AI-Designed Clear Aligners: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT06968325
Last Updated: 2025-05-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-25
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Do TruRoot-designed aligners achieve more accurate root positioning compared to conventional aligners?
Is there a significant difference in clinical parameters such as root resorption, pain levels, treatment duration, and occlusal outcomes between the two groups?
Is the TruRoot AI-based design a valid and clinically applicable method for planning clear aligner treatment?
Researchers will compare:
An AI-based TruRoot group, where aligners are planned using CBCT and intraoral scan superimposition to estimate true root position
A Conventional group, where aligners are designed using intraoral scans only, with expert evaluation to ensure roots remain within the alveolar bone
Participants will:
Receive clear aligner treatment based on either the TruRoot AI system or conventional planning by experts
Undergo CBCT and intraoral scans at baseline and post-treatment
Be assessed for root position accuracy, validity of AI-generated treatment plans, occlusal outcomes via the ABO Objective Grading System, root resorption, self-reported pain, and treatment duration
Attend regular follow-ups throughout the treatment period
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment Outcome of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Four Premolar Extraction Cases
NCT07236775
SmartArch vs Super Elastic NiTi Aligning Archwires
NCT05510206
Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligner
NCT06410105
Effects of Micro-osteoperforations on Lower Anterior Crowding Using Clear Aligners
NCT07169968
Efficiency, Efficacy, Periodontal & Occlusal Outcomes for Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in Crowded Incisor Treatment
NCT06731465
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary aim is to assess whether AI-driven root-based treatment planning offers superior clinical outcomes in terms of root accuracy, treatment efficiency, root resorption, pain perception, and occlusal quality. Post-treatment assessments will include CBCT imaging, root position analysis, and occlusal outcome evaluation using the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Objective Grading System.
A comprehensive digital workflow will be applied throughout the study:
CRANEX® software will be used for generating high-resolution CBCT slice data.
BlueSky Plan or AI-based CephX® Web Viewer will be employed for segmentation and 3D modeling of dental and skeletal structures.
Clear aligner designs will be generated through BlueSky Plan software or 3Shape Clear Aligner Studio, incorporating the AI-based TruRoot protocol in the experimental group.
OnDemand 3D software will be used to evaluate root positioning within the alveolar bone post-treatment.
Geomagic® Control X™ will be utilized to quantify tooth movement and assess root volume changes throughout the treatment course.
This study will generate clinical data to validate the use of AI-powered root-based planning protocols in aligner therapy and compare them to conventional expert-driven methods
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AI-based TruRoot group
This intervention is distinguished by its use of an AI-based treatment planning protocol that incorporates both CBCT and intraoral scan data for accurate root position estimation.
AI-based TruRoot group:
Participants in this group will receive clear aligner treatment designed using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system called TruRoot
Conventional clear aligner group
This intervention differs from the AI-based approach by using only intraoral scans for treatment planning, without incorporating CBCT data. Clear aligners are designed manually by experienced orthodontists based on clinical judgment and standard digital models.
Conventional clear aligner group
Participants in this group will receive clear aligner treatment planned manually by expert orthodontists based only on intraoral scans.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AI-based TruRoot group:
Participants in this group will receive clear aligner treatment designed using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system called TruRoot
Conventional clear aligner group
Participants in this group will receive clear aligner treatment planned manually by expert orthodontists based only on intraoral scans.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Adult patient with an age range 18-30 with fully erupted all permanent dentitions excluding third molars.
3. Skeletal and dental Cl I malocclusion with moderate crowding (little irregularity index 4-6 mm).
4. The treatment plan should be non-extraction treatment.
5. No history of trauma or root resorption
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject with poor oral hygiene.
3. Defective and missing teeth.
4. Presence of any deep bite or open bite problems,
5. History of trauma, root resorptions and dilacerated roots.
6. Medical conditions affecting tooth movement or bone metabolism.
7. previous extraction or history of previous orthodontic treatment.
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Baghdad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Abdulhussain Abbas
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dheaa Hussein Al-Groosh, Ph.D. Orthodontics
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
College of dentistry - University of baghdad
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
College of Dentistry, University of dentistry
Baghdad, , Iraq
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1013425
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.