Evaluation of Azacitidine in Transfusion Dependent Patients With Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

NCT ID: NCT01048034

Last Updated: 2013-10-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Azacitidine has proved prolonged overall survival in patients with high-risk MDS. Minor pilot studies have shown that treatment with Azacitidine can induce transfusion independency in previous transfusion dependent patients with low-risk MDS. This study will evaluate the effect of Azacitidine in transfusion dependent patients with low-risk MDS (IPSS low or int-1) or low risk CMML. Included patients should first have failed, or considered not being eligible to, treatment with EPO +/- G-CSF. Our hypothesis is that Azacitidine can lead to transfusion independency in this group of patients. Those patients who do not respond to treatment with Azacitidine alone, will be given treatment with the combination of Azacitidine and EPO where our hypothesis is that Azacitidine can restore sensitivity to EPO.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myelodysplastic Syndrome Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Myelodysplastic syndrome Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Transfusion therapy Transfusion dependency Hypomethylating therapy Azacitidine DNA-methylation Epigenetic modifications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azacitidine +/- erythropoetin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azacitidine

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg / m(2) subcutaneously day 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Another three cycles will be given together with epo for those not responding to the first 6 cycles of Azacitidine

Erythropoetin

Intervention Type DRUG

For those patients not responding to Azacitidine alone, the combination of Azacitidine and erythropoetin 60 000 U / week for 16 weeks will be given.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azacitidine

100 mg / m(2) subcutaneously day 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Another three cycles will be given together with epo for those not responding to the first 6 cycles of Azacitidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Erythropoetin

For those patients not responding to Azacitidine alone, the combination of Azacitidine and erythropoetin 60 000 U / week for 16 weeks will be given.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form
* MDS at IPSS Low or Int-1, or mixed MDS/MPD; either CMML with \< 10% marrow blasts or RARS-T
* Patients with high or intermediate probability for response according to the predictive model (see Hellstrom-Lindberg et al, Br J Haematol 99:344-51 1997)should be refractory to EPO / darbepoetin (equivalent to \> 60 000 U of EPO / week for \> 8 weeks) followed by EPO + G-CSF for \> 8 weeks, or biosimilar drugs in equipotent doses, or EPO + G-CSF upfront for 8 weeks. Patients with low probability for response according to the predictive model, could be included without prior EPO/G-CSF treatment
* Transfusion need \>4 units over the last 8 weeks, or \>8 units over the last 26 weeks.
* Subject has signed the informed consent document.
* Men and women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception during, and for up to 3 months after treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or lactating females.
* Patients who are eligible for curative treatment
* Expected survival less than 24 weeks.
* Symptomatic thrombocytopenia / active bleeding
* Patients with JAK-2 positive RARS-T if eligible for new investigational drugs
* Serum biochemical values as follows

1. Serum creatinine \>2.0 mg/dL (177 micromol/L)
2. Serum aminotransferase (AST)/serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) or alanine transaminase (ALT)/serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) \>3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
3. Serum total bilirubin \>1.5 mg/dL (26 micromol/L)
* Uncontrolled systemic infection
* Considered not capable of following the study protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nordic MDS Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Magnus Tobiasson, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Nordic MDS Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Aarhus Univsersity Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet Univsersity Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Herlev Hospital

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Department of Medcine, Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Department of Medicine, Mälarsjukhuset Hospital

Eskilstuna, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of medicine, Falun Hospital

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital / Östra

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Linköping University Hospital

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Medicine, Sunderbyn Hospital

Luleå, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Lund University Hospital

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Medicine, Södersjukhuset Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Medicine, Umeå University Hospital

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Department of Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Norway Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-011483-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NMDSG08A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id