Efficacy and Safety of Cranial Electrical Stimulation (CES) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

NCT ID: NCT01325532

Last Updated: 2016-06-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see if using Cranial Electrical Stimulation (CES) helps improve symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). The investigators are studying the device's effectiveness in treating depression, as well as its safety. This is a pilot study.

Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active CES or sham CES, every weekday for 3 weeks. During the visits, subjects will receive CES or sham CES treatment for 20 minutes.

The primary outcome measure will be change in score on the HAM-D 17. The secondary outcome measure will be change in patient-reported sleep score.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We examined efficacy and safety of one specific cranial electrical stimulator (CES) device at a fixed setting in subjects with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD). Thirty subjects with MDD and inadequate response to standard antidepressants were randomized to 3 weeks of treatment with CES (15/500/15000 Hz, symmetrical rectangular biphasic current of 1-4 mAmp, 40 Volts) or sham CES (device off) for 20 minutes, 5 days per week. The primary outcome measure was improvement in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17). Adverse effects (AEs) were assessed using the Patient Related Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE). We hypothesized that subjects who received active as opposed to sham CES would have a significantly greater improvement in their depression symptoms. Due to the small sample, we could not hypothesize an effect size, but would calculate one to determine signal strength to guide the design of a larger, more rigorous study. As an exploratory aim, we also examined whether CES would benefit sleep.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active CES

Active CES: The FW-100 Cranial Stimulator headset was placed on the scalp over the two dorsolateral prefrontal cortex areas. The power knob was turned to maximum setting. The waveform contains a 15000Hz square wave carrier from 0-4 mAmp. The first 15Hz modulating signal provides 50msec of "on" and 16.7msec of "off" time (total 66.7msec, 50% duty cycle). A second 500Hz modulating signal changes the "on" time series of 15000Hz pulses (750 pulses/50msec) into 25 smaller bursts of 15 pulses of the 15000Hz carrier signal, for 375 pulses in 50msec. The consecutive positive burst and "off" time is followed by an opposite negative burst and "off" time, balancing the current component to zero. Output voltage ranges from 0-40V, positive and negative. CES automatically shut off after 20 mins.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active CES

Intervention Type DEVICE

CES current

Sham CES

Shame CES: The sham devices were modified to not deliver current to the headset. The current from the active device departs from the posts at the top of the device into the headsets, creating a loop when the headset is worn by the subject with the wet electrode sponges. This loop is eliminated in the sham devices by wrapping wire around the posts, thus containing the loop within the device, with no electricity leaving the headsets. This approach allows the loop to be maintained, and therefore all of the device's green and yellow amperage lights still light up, protecting the blind.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham CES

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham CES (device off) for 20-minutes each day 5 days/week for 3 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active CES

CES current

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham CES

Sham CES (device off) for 20-minutes each day 5 days/week for 3 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FW-100 Fisher Wallace Cranial Stimulator Formerly known as: Liss Cranial Stimulator Model SBL202-B FW-100 Fisher Wallace Cranial Stimulator (sham setting) Formerly known as: Liss Cranial Stimulator Model SBL202-B

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to participate in the study:

1. Age 18-65 years old
2. Be in generally good health
3. Meet criteria for Major Depressive Disorder based on the DSM-IV
4. HAM-D-17 score ≥ 15, and ≤ 23

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will not be allowed to participate in the study:

1. Taking any antidepressant medications (including natural products such as omega-3, St John's wort, and/or SAMe)
2. Having any unstable health conditions (unstable cardiovascular illness, cardiac arrhythmia, presence of a pacemaker, epilepsy and shock, fever, weakness and hypotension, or presence of a vagal nerve stimulator)
3. Having any electrical stimulation implants - i.e. pacemaker, deep brain stimulators (VNS, DBS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS)
4. Psychotic or manic symptoms, or other evidence of a psychotic disorder; recent history of substance abuse or dependence
5. Electro Convulsive Therapy (ECT) during the last year
6. Previous course of Cranial Electrical Stimulation
7. Current active suicidal or self-injurious potential necessitating immediate treatment
8. In women, pregnancy, plans to conceive, or unwillingness to comply with birth control requirements
9. Depression-focused psychotherapy initiated within 90 days preceding enrollment or during participation in study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fisher Wallace Labs, LLC

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Mischoulon, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Mischoulon, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Depression Clinical and Research Program at Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mischoulon D, De Jong MF, Vitolo OV, Cusin C, Dording CM, Yeung AS, Durham K, Parkin SR, Fava M, Dougherty DD. Efficacy and safety of a form of cranial electrical stimulation (CES) as an add-on intervention for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: A three week double blind pilot study. J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Nov;70:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26424428 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010 P000461

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Adaptive tDCS for Treatment-Resistant MDD
NCT02942368 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA