ASPIRE II. Supporting Antibiotic Stewardship in Primary Care Via POCT

NCT ID: NCT06981130

Last Updated: 2025-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) are a major contributor to antibiotic resistance, largely due to the over prescription of antibiotics driven by the subjective nature of clinical assessment. The ASPIRE II study aims to evaluate whether a Point-of-Care (POC) diagnostic test, utilising C-reactive protein (CRP) and Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) biomarkers to differentiate between viral and bacterial infections can support clinical decision-making and serve as an effective antimicrobial stewardship tool.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the first ASPIRE study, in which the POC test was taken after the consultation, 20 participants produced results in the ratio 10:7:3 (negative, bacterial, viral) with a 75% agreement to the antibiotic prescription given by the physician following face-to-face consultation. The observational ASPIRE I Study identified the need for a rapid POC test and highlighted areas in which the test could have been used to prevent over-prescribing of antibiotics when ARI's are identified as viral. The FebriDx POC test was also useful in identifying instances where antibiotics were not prescribed, when a bacterial infection is presented, proving an effective decision-making tool for antibiotic stewardship.

Antibiotic stewardship is fast becoming an essential measure to improve antibiotic prescribing by clinicians. Antibiotic stewardship not only presents a cost-effective strategy for the NHS but addressed the issue of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and protects patients from harm caused by unnecessary antibiotic use.

The economic costs of antibiotic resistance are largely unknown, but it is anticipated that with an increased number of cases, effects to the economy could be severe. Infections and infectious diseases cost England \& Wales an estimated £30 billion a year, with many cases of acute respiratory infections (Chaplin, 2017). POC diagnostic tests in a clinical setting could give clinicians the ability to distinguish between microbial and viral infections, providing a more informed decision to antibiotic prescribing.

The purpose of this study is to build upon data generated by the ASPIRE study that determined by retrospective evaluation, that a POC immunoassay can accurately be used to guide clinician's prescription decision. The ASPIRE 2 study will use the POC assay as an interventional decision tool prior to the GP's consultation of a suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI).

Upon clinical assessment, the current clinical practice prescribes antibiotics based on symptoms reported by the patient and a subjective review by the GP. This results in antibiotics being prescribed from an informed decision made by the clinician, based only from patient symptoms. The use of a dual marker immunoassay could guide informed decisions based on qualitative data and degree of infection using POC testing in Primary Care.

The POC assay uses a dual marker immunoassay to differentiate between a viral and bacterial infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) is raised in the blood stream in response to inflammation. CRP can be elevated in viral infections, but generally the rise is to higher levels in bacterial infections, especially severe bacterial infections. Another blood protein, the MxA protein, is selectively increased in people with viral infections and therefore has the potential to greatly enhance the rapid distinction between viral and bacterial respiratory infections.

NICE guidance from 2014 recommends the use of CRP POC test in the diagnosis and appropriate management of lower respiratory tract infections in adults aged 18 and over (excluding people with COPD) after clinical assessment whether antibiotics should be prescribed. The study POC assay data could be used as an effective tool alongside NICE guidelines to prescribe antibiotics based on CRP concentration where an infection may be viral. Recent clinical studies suggest the POC test is highly effective, yielding over 80% sensitivity and over 90% specificity when identifying bacterial and viral infections in adults (NICE, 2020).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This study follows a single-group assignment model in which all participants presenting to general practice with symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) undergo testing with a Point-of-Care (PoC) diagnostic device. The device measures C-reactive protein (CRP) and Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) to help differentiate between viral and bacterial infections. The intervention is applied uniformly, and outcomes such as test performance, diagnostic accuracy, clinician decision-making, and antibiotic prescribing behaviour are monitored prospectively. No randomisation or control arm is included, as the primary objective is to evaluate real-world clinical utility and diagnostic performance in a standard care setting.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients Suspected with Acute Respiratory Infection

Self-referred patients presenting ARI symptoms that have met the study inclusion criteria and have been recruited to the study.

Group Type OTHER

FebriDx Point of Care Test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients self-referring to their GP practice with symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) will receive the FebriDx point-of-care test during their clinical consultation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FebriDx Point of Care Test

Patients self-referring to their GP practice with symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) will receive the FebriDx point-of-care test during their clinical consultation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject \>18 years of age.
* having new onset symptoms suggestive of acute respiratory infection (ARI within 7 days of seeking care: runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, hoarse voice, shortness of breath) with or without fever.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent.
* Undergoing end of life care.
* Immunocompromised or taking chemotherapy, oral steroids, or interferon.
* Receiving a live vaccine in the last 14 days.
* Taking antibiotics or antivirals in the last 14 days.
* Patients that have symptoms lasting more than 7 days.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cwm Taf University Health Board (NHS)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of South Wales

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kier Hardie Practice 3

Merthyr Tydfil, Rhondda Cynon Taff, United Kingdom

Site Status

Oaktree Surgery

Bridgend, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Meddygfa Glan Cynon Surgery

Mountain Ash, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

322984

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.