Exposure Therapy vs. Standardized Education for Distress Related to Somatic Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT04942028
Last Updated: 2025-04-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
161 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-07
2025-01-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Exposure-Based Treatment for Undifferentiated Somatic Symptom Disorder
NCT04511286
Evidence-Based Psychological Treatment for Emotional Disorders Attended in Dominican Primary Care Units (PsicAP)
NCT04642092
A Comparison of Two Ultra-brief Interventions in Primary Care for Patients With Anxiety, Depression, and Stress.
NCT05946382
CBT vs RTW Intervention for Patients With Common Subclinical Mental Illness in Primary Care
NCT01667809
Transdiagnostic Online CBT Vs. Care As Usual for Primary Care Patients with Common Mental Disorders
NCT06804941
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Psychological factors - in particular the preoccupation with symptoms - have been found to affect the perception and intensity of a large number of physical symptoms, both with and without a clear medical genesis. In pain, it has for example been found that fear and the preoccupation with symptoms can have a more substantial predictive value for chronicity than pain itself. In general, in individuals who suffer from clinically significant symptom preoccupation, behaviors intended to evaluate symptoms, seek information about symptoms, or avoid discomfort have been found to often contribute to worsened function and increased symptom burden in the long term.
This makes exposure, where the patient willingly and systematically approaches stimuli that give rise to unwanted symptoms or discomfort while refraining from acting on symptoms, a logical intervention. There are several examples where exposure-based treatment has been found to be efficacious when protocols were written to suit a particular group of patients where distress associated with somatic symptoms is common, e.g., a particular functional somatic syndrome in terms of fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome, or a chronic somatic condition such as asthma or atrial fibrillation. Typically, effects on symptoms and the preoccupation with symptoms have been large, and there is evidence to suggests that a reduction in somatic symptom burden may have been mediated by a reduction in symptom preoccupation or behaviors that serve to reduce distress in the short term.
Generalist primary care clinics typically do not have the resources necessary for administering specific psychological treatments for a large number specific functional somatic syndromes or chronic somatic conditions. The investigators suspect that a more general treatment protocol that can be tailored to suit a wide spectrum of physical symptoms could dramatically improve access to exposure-based treatment for patients with distress related to somatic symptoms. This may be particularly true if treatment can be delivered via the internet, which requires less therapist time but often results in similar effects as face-to-face treatment.
The investigators recently completed a feasibility trial at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden (NCT04511286), where the investigators found that an internet-delivered flexible exposure-based treatment for individuals with high levels of symptom preoccupation regardless of somatic symptom domain (N=33; e.g., functional gastrointestinal symptoms, atrial fibrillation, migraine) can be delivered with high treatment adherence, adequate client satisfaction, large and lasting improvement in self-reported somatic symptoms and symptom preoccupation, and no serious adverse events. It is thus motivated to evaluate this treatment format further.
In further evaluating the flexible exposure-based treatment approach for patients with distress related to somatic symptoms it is imperative to conduct a randomized controlled trial versus an informative control condition, focusing on effects on somatic symptoms and symptom preoccupation. It is also important to evaluate if the treatment can be effective in a routine clinical setting and when patients are referred via a clinician such as a general practitioner. In this trial, the investigators aim to evaluate if flexible internet-delivered exposure-based treatment is more effective than an internet-delivered standardized routine care education program for patients with distress related to somatic symptoms in primary care.
* Primary research question:
Compared to the control condition, does flexible internet-delivered exposure-based treatment lead to a larger average improvement in self-rated somatic symptom burden as assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire 15 (PHQ-15)? Hypothesis: Yes.
* Key secondary research questions:
Compared to the control condition, does flexible internet-delivered exposure-based treatment lead to a larger average improvement in symptom preoccupation, psychiatric symptom burden, and functional impairment? Hypothesis: Yes.
In flexible internet-delivered exposure-based treatment, are effects typically maintained up to 12 months after treatment? Hypothesis: Yes.
Is flexible internet-delivered exposure-based treatment cost-effective compared to the control condition? Hypothesis: Yes.
Is the controlled effect of the flexible exposure-based treatment on self-rated somatic symptoms moderated by baseline symptoms and preoccupation? Hypothesis: Yes.
Is the effect of the flexible exposure-based treatment on self-rated somatic symptom burden mediated by a reduction in symptom preoccupation? Hypothesis: Yes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Internet-delivered exposure-based treatment
10 weeks of therapist-guided exposure-based treatment delivered via the Internet.
Exposure
Systematic confrontation with stimuli associated with symptom-related distress, to achieve therapeutic changes in cognitions or behavior
Internet-delivered standardized education and prolonged assessment
10 weeks of therapist-guided intervention based on prolonged assessment and routine care educational material delivered via the Internet.
Standardized education
Standardized routine care education for individuals suffering from distress related to somatic symptoms, primarily focusing on healthy lifestyle behaviors such as sleep, diet, and exercise
Prolonged assessment
Patients are encouraged to keep a rudimentary symptom diary to track if and how their symptoms interact with mood and lifestyle behaviors
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exposure
Systematic confrontation with stimuli associated with symptom-related distress, to achieve therapeutic changes in cognitions or behavior
Standardized education
Standardized routine care education for individuals suffering from distress related to somatic symptoms, primarily focusing on healthy lifestyle behaviors such as sleep, diet, and exercise
Prolonged assessment
Patients are encouraged to keep a rudimentary symptom diary to track if and how their symptoms interact with mood and lifestyle behaviors
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Interested in completing an intense psychological treatment with the aim of reducing distress associated with physical symptoms
* Adult (≥18 years old)
* Living in Stockholm County
* Can read and write in Swedish
* Complete baseline assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe psychiatric condition or suicidal ideation
* Clear medical risk in taking part in exposure-based treatment (e.g., pregnancy) or somatic condition (e.g., recent cancer diagnosis), or treatment for somatic condition (e.g., recent chemotherapy), makes treatment unfeasible
* Continuous psychotropic medication (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, mood-stabilizers, antipsychotics) not stable in past 4 weeks, or not expected to remain stable over the main phase of the trial
* Severe alcohol or substance use disorder likely to interfere with treatment
* Planned absence for more than 1 week during the intended main phase
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Region Stockholm
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Erland Axelsson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Liljeholmen academic primary care clinic, Region Stockholm
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Liljeholmen academic primary care clinic
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: Study protocol with rudimentary SAP
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Detailed SAP for primary publication
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Detailed SAP for secondary analysis of cost-effectiveness
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Detailed SAP for secondary analysis of mediators
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Simple exposure protocol administered over 10 weeks
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-01400
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.