Investigation Of The Effects Of Unilateral And Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia On Cerebral Blood Flow

NCT ID: NCT06871449

Last Updated: 2025-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-27

Study Completion Date

2023-03-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal anesthesia is a widely used method in anesthesia practice. Unilateral spinal block refers to a neuroaxial technique that induces motor and sensory blockade on the surgical side. While spinal anesthesia offers numerous advantages, it is associated with complications such as hypotension, headache, transient neurological symptoms, and meningitis. Among these, hypotension is the most common. To mitigate hemodynamic issues, intravenous fluid preloading and vasopressor use are standard practices in many centers.

This study aimed to compare regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO₂) values in patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral spinal blocks to identify the least complicated and most effective method. Minimizing complications can facilitate early mobilization, reduce hospital stays, and lower infection risks.

The study included 60 male patients (aged 18-65 years) scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia surgery at Kayseri City Hospital. Inclusion criteria were the absence of coagulation disorders, infections, or systemic diseases, hemoglobin levels \>10 g/dL, and BMI \<30. Patients were randomized into two groups:

Group I: Unilateral spinal anesthesia with 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. Patients were placed in a lateral position on the surgical side for 5 minutes, then moved to the supine position.

Group II: Bilateral spinal anesthesia with 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. Patients were placed in the supine position for 5 minutes.

Sensory block levels were assessed using the pin-prick test, and motor blocks were evaluated with the Bromage scale. Surgery commenced when the sensory block reached the T10 level. Patient data, including age, BMI, hemoglobin, baseline systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and rSO₂, were recorded before and after spinal anesthesia. SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, SpO₂, and rSO₂ values were monitored at 5-minute intervals for 30 minutes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was conducted with the approval of the Kayseri City Hospital Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (approval number: 2022/605). Written informed patient consent was obtained (A Guide to Good Clinical Practice, 609, Mehtap Balcı, 24.03.2022). This manuscript adheres to the applicable TITCK - Turkish Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Authority guideline. It was determined that meaningful results could be obtained with a minimum of eight patients by performing a power analysis.

A total of 60 male volunteer patients, aged 18-65 years, scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia surgery in the Kayseri City Hospital operating room, were included. The inclusion criteria were the absence of coagulation disorders or prolonged bleeding times, no infections at the injection site or systemic infections, ability to cooperate, no history of opioid use or local anesthetic allergy, no cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic diseases, hemoglobin levels \>10 g/dL, and BMI \<30. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 each.

Before surgery, patients were informed about the procedure and the anesthesia method. After reading and signing the informed consent form, volunteer patients were brought to the operating table. Intravenous access was established for all patients, and non-invasive monitoring was initiated. Patients were placed in a seated position, and the intervention area was cleaned with 10% povidone-iodine. Under sterile conditions, a 22G (Quincke) spinal needle was slowly advanced into the L4-5 spinal interspace, and free, clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow was observed.

Group I: Spinal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc, Buvasin 0.5% Spinal Heavy), followed by placing the patient in a lateral position on the surgical side for 5 minutes and then switching to the supine position.

Group II: Spinal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc, Buvasin 0.5% Spinal Heavy), followed by placing the patient in the supine position for 5 minutes.

The sensory block level was assessed using the pin-prick test, and the motor block level was evaluated using the Bromage scale. Surgery commenced once the sensory block reached the T10 level. Throughout the surgery, all patients received 3 L/min of 100% oxygen via a face mask.

Groups:

Group I: Intrathecal 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc), lateral position for 5 minutes.

Group II: Intrathecal 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc), supine position for 5 minutes.

Data regarding the patients' demographic characteristics (age, height, weight, BMI), baseline hemoglobin (Hb), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO₂) were recorded before and after spinal anesthesia. SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, SpO₂, and rSO₂ values were recorded at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia. The data obtained will be analyzed using SPSS 25. If the parametric assumptions (Shapiro-Wilk test) are met, a t-test will be applied to determine the significance of the difference between independent groups, and variance analysis (ANOVA) will be applied for repeated measurements within groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adverse Effect Cerebral Perfusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

unilateral Spinal Block(GroupI)

Group I: After appropriate area cleaning, under sterile conditions, the spinal space was accessed through the L4-L5 interspace, and 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc, Buvasin 0.5% Spinal Heavy) was administered following the observation of free, clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow. The patient was then kept in the lateral position on the surgical side for 5 minutes before being moved to the supine position.

No interventions assigned to this group

Bilateral Spinal Block (Group II)

Group II: After appropriate area cleaning, under sterile conditions, the spinal space was accessed through the L4-L5 interspace, and 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc, Buvasin 0.5% Spinal Heavy) was administered following the observation of free, clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow. The patient was then kept in the supine position for 5 minutes.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* No coagulation disorders or prolonged bleeding times
* No infections at the injection site or systemic infections
* Ability to cooperate
* No history of opioid use or local anesthetic allergy
* No cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic diseases
* Hemoglobin levels \>10 g/dL
* BMI \<30

Exclusion Criteria

* Coagulation disorders present
* Infections at the injection site or systemic infections
* Inability to cooperate
* History of opioid use or local anesthetic allergy
* Cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic diseases present
* Hemoglobin levels \<10 g/dL
* BMI \>30
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kayseri City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nuh Naci Yazgan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MEHTAP BALCI

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nuh Naci Yazgan Üniversity Faculty of Dentistry

Kayseri, Kocasinan, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kusku A, Demir G, Cukurova Z, Eren G, Hergunsel O. Monitorization of the effects of spinal anaesthesia on cerebral oxygen saturation in elder patients using near-infrared spectroscopy. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24998107 (View on PubMed)

Nishikawa K, Hagiwara R, Nakamura K, Ishizeki J, Kubo K, Saito S, Goto F. The effects of the extent of spinal block on the BIS score and regional cerebral oxygen saturation in elderly patients: A prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007 Apr;21(2):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s10877-006-9063-7. Epub 2007 Jan 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17216322 (View on PubMed)

Minville V, Asehnoune K, Salau S, Bourdet B, Tissot B, Lubrano V, Fourcade O. The effects of spinal anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in the very elderly. Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1291-4. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819b073b.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19299802 (View on PubMed)

Hoppenstein D, Zohar E, Ramaty E, Shabat S, Fredman B. The effects of general vs spinal anesthesia on frontal cerebral oxygen saturation in geriatric patients undergoing emergency surgical fixation of the neck of femur. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Sep;17(6):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.09.013.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16171663 (View on PubMed)

Hino A, Ueda S, Mizukawa N, Imahori Y, Tenjin H. Effect of hemodilution on cerebral hemodynamics and oxygen metabolism. Stroke. 1992 Mar;23(3):423-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.3.423.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1542907 (View on PubMed)

Sun S, Liu NH, Huang SQ. Role of cerebral oxygenation for prediction of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for caesarean section. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):417-21. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9733-4. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26186992 (View on PubMed)

Aydin G, Sayan CD. Is body mass index a risk factor for low cerebral oxygenation during spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section? A preliminary study. Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Jun 18;49(3):854-861. doi: 10.3906/sag-1810-208.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31190520 (View on PubMed)

Hirose N, Kondo Y, Maeda T, Suzuki T, Yoshino A. Relationship between regional cerebral blood volume and oxygenation and blood pressure during spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section. J Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):603-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2165-6. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27011334 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Mehtap Balcı

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.