Metacognitive Therapy for Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Primary Care, Blended Version of Mediated Treatment

NCT ID: NCT06928428

Last Updated: 2025-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-10

Study Completion Date

2027-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate a new format of metacognitive therapy (MCT) for primary care patients with depression or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) called blended MCT (bMCT). What is new about bMCT is that it is given both via the internet and through meetings with a therapist. In this study, we first want to investigate if it is feasible to deliver bMCT in primary health care to patients with depression or GAD. Secondly, we want to investigate whether the format of bMCT can provide as good treatment effects as only personally mediated MCT.

The content of both formats of treatment is based on MCT methods for depression and GAD which have shown to be effective in previous research studies. bMCT means to work with the treatment independently via an internet platform and to meet the therapist for therapy sessions up to 6 times during the course of the treatment. Meetings will take place at the primary care center or via video call. As part of the treatment are mediated via the internet, participants need to have access to an Internet-connected computer/electronic device and be able to work with the material about 3 hours per week during the course of the treatment. Standard MCT involves seeing the therapist for 8-12 treatment sessions at the primary care center or via video call.

In the first study, all patients diagnosed with depression or GAD at Liljeholmen primary care center, after giving informed consent, will receive bMCT. In the second study, more primary health care centers will be involved and participants will be randomly allocated to either bMCT or standard MCT.

The active treatment lasts for 8-12 weeks. The treatment is estimated to involve approximately 3 hours of therapy work per week. Participants will be asked to fill in questionnaires before the treatment, weekly during the treatment, immediately after the treatment (post-treatment) and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months after post-treatment. The forms contain questions about your well-being, background and experience of the treatment. Filling in questionnaires is estimated to take 30 minutes on four measurement occasions. Participating also means giving permission for treatment conversations to be audio recorded. The recording is coded so that independent assessors can examine the therapists' competence, and see that the therapists follow the instructions for the current treatment method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study 1. Feasibility study: Outcome measures of acceptability, feasibility and compliance:

a. What percentage of surveyed patients choose to participate in bMCT? b. What is the dropout rate, given reasons for dropping out? c. How many modules do the patients complete, from 1 to 8? d. patient satisfaction with treatment (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, CSQ-8, range from 8 low satisfaction to 32 high satisfaction) d. Any reported negative effects of treatment e. Adherence and competence in delivering MCT sessions (MCT-Competence Scale, MCT-CS, 18 items, scale 0-5)

Study1: Experience and Usability, qualitative method:

1. How are bMCT and treatment materials experienced by patients and therapists respectively?
2. What facilitates and hinders the implementation of bMCT?

Study1: Preliminary clinical effects:

1. symptoms of depression (PHQ-9, 0-27), symptoms of GAD (PSWQ, 16-80)
2. quality of life (5-item Satisfaction with Life Scale, SWLS, 0-35)

d. functional level (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, WHODAS, 0-48) e. self-assessed ability to work (Work Ability Index, WAI 0-10)

Study 2: randomized controlled study, additional measurements of acceptability, feasibility, compliance: Varies

1. proportion completed modules between groups?
2. percentage dropouts between groups?
3. therapist competence and adherence to MCT between groups?
4. patient satisfaction with treatment (CSQ-8, range from 8 low satisfaction to 32 high satisfaction)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression NOS Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Study 1: Feasibility will be performed in single group
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blended metacognitive therapy (bMCT)

Blended metacognitive therapy (bMCT): New about this treatment is that it is given both via the internet and through meetings with a therapist. Participants work with the treatment independently via an internet platform and meet their therapist for therapy sessions up to 6 times during the course of the treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Metacognitive therapy, blended format

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Blended metacognitive therapy (bMCT): New about this treatment is that it is given both via the internet and through meetings with a therapist. Participants work with the treatment independently via an internet platform and meets their therapist for therapy sessions up to 6 times during the course of the treatment. Key components of the original manual are retained, but adapted to better fit the digital format. A handbook for therapists is developed to facilitate the implementation of the blended format and optimize execution. The digital parts of the treatment for depression and GAD consist of 10 interactive modules located in the Support and Treatment (SoB) platform. The sessions are divided in a flexible way between physical and digital sessions that therapist and patient agree on. The patient has access to all modules but receive instructions from their therapist which module is relevant for each week. During the treatment, the patient can write text messages to his/her therapist.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Metacognitive therapy, blended format

Blended metacognitive therapy (bMCT): New about this treatment is that it is given both via the internet and through meetings with a therapist. Participants work with the treatment independently via an internet platform and meets their therapist for therapy sessions up to 6 times during the course of the treatment. Key components of the original manual are retained, but adapted to better fit the digital format. A handbook for therapists is developed to facilitate the implementation of the blended format and optimize execution. The digital parts of the treatment for depression and GAD consist of 10 interactive modules located in the Support and Treatment (SoB) platform. The sessions are divided in a flexible way between physical and digital sessions that therapist and patient agree on. The patient has access to all modules but receive instructions from their therapist which module is relevant for each week. During the treatment, the patient can write text messages to his/her therapist.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed depressive episode/recurrent depression (ICD code F32., F33.), or generalized anxiety disorder (ICD code F41.1) as primary diagnosis
* Informed consent
* Access to the internet
* Age ≥18 years
* In the event of psychopharmaceutical medication (e.g. antidepressants), the dosage must have been stable at least 4 years before inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Other psychiatric condition in need of immediate treatment and/or assessed to be the patient\'s primary problem (e.g. bipolar disorder, psychosis, alcohol or substance use syndrome or severe eating disorder),
* Other ongoing psychological treatment
* Insufficient knowledge of the Swedish language (e.g. that an interpreter is needed during patient visits), cognitive failure or insufficient computer skills to be able to assimilate the text-based digital part of the treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Region Stockholm

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sandra af Winklerfelt Hammarberg, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Region Stockholm and Karolinska Institutet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Liljeholmen primary care center, Academic Primary care center, SLSO, Region Stockholm

Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26978655 (View on PubMed)

Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G, Quigley L, Kleiboer A, Dobson KS. A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;58(7):376-85. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800702.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23870719 (View on PubMed)

van der Heiden C, Muris P, van der Molen HT. Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and intolerance-of-uncertainty therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Feb;50(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22222208 (View on PubMed)

Andersson G, Titov N, Dear BF, Rozental A, Carlbring P. Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation. World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):20-28. doi: 10.1002/wps.20610.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30600624 (View on PubMed)

Hedman E, Ljotsson B, Lindefors N. Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Dec;12(6):745-64. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.67.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23252357 (View on PubMed)

Af Winklerfelt Hammarberg S, Toth-Pal E, Jansson-Frojmark M, Lundgren T, Westman J, Bohman B. Intolerance-of-uncertainty therapy versus metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder in primary health care: A randomized controlled pilot trial. PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0287171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287171. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37315099 (View on PubMed)

Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A, Li J, Andersson G. Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med. 2010 Dec;40(12):1943-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000772. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20406528 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FoUI-990130

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.