Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dextrose Prolotherapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in Plantar Fasciitis

NCT ID: NCT07233395

Last Updated: 2025-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-15

Study Completion Date

2026-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Plantar fasciitis is a degeneration of the plantar aponeurosis and is the most common cause of heel pain (11-15%). Although seen in both sexes, plantar fasciitis is more common in women, usually unilateral and bilateral in 30% of cases . The most widely accepted view regarding the formation of plantar fasciitis is that it is a degenerative process caused by myxoid degeneration, microtears, collagen necrosis, and angiofibroblastic hyperplasia, resulting from repetitive microtrauma to the plantar fascia, particularly at the calcaneal insertion site. It is not inflammatory . The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prolotherapy, a regenerative treatment, and ESWT in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Plantar fasciitis is known as the most common cause of heel pain in adults. While its incidence increases between the ages of 40 and 60, it is more common in runners, those who work in positions requiring prolonged standing, overweight individuals, and those with certain biomechanical foot problems. Diagnosis of plantar fasciitis can be easily made through history and physical examination. Conservative methods are the first line of treatment. Local injections and ESWT are used in patients who fail to improve despite conservative treatment. ESWT and Prolotherapy are treatment methods that induce regeneration by creating a controlled inflammation. This prospective study aims to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and Prolotherapy, which have similar mechanisms of action, in the treatment of plantar fasciitis and to identify the more effective method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Plantar Fasciitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups. One group will receive dextrose prolotherapy and the other will receive extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT).

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of these two regenerative treatment methods in patients with plantar fasciitis.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcome assessor will be blinded to treatment allocation. Participants and care providers will be aware of the intervention due to the nature of the treatments.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dextrose Prolotherapy

Participants in this group will receive dextrose prolotherapy twice, at two-week intervals.

A 5 mL syringe will be prepared with 2.5 mL of 30% dextrose, 2 mL of isotonic saline, and 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine (final 15% dextrose solution).

Injections will be administered into seven points around the plantar fascia origin and insertion under aseptic conditions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dextrose Prolotherapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants in this group will receive dextrose prolotherapy twice, at two-week intervals.

A 5 mL syringe containing 2.5 mL of 30% dextrose, 2 mL isotonic saline, and 0.5 mL 2% lidocaine (final 15% dextrose solution) will be injected into seven points around the plantar fascia origin under aseptic conditions.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

Participants in this group will receive extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) twice per week for a total of four sessions.

The treatment will be applied to the plantar fascia insertion using a standard clinical ESWT device following manufacturer guidelines.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants in this group will receive extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) twice per week for a total of four sessions.

The treatment will be applied to the plantar fascia insertion area using a standard clinical shock wave therapy device.

Energy level, frequency, and pulse count will be set according to manufacturer recommendations and standard clinical protocols.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dextrose Prolotherapy

Participants in this group will receive dextrose prolotherapy twice, at two-week intervals.

A 5 mL syringe containing 2.5 mL of 30% dextrose, 2 mL isotonic saline, and 0.5 mL 2% lidocaine (final 15% dextrose solution) will be injected into seven points around the plantar fascia origin under aseptic conditions.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

Participants in this group will receive extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) twice per week for a total of four sessions.

The treatment will be applied to the plantar fascia insertion area using a standard clinical shock wave therapy device.

Energy level, frequency, and pulse count will be set according to manufacturer recommendations and standard clinical protocols.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prolotherapy Injection Shock Wave Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of plantar fasciitis

Ages 18 to 75 years

Both male and female participants

Heel pain localized to the medial calcaneal tubercle for more than 3 months

Morning first-step pain and pain increasing with daily loading

Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent

Patients presenting to Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital

Exclusion Criteria

Cardiac pacemaker

Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus

History of inflammatory rheumatic disease

Bleeding disorders

Use of anticoagulant medications other than aspirin

Allergy to dextrose

Previous foot or ankle surgery

Peripheral neuropathy

S1 radiculopathy in the same extremity

Local corticosteroid injection to the plantar fascia within the last 3 months

ESWT applied to the plantar fascia within the last 3 months

Physical therapy applied to the foot/ankle in the last 3 months

Cognitive dysfunction

Active infection at the planned injection site

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zeynep Karakuzu Güngör

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ZEYNEP KARAKUZU GÜNGÖR, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ZEYNEP KARAKUZU GÜNGÖR

Role: CONTACT

+905077750375

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KanuniSSTRH-PF-2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.