Shock Wave Therapy Versus Mechanical Traction on Mechanical Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT05088031
Last Updated: 2021-10-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-11-01
2022-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The practice of sitting with a healthy posture and preventing a protracted-standing position can often prevent simple low back pain. However, many kinds of low back pain are addressed with therapies as numerous as the causes of low back pain. The most important treatments are therapeutic measures, such as bed rest, assistive aids, traction therapy, heat, electrical stimulation, and manual therapy are the first choice treatments4. If these methods fails, invasive therapy procedures like nerve roots blocks and epidural injections are employed, and operations are carried out when no reaction to other treatments has been seen or if the disease status is critical. New conservative therapies, including extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), have recently been embraced 5.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1- Group ( A): 20 patients underwent shock wave therapy
1-Group (A): 20 patients would undergo shock waves plus traditional physical therapy. One thousand shock waves (7 times per sec) were applied at 2.5 Hz at low energy flux densities of 0.01-0.16 mJ/mm2 using a 17 mm head for 15 minutes on alternate days for four weeks for a total of 12 sessions14.
shock waves therapy
Group (A): 20 patients would undergo shock waves plus traditional physical therapy. One thousand shock waves (7 times per sec) were applied at 2.5 Hz at low energy flux densities of 0.01-0.16 mJ/mm2 using a 17 mm head 2-Group (B): 20 patients would undergo intermittent mechanical traction plus conventional physical therapy. Participants would undergo 30 minutes of "mechanical traction (with 10-second pull and 5-second rest)"
2-Group (B): 20 patients would undergo intermittent mechanical traction
2-Group (B): 20 patients would undergo intermittent mechanical traction plus conventional physical therapy. Participants would undergo 30 minutes of "mechanical traction (with 10-second pull and 5-second rest)" 3 times weekly day after day for four weeks for a total of 12 sessions.
shock waves therapy
Group (A): 20 patients would undergo shock waves plus traditional physical therapy. One thousand shock waves (7 times per sec) were applied at 2.5 Hz at low energy flux densities of 0.01-0.16 mJ/mm2 using a 17 mm head 2-Group (B): 20 patients would undergo intermittent mechanical traction plus conventional physical therapy. Participants would undergo 30 minutes of "mechanical traction (with 10-second pull and 5-second rest)"
Group (C): (Control group) 20 patients would underwent conventional physical therapy
3-Group (C): (Control group) 20 patients would underwent conventional physical therapy consisted of "hyperthermia using hot packs (20 minutes), ultrasound (5 minutes), and electrotherapy using TENS (15 minutes) in addition to stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes".
shock waves therapy
Group (A): 20 patients would undergo shock waves plus traditional physical therapy. One thousand shock waves (7 times per sec) were applied at 2.5 Hz at low energy flux densities of 0.01-0.16 mJ/mm2 using a 17 mm head 2-Group (B): 20 patients would undergo intermittent mechanical traction plus conventional physical therapy. Participants would undergo 30 minutes of "mechanical traction (with 10-second pull and 5-second rest)"
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
shock waves therapy
Group (A): 20 patients would undergo shock waves plus traditional physical therapy. One thousand shock waves (7 times per sec) were applied at 2.5 Hz at low energy flux densities of 0.01-0.16 mJ/mm2 using a 17 mm head 2-Group (B): 20 patients would undergo intermittent mechanical traction plus conventional physical therapy. Participants would undergo 30 minutes of "mechanical traction (with 10-second pull and 5-second rest)"
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* all subjects suffered from mechanical low back pain
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merit University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Assem
Lecturer of Physical Therapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ahmed Abd El Rahim
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
Chung TS, Yang HE, Ahn SJ, Park JH. Herniated Lumbar Disks: Real-time MR Imaging Evaluation during Continuous Traction. Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):755-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141400. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
Lee S, Lee D, Park J. Effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on patients with chronic low back pain and their dynamic balance ability. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jan;26(1):7-10. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.7. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
Han H, Lee D, Lee S, Jeon C, Kim T. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain, disability, and depression of chronic low back pain patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):397-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.397. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Mechanical LBP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id