Vaginal Preparation Prior to Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT03412734

Last Updated: 2021-01-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-18

Study Completion Date

2020-01-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized controlled trial to determine the influence of chlorhexidine gluconate surgical/topical antiseptic solutions on the bacterial environment of the vagina during hysterectomy and compare that to the effect of standard iodine-based preparations on the same.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postoperative infection remains the most common complication of surgical procedures in gynecology. Historically, 30-40% of patients undergoing a hysterectomy develop a post-operative infection. The initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis for appropriate surgical procedures was a significant advancement in the prevention of surgical site infection.

Antibiotic prophylaxis has been standardized and universally implemented. A remaining variable is the method of aseptic preparation of the vagina with substantial variation of technique being reported even within institutions.

The most recent Committee Opinion by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists concludes there is insufficient evidence to render a strong recommendation for either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine as the ideal agent for surgical preparation of the vagina and that further evidence is necessary.

Povidone-iodine solution has been considered the standard for aseptic surgical preparation of the vagina for decades and is the only solution approved by the FDA for vaginal use. There are however specific qualities of the solution that suggest it may be less than ideal for use in the vagina. More contemporary efforts have begun to focus on chlorhexidine as a more ideal agent for aseptic efforts in surgical preparation of the vagina.

The purpose of our study is to use a randomized controlled trial to determine if chlorhexidine gluconate surgical preparation maintains a lower rate of contamination to the surgical field.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hysterectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chlorhexidine group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorhexidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Chlorhexidine preparation solutions

Iodine group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Iodine

Intervention Type DRUG

Iodine-based preparation solutions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chlorhexidine

Chlorhexidine preparation solutions

Intervention Type DRUG

Iodine

Iodine-based preparation solutions

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing total vaginal, laparoscopic assisted vaginal, total laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates or Tri-State Gynecology Oncology TriHealth Inc.
* Concomitant procedures such as vaginal vault suspension, suburethral sling, cystoscopy, enterocele repair, anterior or posterior colporrhaphy, bilateral salpingectomy or salpingooophorectomy, staging procedures, lymph node sampling and other indicated procedures will be included
* English speaking
* Ability to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Unwillingness to participate in the study
* Non English speaking
* Patients that do not undergo a hysterectomy
* Reported allergy to iodine or chlorhexidine preparation solutions
* Patients undergoing planned debulking surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancers
* Current infection necessitating hysterectomy
* Active sepsis, pelvic abscess or pelvic inflammatory disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TriHealth Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Catrina Crisp, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Good Samaritan Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):297-301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1706728 (View on PubMed)

Hill AM, Pauls RN, Basil J, Tam T, Yook E, Shatkin-Margolis A, Kleeman S, Yeung J, Aldrich E, Crisp CC. Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine for Vaginal Preparation Before Hysterectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Feb 1;28(2):77-84. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001066.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34333502 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-102

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Improving Menstrual and VAginal Health for All
NCT06646185 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA