The Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Coccydynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT02313324

Last Updated: 2014-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on the outcomes of coccydynia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coccydynia is pain in the coccygeal region, and usually treated conservatively. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) was incorporated as non-invasive treatment of many musculoskeletal conditions. However, the effects of ESWT on coccydynia are less discussed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of ESWT on the outcomes of coccydynia. Patients were allocated to ESWT (n=20) or physical modality (SIT) group (n=21) randomly, and received total treatment duration of 4 weeks. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and self-reported satisfaction score were used to assess treatment effects. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly decreased after treatment in both groups, and the decrease in the VAS score was significantly greater in the ESWT group. The mean proportional changes in the ODI scores were greater in the ESWT group than in the SIT group, but the between-group difference was not statistically significant. The patients in the ESWT group had significantly higher subjective satisfaction scores than SIT group. The investigators concluded that ESWT is more effective and satisfactory in improving discomfort and disability caused by coccydynia than the use of physical modalities. Thus, ESWT is recommended as an optimal treatment option for patients with coccydynia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coccydynia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Coccydynia Extracorporeal shock wave therapy Disability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESWT group

The patients were randomly assigned to the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The patients received 2000 shots of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the coccyx area per session for four sessions (one session a week for 4 consecutive weeks). The frequency used was 5 Hz and the pressure was 3-4 bar.

SWD combined IFC group

The patients were randomly assigned to the SIT group. The patients received combined therapy with shortwave diathermy (SWD) and interferential current (IFC) performed by the same physiotherapist at each treatment session.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SWD combined IFC

Intervention Type DEVICE

The shortwave diathermy (SWD) was the inductive mode with a coil at a frequency of approximately 27.12 MHz. The shortwave diathermy applicator was placed over the sacrococcygeal area. The treatment duration was 20 minutes. After completing the SWD treatments, the patients received the interferential current (IFC) treatment. IFC provides deeper electrical stimulation. The electrical current was applied to the gluteal area using four electrodes from 2 channels of the stimulator. The four electrodes were set on the gluteal area. The carrier frequency, typically 4000 Hz and 4100 Hz and designed to interfere with each other, resulted in a beat frequency of 100 Hz within the treated area. The treatment duration was 20 minutes. The protocol was set as 3 times per week for a period of 4 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)

The patients received 2000 shots of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the coccyx area per session for four sessions (one session a week for 4 consecutive weeks). The frequency used was 5 Hz and the pressure was 3-4 bar.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SWD combined IFC

The shortwave diathermy (SWD) was the inductive mode with a coil at a frequency of approximately 27.12 MHz. The shortwave diathermy applicator was placed over the sacrococcygeal area. The treatment duration was 20 minutes. After completing the SWD treatments, the patients received the interferential current (IFC) treatment. IFC provides deeper electrical stimulation. The electrical current was applied to the gluteal area using four electrodes from 2 channels of the stimulator. The four electrodes were set on the gluteal area. The carrier frequency, typically 4000 Hz and 4100 Hz and designed to interfere with each other, resulted in a beat frequency of 100 Hz within the treated area. The treatment duration was 20 minutes. The protocol was set as 3 times per week for a period of 4 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First-time diagnosed with coccydynia
* History of direct traumatic events to the buttocks, such as falls or slipping

Exclusion Criteria

* Tumors of the cauda equina
* Pelvic surgery
* Herniation of the lumbosacral disc
* Internal procidentia
* Genitourinary or gastrointestinal complaints
* Psychogenic factors
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

83 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chia-Hsin Chen, MD.PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lin SF, Chen YJ, Tu HP, Lee CL, Hsieh CL, Wu WL, Chen CH. The Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients with Coccydynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142475. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26556601 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

kmutth-101-023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id