Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT06950593

Last Updated: 2025-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-18

Study Completion Date

2027-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (TESS) on the recovery of post-stroke individuals who have upper limb hemiparesis. It will compare outcomes measures between individuals who receive upper limb task specific training with TESS and individuals who receive task specific training of the upper limb with Sham, or fake, TESS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Upper limb (UL) hemiparesis is the most common post-stroke disability. Currently, there is no treatment used in the clinic that has shown to be efficacious for 75% of individuals who have moderate to severe UL hemiparesis. There are no interventions for individuals with moderate to severe hemiparesis that have demonstrated superiority in comparison to standard care. These stroke patients often have increased spasticity and muscle weakness, resulting in chronic upper limb dysfunction. We are proposing an alternative strategy to improve upper limb function after stroke: transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (TESS). Our objective is to evaluate the feasibility and neural effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation plus task specific training in a two-arm study with three time points (pre-/post-intervention and follow-up). We will recruit 14 chronic post-stroke participants who will receive 15 sessions of either TESS plus task specific training or Sham TESS plus task specific training. Our long-term research goal is to use TESS as a therapeutic strategy, combined with task specific training, to improve upper limb impairment and function in chronic stroke survivors. Our central hypothesis is that excitation of spinal circuitry by spinal stimulation will result in more effective motor control that will improve volitional upper limb movement (as compared to sham stimulation plus task specific training). This hypothesis is based on published work in cervical spinal cord injury.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Limb Hemiparesis Following Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This interventional study uses a randomized, single-blind (evaluator masked), parallel, two-arm experimental design with an appropriate active comparator.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
During treatment sessions, both the experimental group and the active comparator group receive the same task specific training protocol as well as don the TESS system. For the active comparator group, the TESS will be turned on to a threshold level of sensation. The participant will be told that the stimulation is being lowered to a below-threshold level, at which point it will be turned off for the rest of the session. This will allow the participants to remain blinded. It is not possible to perform the protocol with blinded treatment therapists. The blinded evaluator is not present during the treatment sessions and will not be told which group the participant is in.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group

This group receives task specific training and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TESS) during treatment sessions. TESS is applied via electrodes placed vertically over the spinous processes of C5-C6. The stimulation will be adjusted within a range of 10mA to 100mA based on participant tolerance and will be delivered for 30 minutes per training session.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Task Specific Training (TST)

Intervention Type OTHER

Task specific training activities are types of activities that may be used in standard of care for stroke rehabilitation. Tasks will be completed in sitting or standing. As is usual in studies for upper limb hemiparesis, study participants will be picking up objects with their affected hands. They will work on grasp, grasp-lift of objects, release of objects, reaching and grasping, and reaching without grasping.

Transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TESS)

Intervention Type OTHER

The Digitimer DS8R Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Neurostimulator will deliver transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation. The stimulus intensity used during the intervention will be determined based on individual maximum tolerance. We expect this current amplitude to be between 10mA and 100mA. Stimulation time will be standardized to a 30min duration during which the participant will perform task specific training tasks.

Comparator Group

This group receives task specific training without real TESS during treatment sessions. Instead, they receive Sham TESS, which is a placebo version in which the electrodes are applied and the stimulation is turned on so that the patient can feel it, and then ramped down to zero for the duration of the session.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Task Specific Training (TST)

Intervention Type OTHER

Task specific training activities are types of activities that may be used in standard of care for stroke rehabilitation. Tasks will be completed in sitting or standing. As is usual in studies for upper limb hemiparesis, study participants will be picking up objects with their affected hands. They will work on grasp, grasp-lift of objects, release of objects, reaching and grasping, and reaching without grasping.

Sham transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (Sham TESS)

Intervention Type OTHER

The Sham TESS intervention will utilize the same device and setup as the true TESS intervention. However, after turning on the stimulation and reaching the appropriate intensity, the stimulation will be ramped down and turned off for the remainder of the treatment session. The participant will be told that the stimulation was brought down to a sub-threshold level in order to maintain treatment group blinding.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Task Specific Training (TST)

Task specific training activities are types of activities that may be used in standard of care for stroke rehabilitation. Tasks will be completed in sitting or standing. As is usual in studies for upper limb hemiparesis, study participants will be picking up objects with their affected hands. They will work on grasp, grasp-lift of objects, release of objects, reaching and grasping, and reaching without grasping.

Intervention Type OTHER

Transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TESS)

The Digitimer DS8R Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Neurostimulator will deliver transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation. The stimulus intensity used during the intervention will be determined based on individual maximum tolerance. We expect this current amplitude to be between 10mA and 100mA. Stimulation time will be standardized to a 30min duration during which the participant will perform task specific training tasks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (Sham TESS)

The Sham TESS intervention will utilize the same device and setup as the true TESS intervention. However, after turning on the stimulation and reaching the appropriate intensity, the stimulation will be ramped down and turned off for the remainder of the treatment session. The participant will be told that the stimulation was brought down to a sub-threshold level in order to maintain treatment group blinding.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* able and willing to give written consent and comply with study procedures
* at least 6 months post-stroke
* hemiplegia secondary to stroke
* UE Fugle Meyer Assessment \<35
* not currently receiving regular occupational therapy services
* participant has received clearance from physician to participate in study
* participant has at least a rudimentary comprehension of English

Exclusion Criteria

* botox injection in upper extremity within the last 4 months
* modified ashworth score of 4 in any joint of the affected limb
* pregnant or nursing
* using a powered, implanted cardiac device for monitoring or support of heart function (i.e. pacemaker, defibrillator, or LVAD), or anti-spasticity implantable pumps, or cochlear implants
* unhealed bone fractures
* severe contractures in the upper extremities
* active cancer or cancer remission less than 5 years
* orthopedic dysfunction, injury, or surgery that would impact the individual's ability to use the upper extremities
* recent procedure or operation of the spinal cord within the past year
* traumatic brain injury or neurological conditions that would impact the study
* skull fracture that has developed within the past 6 months
* non-English speakers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mary Ellen Stoykov

Research Scientist, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mary Ellen Stoykov, PhD, OT

Role: CONTACT

773-704-2422

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D; EXCITE Investigators. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 1;296(17):2095-104. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17077374 (View on PubMed)

Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1135616 (View on PubMed)

Barreca S, Gowland CK, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, Torresin W, Dunkley M, Miller P, Masters L. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004 Fall;11(4):31-42. doi: 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15592988 (View on PubMed)

Benavides FD, Jo HJ, Lundell H, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko Y, Perez MA. Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia. J Neurosci. 2020 Mar 25;40(13):2633-2643. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2374-19.2020. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31996455 (View on PubMed)

Stoykov ME, King E, David FJ, Vatinno A, Fogg L, Corcos DM. Bilateral motor priming for post stroke upper extremity hemiparesis: A randomized pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2020;38(1):11-22. doi: 10.3233/RNN-190943.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31609714 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31609714/

This source provides further explanation of the procedure for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the upper extremities.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17077374/

Provides information about current treatment options for stroke patients and their efficacy in helping to restore function of the upper limbs.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1135616/

This source describes the Fugl-Meyer evaluation method and how this method has been validated for evaluation of the upper limb.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15592988/

This source provides information about the CAHAI evaluation method, specifically about the development of the measure and how the included tests were selected.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31996455/

This source outlines a procedure to determine the presence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the upper extremity. This information was used to help us design our protocol.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00220717

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS and Robotic Therapy in Stroke
NCT01828398 COMPLETED PHASE2