l Investigation of Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) With Skywalker and Evolution Medial Pivot Knee (eMP Knee)
NCT ID: NCT06969222
Last Updated: 2025-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
122 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-05
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04982198
Comparison of Two Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems
NCT06284824
Study to Evaluate Patient Outcomes and Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacements Versus Conventional Unicompartmental Knee for Subjects With Primary Arthritis of the Knee Joint Involving One (UKA) Compartment (Medial or Lateral)
NCT06036212
Evaluation of Two Surgical Strategies for Robotic Implantation of Total Knee Prostheses (Stryker), Cemented Versus Uncemented
NCT04692714
MAKO Total Knee Artroplasty
NCT05744895
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who have received eMP knees with conventional instrumentations or non-MP TKAs (retrospective)
Inclusion Criteria:
1. \>= 18 Years Male or Female
2. With noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, inflammatory joint disease, functional deformity
3. The subject has signed the Ethical Board approved Informed Consent Form specific to this study prior to enrollment
4. Must be independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Subjects with poor compliance, unable to complete the trial according to the requirements or for other reasons or considered not to be suitable for inclusion by investigators.
2. Concurrent participation in any other total hip or knee replacement studies.
Study Objectives: Evaluate Safety and Performance of RA-TKA with Skywalker and eMP knee and address research questions include but not limited to:
1. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Skywalker with eMP knee
2. Learning Curve of adopting Skywalker with eMP knees
3. Postop function recovery in eMP patients with Skywalker
4. Safety of eMP knee with Skywalker based on intra-op and postop complications
5. (Enhanced) Kinematics of eMP with Skywalker compared to manual and other non MP TKA
Study Endpoints Primary Effectiveness Endpoints
* FJS and OKS at 12 months
* Kinematics from RSA at min 6 months
Primary Safety Endpoint
* Revisions / surgical interventions including MUA on the index knee due to any reasons
* Serious Adverse Events that require hospitalization
Secondary Endpoint
* Accuracy based on planned vs actual size and alignment parameters
* FJS at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
* OKS at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
* ROM from KSS at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months
* Learning Curve based on surgical time
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic-assisted Skywalker device - Evolution Medial Pivot
Robotic TKA
Total knee replacement of arthritic knees either with robotic-assisted Skywalker device
Conventional total knee arthroplasty with manual instruments - device - Evolution Medial Pivot
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic TKA
Total knee replacement of arthritic knees either with robotic-assisted Skywalker device
Conventional TKA
Total knee replacement of arthritic knees performed manually
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. With noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, inflammatory joint disease, functional deformity
3. The subject has signed the Ethical Board approved Informed Consent Form specific to this study prior to enrollment
4. Must be independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Concurrent participation in any other total hip or knee replacement studies.
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.
INDUSTRY
Orthopaedic Department of General University Hospital of Laria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Theofilos Karachalios
Professor of Orthopaedics, Head of Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital of Larisa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Larisa
Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Theofilos Karachalios, MD,PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Karachalios T, Varitimidis S, Bargiotas K, Hantes M, Roidis N, Malizos KN. An 11- to 15-year clinical outcome study of the Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty: pivot knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1050-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.36208.
St Mart JP, Goh EL. The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):270-279. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200052. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Siddiqi A, Horan T, Molloy RM, Bloomfield MR, Patel PD, Piuzzi NS. A clinical review of robotic navigation in total knee arthroplasty: historical systems to modern design. EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):252-269. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200071. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
50377/24-11-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.