such as health education about breast, cervical, bowel and AAA screening delivered by a healthcare provider with an opportunity to ask questions, personal testimonials through survivors' stories, as well as members of the community discussing experiences of screening, and utilising community and peer support and religious leaders.
No workshop
The control group will have regular church sessions and will be wait listed. They will receive the intervention after data collection is complete.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Faith-placed intervention to promote breast, cervical, bowel, and AAA screening uptake in Black communities.
The intervention includes a two-hour workshop, delivered in person to the entire congregation, that aims to promote the uptake of breast, cervical, bowel, and AAA screening among Black communities in the North East of England, Leeds and Scotland. However, we will only include effectiveness data (i.e., surveys and screening uptake) from those who meet the study eligibility criteria. The intervention will be a peer-led, multidimensional community workshop. It will incorporate multiple components that tackle barriers to screening and that are present in the existing IMCAN and PROCAN-B interventions, if the PICE group believe these are helpful, such as health education about breast, cervical, bowel and AAA screening delivered by a healthcare provider with an opportunity to ask questions, personal testimonials through survivors' stories, as well as members of the community discussing experiences of screening, and utilising community and peer support and religious leaders.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Self-identify as Black,
* Female aged 25-74,
* Male aged 50-74,
* Not up to date with all screening tests for which they are eligible, e.g., women who are up to date with one form of screening (e.g., breast) will be eligible for recruitment if they are not up to date with others (e.g., cervical or bowel).
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals who do not self-identify as Black
* Do not self-identity as Black
* Females aged outside the range of 25-74
* Males aged outside the range of 50-74.
* Individuals who are up to date with all screening tests for which they are eligible.
25 Years
74 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Glasgow
OTHER
University of Sunderland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Floor Christie-de Jong
Associate Professor in Public Health for Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Leeds Beckett University
Leeds, , United Kingdom
University of Sunderland
Sunderland, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
NIHR Funding Award
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
164073
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NIHR 164073
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.