Patient-driven Internet Delivered Psychological Treatment
NCT ID: NCT04688567
Last Updated: 2023-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-01
2021-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Few studies have evaluated patient involvement in iCBT-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the effect of patient-driven iCBT-treatment for patients with anxiety disorders seeking primary care in a randomized controlled trial. The study investigates the effect of patient-driven iCBT treatment of perceptions of being able to control the treatment and on drop-out from treatment. In addition, secondary research questions investigate measures of empowerment, anxiety and depression symptoms, general disability, satisfaction with treatment and feelings of being able to cope with one's mental illness in patient-driven iCBT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Peer-supported Internet Mediated Psychological Treatment
NCT04244617
Tailored Internet-delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Primary Care
NCT01591720
Transdiagnostic Online CBT Vs. Care As Usual for Primary Care Patients with Common Mental Disorders
NCT06804941
Internet-Based CBT for Children With Anxiety Disorders: Implementation in Clinical Settings
NCT02350257
Internet-administrated Treatment of Anxiety Symptoms for Young Adults
NCT01402258
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary research questions:
1. Is there a difference between participants in patient-driven digital psychological treatment, compared to standardized internet CBT, in perceptions of how much they've been able to control their treatment (measured with a questionnaire developed by the researchers for this study)?
2. What is the effect of patient-driven digital psychological treatment, compared to standardized internet CBT, on frequency of completers and completed modules among adults with anxiety disorders?
Secondary research questions:
3. What is the effect of patient-driven digital psychological treatment, compared to standardized internet CBT, on the experience of empowerment, (measured by the "Empowerment Scale"), for adults with anxiety disorders?
4. What is the effect of patient-driven digital psychological treatment, compared to standardized internet CBT, on anxiety (measured with GAD-7), depression (measured with MADRS-S), general disability (measured with WHODAS 2.0) and steps in "valued direction" (measured with "Bull´s Eye compass") for adults with anxiety disorders?
Associations:
5. Is there a correlation between perceptions of how much one has been able to control the treatment (measured with a questionnaire developed by the researchers for this study), feelings of being able to cope with one's mental illness (measured with Patient Enablement Instrument), how satisfied participants are with their treatment (measured vid CSQ-8), perceptions of empowerment (measured with the "Empowerment Scale") and changes in anxiety symptoms (measured with GAD-7)?
6. Does perceptions of how much participants have been affected by the pandemic of Covid-19 in their daily life correlate with anxiety symptoms (measured with GAD-7) 3 months after termination of treatment?
Mediation:
7. What is the mediating effect of empowerment, measured by the "Empowerment Scale", on changes in anxiety symptoms (measured with GAD-7)?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient-driven iCBT
Participants who are randomized to the experimental condition are asked to make choices regarding the structure of their treatment program
Patient-driven iCBT
1\) Participants who are randomized to the experimental condition are asked to make choices regarding the structure of their treatment by the time of the randomization call. The participant can choose which of the available treatment programs (targeting anxiety, worry, stress, sleep disorders or depression) they want to undergo, how many modules in the treatment program they want to complete and in what order, for how many weeks they want to complete the treatment as well as how much telephone contact and how much written contact they want to have with their therapist.
Standardized iCBT (TAU)
Patients who are randomized to the control condition undergo the usual iCBT program available for anxiety disorders for a standardized time period of 8 weeks
Standardized iCBT (TAU)
2\) Patients who are randomized to the control condition (standardized iCBT) undergo the usual iCBT program available for anxiety disorders for 8 weeks. The psychologist provide weekly feedback on the patient's exercises and interact with the patient via secure encrypted messages in the treatment program. A follow-up telephone call takes place at the middle of treatment and at the end of the treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient-driven iCBT
1\) Participants who are randomized to the experimental condition are asked to make choices regarding the structure of their treatment by the time of the randomization call. The participant can choose which of the available treatment programs (targeting anxiety, worry, stress, sleep disorders or depression) they want to undergo, how many modules in the treatment program they want to complete and in what order, for how many weeks they want to complete the treatment as well as how much telephone contact and how much written contact they want to have with their therapist.
Standardized iCBT (TAU)
2\) Patients who are randomized to the control condition (standardized iCBT) undergo the usual iCBT program available for anxiety disorders for 8 weeks. The psychologist provide weekly feedback on the patient's exercises and interact with the patient via secure encrypted messages in the treatment program. A follow-up telephone call takes place at the middle of treatment and at the end of the treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Has access to a computer with internet connection
* Speak and understand Swedish
* Meets the diagnostic criteria for an anxiety disorder (social anxiety, GAD (Generalized Anxiety Disorder), panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder or unspecified anxiety disorder)
Exclusion Criteria
* has serious suicidal thoughts or suicidal plans
* has complex comorbidity or is in need of other care for mental illness in addition to iCBT
* is receiving other psychological treatment during the treatment period
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vastra Gotaland Region
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Linnea Nissling, Phd-student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Martin Kraepelien, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
Viktor Kaldo, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
Dominique Hange, Docent
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
General Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sweden
Anna Larsson, Psy M
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland,Sweden
Sandra Weineland, Docent
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nissling L, Kraepelien M, Kaldo V, Hange D, Larsson A, Persson M, Weineland S. Effects of patient-driven iCBT for anxiety in routine primary care and the relation between increased experience of empowerment and outcome: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2021 Sep 21;26:100456. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100456. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dnr: 2019-03786
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.