tDCS for Catatonic Depression in Down Syndrome: A Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT06866925

Last Updated: 2025-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-12

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for depression with catatonia in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). 62 patients will be randomized to receive 15 sessions of active or sham tDCS. The primary objective is to measure changes in depressive/catatonic symptoms using the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). Secondary objectives include safety, cognitive effects, EEG correlates, and biological markers (cortisol, BDNF, cytokines). The study aims to provide a non-pharmacological therapeutic alternative for this population

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Justification: Depression is common in individuals with Down syndrome (DS), often accompanied by catatonia, and is under-treated. Conventional treatments are limited by tolerability and linguistic difficulties. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), safe and effective, has never been tested in DS.

Hypothesis: tDCS is effective and safe for depression with catatonia in DS, improving mood, cognition, and motor symptoms.

Objectives:

Primary: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 15 sessions of bifrontal tDCS on depression with catatonia in DS (Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS)).

Secondary: To evaluate safety, long-term clinical and cognitive effects (1 and 3 months), EEG correlates, and biological effects (cortisol, BDNF, cytokines).

Methodology: Multicenter (2 sites), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 30 DS patients will receive 15 sessions of active tDCS (2 mA, 20 min, anode over left DLPFC, cathode over right DLPFC) or sham tDCS.

Outcomes:

Primary: Changes in depressive/catatonic symptoms (BFCRS) between Day 0 and Day 5.

Secondary: Safety, clinical (MADRS, UPDRS), cognitive (SIB), EEG, and biological (blood, saliva) assessments.

Target Population: Men and women with DS with a depressive episode and catatonia (30 patients).

Inclusion Criteria: DS, age \> 18 years, major depression with catatonia (DSM-5), informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy, contraindication to tDCS, refusal. Statistical Analyses: ANOVA or mixed models for BFCRS scores. Justification for Inclusion: To provide a safe, non-pharmacological therapeutic alternative.

Withdrawal Criteria: Withdrawal of consent, severe pathology. Procedures: Clinical, cognitive, EEG, and biological (blood, saliva) assessments at Day 0, Day 1, Day 5, 1 and 3 months.

Recruitment: 6 sites (CH Vinatier Lyon, CHU Nantes, CHU Dijon, CHU Clermont Ferrand, CH Rouen, GHU Neurosciences Paris). EEG and biological analyses at Lyon and Paris only.

Number of Subjects: 62 patients (31 per group). Duration: Inclusion (24 months), individual participation (3 months), total study (27 months).

Locations: CH Le Vinatier (Lyon), CHU Nantes, CHU Dijon, CHU Clermont Ferrand, CH Rouen, GHU Neurosciences Paris.

Benefit-Risk Ratio: Pioneering study on tDCS in DS, aiming for a safe alternative to current treatments and a better understanding of neurobiological mechanisms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Down Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicenter (6 sites), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study. Patients will be randomly assigned to a group receiving 15 sessions of active tDCS (3 sessions per day for 5 days, from D0 to D5, with the tDCS anode placed over the left DLPFC and the cathode over the right DLPFC, located using the international 10/20 electrode placement system, each stimulation lasting 20 minutes at 2mA), or to a group receiving 15 sessions of sham stimulation (same electrode montage and stimulation duration, but without current). Participation in the EEG and biology component will be limited to the Lyon and Paris centers.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active tDCS

Group receiving 15 sessions of active tDCS (3 sessions per day for 5 days, from D0 to D5, with the tDCS anode placed over the left DLPFC and the cathode over the right DLPFC, located using the international 10/20 electrode placement system, each stimulation lasting 20 minutes at 2mA).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcranial stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

A randomized, 2-arm, sham-controlled study, patients with Down syndrome presenting with major depressive episode (DSM5) with catatonic features will be randomly allocated to receive 15 sessions of either active (20 min, 2mA, ramp up/down 30 sec) or sham tDCS (20 min, ramp up/down 30 sec at the beginning and at the end of each stimulation session), thrice daily. Each stimulation session will be spaced at least two hours apart. The anode will be placed over the left DLPFC, the cathode over the right DLPFC using the Beam F3 algorithm in order to individualize target location based on head circumference, tragus to tragus and inion to nasion distances.

Sham tDCS

Group receiving 15 sessions of sham stimulation (same electrode montage and stimulation duration, but without current).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Transcranial stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

A randomized, 2-arm, sham-controlled study, patients with Down syndrome presenting with major depressive episode (DSM5) with catatonic features will be randomly allocated to receive 15 sessions of either active (20 min, 2mA, ramp up/down 30 sec) or sham tDCS (20 min, ramp up/down 30 sec at the beginning and at the end of each stimulation session), thrice daily. Each stimulation session will be spaced at least two hours apart. The anode will be placed over the left DLPFC, the cathode over the right DLPFC using the Beam F3 algorithm in order to individualize target location based on head circumference, tragus to tragus and inion to nasion distances.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial stimulation

A randomized, 2-arm, sham-controlled study, patients with Down syndrome presenting with major depressive episode (DSM5) with catatonic features will be randomly allocated to receive 15 sessions of either active (20 min, 2mA, ramp up/down 30 sec) or sham tDCS (20 min, ramp up/down 30 sec at the beginning and at the end of each stimulation session), thrice daily. Each stimulation session will be spaced at least two hours apart. The anode will be placed over the left DLPFC, the cathode over the right DLPFC using the Beam F3 algorithm in order to individualize target location based on head circumference, tragus to tragus and inion to nasion distances.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with Down syndrome
* Age \> 18
* Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder MDD with catatonic symptoms according to the DSM-5 criteria
* Informed consent signed by the patient, by the patient under curatorship, or by the legal representative in the case of a patient under guardianship.
* Person affiliated to the French social security system or equivalent

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy (checked with a pregnancy test)
* Contraindication for tDCS(i.e., cochlear implant)
* Refusal of the patients or their legal representatives
* Other persons protected under the CSP (judicial safeguard, family habilitation)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hôpital le Vinatier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

CAROLINE C DEMILY, MD PhD HDR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HOPITAL VINATIER

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

JEROME J BRUNELIN, PhD, HDR)

Role: CONTACT

00334 37 91 54 95

VERONIQUE V VIAL

Role: CONTACT

0033437915522

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PHRC-23-0027

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2024-A00452-45

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.