ASPIRE I: Supporting Antibiotic Stewardship in Primary Care Via POCT
NCT ID: NCT06912022
Last Updated: 2025-04-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
36 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-09-12
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The POC assay results will be compared to the participants clinical outcomes and the physician directed treatment pathway via reviewing medical records and by contacting the patient from 14 days after their visit.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ASPIRE II. Supporting Antibiotic Stewardship in Primary Care Via POCT
NCT06981130
Point of Care Testing Using FebriDx in Primary Care: a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
NCT05534555
Evaluation of a Single Use Point of Care Device for the Diagnosis of Respiratory Pathogens
NCT04431050
Point of Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing for Antibiotic Stewardship in Primary Care
NCT06765135
Performance Evaluation of LumiraDx COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Ag Test
NCT04557046
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The economic costs of antibiotic resistance are largely unknown, but it is anticipated that with an increased number of cases, effects to the economy could be severe. Infections and infectious diseases cost England \& Wales an estimated £30 billion a year, with many cases of acute respiratory infections (Chaplin, 2017). POC diagnostic tests in a clinical setting could give clinicians the ability to distinguish between microbial and viral infections, providing a more informed decision to antibiotic prescribing.
The purpose of this study is to safely distinguish between bacterial or viral respiratory infections in a primary care setting using "point of care" (POC) testing to provide a retrospective insight as to whether clinical assessment of an acute respiratory infection (ARI) is justified. Upon clinical assessment, the current clinical practice prescribes antibiotics based on symptoms reported by the patient and a subjective review by the GP. This results in antibiotics being prescribed from an informed decision made by the clinician, based only from patient symptoms. The use of a dual marker immunoassay could guide informed decisions based on qualitative data and degree of infection using POC testing in Primary Care.
The POC assay uses a dual marker immunoassay to differentiate between a viral and bacterial infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) is raised in the blood stream in response to inflammation. CRP can be elevated in viral infections, but generally the rise is to higher levels in bacterial infections, especially severe bacterial infections. Another blood protein, the MxA protein, is selectively increased in people with viral infections and therefore has the potential to greatly enhance the rapid distinction between viral and bacterial respiratory infections.
NICE guidance from 2014 recommends the use of CRP POC test in the diagnosis and appropriate management of lower respiratory tract infections in adults aged 18 and over (excluding people with COPD) after clinical assessment whether antibiotics should be prescribed. The study POC assay data could be used as an effective tool alongside NICE guidelines to prescribe antibiotics based on CRP concentration where an infection may be viral. Recent clinical studies suggest the POC test is highly effective, yielding over 80% sensitivity and over 90% specificity when identifying bacterial and viral infections in adults (NICE, 2020).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Suspected ARI patients
Patient presenting with acute respiratory infections tested using the FebriDx POC assay.
FebriDx Device
Patients suspected of an acute respiratory infection were tested using the FebriDx POC assay.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FebriDx Device
Patients suspected of an acute respiratory infection were tested using the FebriDx POC assay.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having new onset symptoms suggestive of acute respiratory infection (ARI within 7 days of seeking care: runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, hoarse voice, softness of breath) with or without fever.
Exclusion Criteria
* Undergoing end of life care.
* Immunocompromised or taking chemotherapy, oral steroids, or interferon.
* Receiving a live vaccine in the last 14 days.
* Taking antibiotics or antivirals in the last 14 days.
* Patients that are systematically unwell or having symptoms that lasted more than 7 days\*.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cwm Taf University Health Board (NHS)
OTHER_GOV
University of South Wales
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prof Mark Williams, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Chief Investigator University of South Wales
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Keir Hardie Practice 3
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Ysbyty Cwm Rhondda
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
306081
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.