Comparing Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Fracture Hip Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06865469
Last Updated: 2025-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE3
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-01
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hip fractures are devastating injuries, constituting a global public health burden and remain one of the largest healthcare challenges of the 21st century. The incidence increases with advancing age and the number of hip fractures is expected to increase to 6.26 million per year in 2050.
Hip fractures impact on patient's psychological, functional, and social wellbeing, and account for substantial healthcare system costs.
Drugs of potential interest such as intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine and dexmedetomidine have been administered both intra and/or postoperatively to decrease perioperative pain and improve other outcomes. Lidoocaine has analgesic, anti inflammatory, and anti hyperalgesia properties.
Several studies have demonstrated that perioperative lidocaine infusion reduces postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption .
Ease of availability, cost effectiveness, simplicity of administration, safety, and analgesic action make lignocaine an attractive option.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective and specific α2 adrenoceptor agonist with useful analgesic, sedative, anxiolytic, and sympatholytic properties.
I.V. dexmedetomidine has gained immense popularity owing to its efficacy as an analgesic adjuvant, translating into reduced opioid consumption.
Intraoperative dexmedetomidine and lignocaine also confirm the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol advocating the reduction of opioid use.
While numerous studies have analyzed i.v. lidoocaine and dexmedetomidine versus placebo regarding postoperative analgesia and outcomes, researches and evidence in the context of minimally invasive surgeries regarding adverse effect profile, postoperative analgesic requirement, perioperative analgesia, anesthesia recovery, and opioid requirements are always welcome(rephrase). Our study was conducted to analyze the effects of intraoperative i.v. lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on pain relief, intra- and postoperative opioid consumption, and effects of these infusions on intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and to evaluate the side effect profiles the aim of the study to analyze the effects of intraoperative intravenous lignocaine/dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain relief and analgesit consumption
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Perioperative iv Dexmedetomidine vs. Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Consumption and Recovery After Abdominal Gynaecological Surgery
NCT03363425
Postoperative Analgesia With Local Infiltration After Hip Fracture Of Intertrochanteric Type
NCT01119209
Comparsion Between Intrathecal Fentanyl and Intravenous Nalbuphine As a Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Limb Surgeries
NCT06720506
Is Analgesic Effect of Low Dose Ketamine-midazolam the Same as Morphine
NCT01807429
Perioperative Pain Management for Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT06662318
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group D
patients will recive dexmedetomidine i.v. infusion at 0.4 μg/kg/h
Dexmedetomidine
dexmedetomidine will be administered by i.v. infusion at 0.4 μg/kg/h
Group L
patients will received 1.5 mg/kg/h lidocaine hydrochloride 2% (400 mg/20 mL) by i.v. infusion.
Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2%
lidocaine hydrochloride 2% (400 mg/20 mL) 1.5 mg/kg/h by i.v. infusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
dexmedetomidine will be administered by i.v. infusion at 0.4 μg/kg/h
Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2%
lidocaine hydrochloride 2% (400 mg/20 mL) 1.5 mg/kg/h by i.v. infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients with both sex
* patients who are American society of Anesthesiologists class I or II
Exclusion Criteria
* body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2.
* History of hypersensitivity to the drugs being evaluated
* Inability to comprehend postoperatively the pain assessment scale/neuropsychiatric disorders.
* chronic use of opioids and opioid addiction
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hisham Mamdouh Kotp Mohamed
residant doctor at Assiut university hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dex vs lidocaine fracture hip
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.