Factors Affecting Response to Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Plantar Fasciitis: A Cross-sectional Clinical Study
NCT ID: NCT07006389
Last Updated: 2025-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
128 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-01-01
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dextrose Prolotherapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in Plantar Fasciitis
NCT07233395
Is ESWT Better in Plantar Fasciitis Treatment?
NCT05647291
Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Which is More Effective? Prolotherapy/Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy?
NCT06712329
"Comparison of Shockwave Application on the Sole of the Foot Vs. the Back of the Leg in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: a Clinical Trial."
NCT06589037
Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Gait Parameters in Patients With Planter Fascitis
NCT06310122
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-responder group to ESWT
Patients who had less than 50% response in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after ESWT and patients who had \>50% VAS regression in the first month after ESWT and whose pain recurred afterwards
No interventions assigned to this group
Responder group to ESWT
Patients who had \>50% VAS regression in the 6th month were included in the group that responded to ESWT treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Unresponsive to conservative treatments (physical therapy, rest, exercises, anti-inflammatory medical treatment, insoles, etc.)
* Patients who have received ESWT treatment and 3-6 months have passed since ESWT
Exclusion Criteria
* Those taking NSAIDs in the last 2 weeks
* Those with a history of trauma or surgery to the foot or ankle
* Presence of rheumatic disease affecting the foot or ankle (e.g. spondyloarthritis, etc.)
* Malignancy
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Selda Çiftci
Medical Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Banu Kuran, Professor, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Taining and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12.31.2024/approval no:4684
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.