Shockwave in Postoperative Breast Reconstruction Fibrosis
NCT ID: NCT06919042
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Complex Decongestive Therapy Results in Patients With Lipedema
NCT06898125
Comparing Two Protocols of Shock Wave Therapy for Patients With Plantar Fasciitis
NCT06174142
The Clinical Utility of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Burns
NCT04340271
Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Trapezius Muscle Stiffness
NCT06934668
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, LASER Therapy and Cryotherapy in Patients Having Sacroiliitis
NCT06569615
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Eligible patients included adult females with clinically diagnosed postoperative fibrosis after breast reconstruction. Patients with prior radiation exposure or capsular contracture were included and stratified by indication into three categories: post-breast reconstruction fibrosis without radiation, (1) post-breast reconstruction fibrosis following radiation, and (2) post-breast reconstruction fibrosis with capsular contracture. Demographic data including age and race/ethnicity were collected. Patients with active infection, systemic illness, or pregnancy were excluded.
The shockwave therapy group received eight sessions of Pulsed Acoustic Cellular Expression (PACE) therapy delivered twice weekly for four weeks at level E2. Therapy parameters (e.g. number of pulses) were adjusted based on the anatomical location and severity of fibrosis, in accordance with manufacturer guidelines. The control group underwent the same schedule and treatment setup using the same equipment, but with the shockwave component disabled to serve as a placebo.
Outcome measures were assessed at each session (1-8) and at 3 months. Patient-reported outcomes included perceived change in fibrosis size (rated 1-10, with 10 being the greatest reduction), softness/pliability (10 being softest), pain (10 indicating worst pain), and shoulder mobility (10 indicating greatest mobility). Observer-based clinical outcomes included assessments of size (10 = largest), contour (10 = worst), firmness (10 = hardest), shoulder mobility (10=full mobility) and overall impression (10 = worst quality). In addition, scar area was measured objectively in square millimeters using caliper measurements. Video recordings of the treated areas were collected at visit to qualitatively assess visual changes over time. In addition to clinical and patient-reported outcomes, point-of-care handheld ultrasound (POCUS) was used to qualitatively assess tissue characteristics at baseline and at session 8 follow-up. Ultrasound evaluations were performed using a standardized protocol by a trained study team member. Recordings were analyzed qualitatively using a 5-point Likert scale across five domains: (1) fibrosis size, (2) echogenicity, (3) homogeneity, and (4) boundary definition. Higher scores indicated more favorable healing outcomes. Comparisons between treatment and placebo groups were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test due to the ordinal nature of the scoring system.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
The control arm receives eight sessions of a sham (placebo) version of the therapy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
The intervention arm receives eight sessions of Pulsed Acoustic Cellular Expression (PACE) therapy delivered twice weekly for four weeks at level E2
Pulsed Acoustic Cellular Expression therapy
The therapy involves the delivery of targeted acoustic energy that initiates cellular mechanotransduction pathways, inducing beneficial biological responses such as enhanced angiogenesis, modulation of fibroblast proliferation and differentiation, and reorganization of aberrant extracellular matrix components.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pulsed Acoustic Cellular Expression therapy
The therapy involves the delivery of targeted acoustic energy that initiates cellular mechanotransduction pathways, inducing beneficial biological responses such as enhanced angiogenesis, modulation of fibroblast proliferation and differentiation, and reorganization of aberrant extracellular matrix components.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have undergone plastic surgery procedures and present in the post-operative period with soft tissue firmness suggestive of subcutaneous/parenchymal fibrosis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Other medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with study participation, may complicate subject compliance, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the Investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
* Proximity of fibrotic tissue directly adjacent to bone
* Face/neck areas are excluded
* Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, would not be compliant with the schedule of study visits
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert Galiano
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lavin Pavilion Suite 2060
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nguyen AT, Chon J, Li RA, Melnick BA, Abu-Romman A, Laiwalla R, Adam TH, Galiano RD. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy improves post-breast reconstruction fibrosis: A randomized controlled blinded clinical trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Sep 9;110:7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.08.045. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00221726
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.