Computational Assessment of GABA Receptor Modulation in PTSD
NCT ID: NCT06852469
Last Updated: 2025-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-01
2029-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neural Correlates of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
NCT00928941
Cognitively Augmented Behavioral Activation for Veterans With Comorbid TBI/PTSD
NCT02391402
Transdiagnostic Psychotherapy for Veterans With Mood and Anxiety Disorders
NCT01947647
Comparing Individual Therapies for Veterans With Depression, PTSD, and Panic Disorder
NCT04293341
Cognitive Control Training for Extinction in PTSD
NCT06629064
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators have developed the rapid assessment of motor processing (RAMP) paradigm, a computational goal-directed control task which enables precise estimation of a dynamic inhibition parameter. Compared to other behavioral measures, dynamic inhibition exhibits excellent measurement reliability. Dynamic inhibition is negatively associated with subjective fear, and this relationship persists after controlling for general negative affect. Critically, dynamic inhibition is lower in an HA-PTSD subgroup (with high residual fear, controlling for negative affect) compared to both a low arousal PTSD (LA-PTSD) subgroup and healthy controls (HC). Dynamic inhibition is also associated with structure and function in arousal-related regions such as dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and insula.
Benzodiazepines are robust positive GABA receptor modulators which acutely reduce anxious arousal but result in tolerance and side effects when used chronically. Several novel pharmacotherapies (either FDA-approved for other indications or currently in development) may chronically normalize deficient GABA signaling without the downsides of chronic benzodiazepines. Given heterogeneity in PTSD, precision phenotyping will be critical for assigning these treatments to Veterans most likely to benefit, i.e. to an HA-PTSD group with deficient GABA signaling. The investigators propose that RAMP dynamic inhibition can serve as a specific, objective phenotypic target for positive GABA modulation in HA-PTSD. While preliminary data from the investigators has established a specific relationship between dynamic inhibition and fear (relative to negative affect), a crucial step prior to clinical use is validation of the relationship between dynamic inhibition and GABA receptor modulation. The investigators propose to test this causal relationship using the benzodiazepine lorazepam as a pharmacologic probe (rather than a clinical treatment). The validated phenotypic target can then be used for subgroup assignment and mechanistic outcome-tracking in trials of novel GABAergic agents for HA-PTSD.
The investigators hypothesize that the HA-PTSD group will show greater enhancement in dynamic inhibition than other groups with lorazepam compared to placebo. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose a randomized crossover study in which HA-PTSD, LA-PTSD, and HC Veterans receive a single dose of the lorazepam and placebo in separate experimental sessions in which they perform the RAMP paradigm. Research suggests that arousal-related neural regions may specifically mediate the benefits of GABAergic modulation in HA-PTSD, which could enable targeting of more specific GABAergic treatments. The investigators will therefore examine specific neural mechanisms of GABAergic modulation using fMRI combined with dynamic inhibition as a phenotypic marker.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lorazepam 1 mg, then placebo
Participants will first receive a single dose of lorazepam 1 mg on the first testing session. After a 1 week washout period, participants will then receive a single dose of placebo on the second testing session.
Lorazepam 1 mg tablet
Lorazepam is an oral medication which is FDA approved to treat anxiety.
Placebo tablet
Placebo will match the study drug in mode of administration, color, size, and taste.
Placebo, then lorazepam 1 mg
Participants will first receive a single dose of placebo on the first testing session. After a 1 week washout period, participants will then receive a single dose of lorazepam 1 mg on the second testing session.
Lorazepam 1 mg tablet
Lorazepam is an oral medication which is FDA approved to treat anxiety.
Placebo tablet
Placebo will match the study drug in mode of administration, color, size, and taste.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lorazepam 1 mg tablet
Lorazepam is an oral medication which is FDA approved to treat anxiety.
Placebo tablet
Placebo will match the study drug in mode of administration, color, size, and taste.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. 18-65 years of age, inclusive;
3. Participants must be willing to abstain from alcohol 24 hours prior to and 24 hours after the testing session;
4. Participants must be able to participate and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the study restrictions;
(a) Current diagnosis of PTSD based on CAPS-5.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy (assessed by urine test at time of screening and prior to administration of study medication) or lactation;
3. Lifetime history of a chronic psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder type I as assessed by MINI;
4. Current moderate or severe substance use disorder as assessed by MINI;
5. Positive urine toxicology (drugs of abuse as determined by a positive urine test) at screening and before drug administration. Subjects who screen positive for THC will be given an opportunity to be included in the event of a negative urine test 2 weeks later. THC is not infrequently used for medicinal purposes and, in California, is legal for recreational use. Subjects who are positive for THC will therefore not be excluded, but will be retested to ensure that THC is unlikely to be influencing results;
6. Self-report or observable signs of drug or alcohol intoxication or withdrawal;
7. Current benzodiazepine or opioid use; other psychotropic medications are allowed as long as they are at a stable dose for at least 2 weeks and do not exhibit an unsafe interaction with the study medication;
8. Current or recent use of any medication deemed by the study physician (Dr. Howlett) to exhibit an unsafe interaction with lorazepam;
9. Past intolerance (including allergic) to lorazepam or another benzodiazepine;
10. Active suicidal ideation or otherwise considered at high suicidal risk by trained study staff using the C-SSRS;
11. History of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) resulting in loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes;
12. Volunteers who do not have sufficient command of the English language, or who have any other impairment that would prevent them from reading and understanding the informed consent form(s) and completing the study procedures including clinical testing;
13. Any other reason why, per study physician, the subject should not participate in this study, including concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with, or for which the study drug might interfere with, the conduct of the study, or that would, in the opinion of the study physician, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject in this study.
(a) Axis I disorder as assessed by MINI.
1. Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging.
2. Not right-handed as assessed by Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan R Howlett, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MHBP-009-24S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.