Vaginal Cleansing With Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine for Prevention of Endometritis
NCT ID: NCT06936475
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
239 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-01
2020-09-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vaginal Preparation With Chlorhexidine-alcohol vs. Povidine-iodine vs. Saline
NCT03640507
Chlorhexidine vs. Iodine for Vaginal Preparation in Urogynecologic Procedures
NCT04048356
Vaginal Preparation Prior to Hysterectomy
NCT03412734
Efficacy of Two Vaginal Solutions in Preoperative Use
NCT03014778
Evaluation of Gynecological Acceptability of a Health Care Product
NCT04247022
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AIM: To compare the effectiveness of post-operative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine versus chlorhexidinegluconate in reducing post-caesarean maternal endometritis at the Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (AEFUTHA).
METHODOLOGY: This was a single blinded randomized controlled trial involving two hundred and forty four (244) consenting pregnant women booked for emergency lower segment Caesarean section at AEFUTHA and Mile 4 Hospital, Abakaliki; with 122 women randomized into the Povidone-iodine arm (control arm) and 122 into the Chlorhexidinegluconate arm. Both groups received prophylactic antibiotics and anterior abdominal wall scrubbing. The control group received post-operative vaginal cleansing with Povidone iodine while study group received chlorhexidinegluconate. immediately after skin closure. Subsequently, they were reviewed for endometritis daily till discharge or up to 7 days for patients who had the need to stay up to 7 days or beyond. Data was analyzed using statistical Package for Social Science (IBM SPSS) software (version 24, Chicago II, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (Mean ± 2SD), while categorical variables were presented as numbers, frequencies and percentages. Student t test was used for comparison between groups for continuous variables and mean of the two groups. Chi-square test was used for comparison between groups for categorical variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Povidone group
In the povidone group, vaginal cleansing was done with 3 pieces of gauze on a sponge holding forceps soaked in 30ml of 5% povidone-iodine for each patient. The soaked gauze was inserted into the vagina, rotated 360o for 30 seconds from the upper to the lower vaginal wall. This was done when clots had been evacuated from the vagina with dry gauze on a sponge holding forceps according to departmental protocol.
Povidone-Iodine
5% povidone iodine
Chlorhexidine group
In the chlorhexidine group, vaginal cleansing was done with 3 pieces of gauze on a sponge holding forceps soaked in 30ml of 0.5% chlorhexidine for each patient. The soaked gauze was inserted into the vagina, rotated 360o for 30 seconds from the upper to the lower vaginal wall. This was done when clots had been evacuated from the vagina with dry gauze on a sponge holding forceps according to departmental protocol.
Chlorhexidine Gluconate
0.5% chlorhexidine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Povidone-Iodine
5% povidone iodine
Chlorhexidine Gluconate
0.5% chlorhexidine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Emergency caesarean sections for women in labour, with ruptured membrane or cord prolapse.
* Pregnant women that gave consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Known allergy to povidone iodine or chlorhexidinegluconate
* Diabetes mellitus/ glucose intolerance undergoing elective caesarean section.
* Asymptomatic placenta praevia undergoing elective caesarean section
* Patients who have chorioamnionitis
* Immunosuppressive conditions like AIDS, steroid use
* Patients who have coexisting uterine fibroid.
15 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Assumpta Nnenna Nweke
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital
Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FETHA/REC/VOL2/2019/294
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.