AZA+Lus VS AZA Monotherapy in HR-MDS

NCT ID: NCT06927232

Last Updated: 2025-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-30

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label cohort study involving untreated HR-MDS patients. The patients were divided randomized into AZA+Lus cohort and AZA monotherapy cohort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) have been shown to improve survival and delay disease progression in patients with high-risk MDS. They are recommended by the NCCN as first-line treatments for patients with high-risk MDS. Clinical trials have demonstrated an OR rate of approximately 40-50% with AZA in patients with high-risk MDS. Despite the efficacy of HMA therapy, the rate of transfusion independence remains low. Anemia remains the most prominent symptom in refractory patients, with very limited options for subsequent treatment. Prolonged anemia affects every organ function and seriously affects the prognosis of patients.

Luspatercept is currently approved for the treatment of patients with both erythropoiesis receptor agonist ( ESA) treatment failures in transfusion-dependent low-risk MDS-RS patients. In a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial, compared to a placebo group, luspatercept significantly improved transfusion dependence and improved hemoglobin and quality of life in refractory MDS-RS patients. A recent conference report suggested that there was no significant difference in efficacy between low-risk and high-risk patients treated with luspatercept and that the HI rate for high-risk patients treated with luspatercept monotherapy was approximately 50%.

Thus this study aimed to compare the efficacy of AZA+luspatercept and AZA monotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azacitidine+Luspatercept

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azacitidine (AZA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day \*5 days, 28 days for 1 course

Luspatercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks, adjusted according to hemoglobin, up to 1.75mg/kg. If hemoglobin ≥120g/L, luspatercept can be discontinued.

Azacitidine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Azacitidine (AZA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day \*5 days, 28 days for 1 course

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azacitidine (AZA)

Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day \*5 days, 28 days for 1 course

Intervention Type DRUG

Luspatercept

Luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks, adjusted according to hemoglobin, up to 1.75mg/kg. If hemoglobin ≥120g/L, luspatercept can be discontinued.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years old
* Diagnosed as higher-risk MDS (IPSS intermediate-2/high-risk, or IPSS-R \>3.5, or IPSS-M moderate high-, high-, very high-risk)
* Untreated patients
* Liver and kidney function less than 2 times of upper limit of normal
* ECOG≤2 and expected survival more than 6 months
* Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

* With active infection
* Other malignant tumors
* Obvious abnormal liver and kidney function, or abnormal function of other organs
* Combined with myelofibrosis
* Have undergone bone marrow transplantation
* Pregnant or lactating women, or men who have recent reproductive needs
* Allergic to azacytidine, Rotercept or excipients
* History of polysorbate 80 allergy
* Refuse to sign informed consent
* Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in the experiment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bing Han

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AZA-Lus-HRMDS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AZD6738 for Patients With Progressive MDS or CMML
NCT03770429 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1