Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-13
2023-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The current proposal aims to bridge research on basic neurocognitive mechanisms of PTSD with intervention research by conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a cognitive control training program in 80 Veterans with PTSD. Veterans will complete computer-based training exercises designed to specifically target and improve aspects of cognitive control. Veterans will complete the program twice per week for eight weeks. Symptoms will be assessed before and after treatment, as well as at a two month follow up time point. The primary goal of the study is to examine the effect of the intervention on PTSD symptoms and cognitive deficits. Evaluating symptom change as a result of the intervention will provide critical data regarding the utility of this program as a PTSD treatment. If effective, this training program could serve as alternative treatment option for Veterans with PTSD, and could be translated into an easily transportable intervention for dissemination (e.g., through web-based platforms). A secondary goal is to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to better understand the mechanisms by which cognitive training culminates in symptom reduction. If training cognitive control with neurotherapeutics directly enhances functioning of specific neural substrates as hypothesized, improvements in affective processes relying on shared neural regions would also be predicted. Modifying functioning in these substrates with training may thus reduce symptoms by improving neural functioning while processing and managing trauma-related affect and information. Neural systems used for cognitive control targeted in the training described (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex \[dlPFC\]) are also recruited when individuals mentally manipulate emotional information, such as when individuals use reappraisal to change the way that they think about negative emotional situations or content. In this study, Veterans will complete a neutral cognitive control task and a reappraisal task while undergoing fMRI before and after completing the training treatment. This will be the first study to evaluate neurobiological mechanisms of this type of training in PTSD, which is a fundamental next step for understanding how to improve the training program and who may be best served by completing it.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognition and Psychotherapy in PTSD
NCT03641924
Assessment and Treatment of Cognitive Functioning Deficits in Veterans With PTSD
NCT03696225
Neural Correlates of Cognitive Rehabilitation in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
NCT00928941
Enhancement of PTSD Treatment With Computerized Executive Function Training
NCT03260127
Efficacy and Neural Mediators of Response to Trauma Management Therapy for PTSD
NCT03449576
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PTSD is characterized by deficits in "top-down" cognitive control abilities, as evidenced by neuropsychological findings of poor executive functioning and neurobiological evidence of diminished prefrontal cortical activity coupled with exaggerated limbic activity. Cognitive control deficits are causally implicated in re-experiencing symptoms, suggesting that cognitive control may be a novel and effective treatment target. The investigator developed a cognitive control training intervention that has demonstrated initial evidence of efficacy in civilian women with PTSD secondary to sexual assault. However, the effects of this program in Veteran participants and the precise neurocognitive mechanisms of symptom reduction in the intervention remain poorly understood. If training cognitive control directly enhances functioning of specific cognitive systems that are causally implicated in the etiology of emotional and cognitive symptoms, treatment-related improvements in affective symptoms and neuropsychological performance within the trained domain would be predicted. From a neurobiological perspective, training cognition is thought to operate via modification of specific neural substrates, suggesting that training effects should generalize to affective processes relying on shared neural regions. One such affective process is reappraisal (i.e., generating different ways of thinking about emotional content in order to regulate emotion), which requires cognitive control over affective emotional information, and depends on brain circuits identified as key cognitive control regions (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dlPFC). PTSD is characterized by aberrant affective and neurobiological patterns during reappraisal that likely contribute to persistent re-experiencing and hyperarousal symptoms. Training may reduce symptoms by improving neural functioning of cognitive control regions during affective control processes (e.g., reappraisal) that are critical to managing trauma-related affect.
In this proposal, the applicant's prior clinical trials research experience will be integrated with new mentoring in functional neuroimaging (fMRI) to facilitate identification of treatment-related symptom and neural change following cognitive control training. Bridging research on basic neurocognitive mechanisms of PTSD with intervention research in this way will ultimately facilitate precise neurotherapeutic treatment development and personalization techniques. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), 80 Veterans with PTSD will be assigned to the cognitive control training program developed by the applicant (intervention condition: COGnitive ENhancement Training \[COGENT\]), or a minimal cognitive control program (sham training condition \[ST\]) completed twice week for 8 weeks. The COGENT training program requires participants to repeatedly utilize specific cognitive control functions (i.e., interference control) in the context of a modified working memory capacity task, with the goal of improving performance through implicit, practice-based learning. The primary outcome will be PTSD symptom reduction, and cognitive generalization will be assessed with a brief neuropsychological assessment. To evaluate changes in the neural bases proposed to underlie COGENT, participants will undergo fMRI while completing two cognitive control tasks (affectively neutral and emotionally balanced) before and after treatment. Assessments will occur at baseline, post-treatment, and at follow-up.
Aim 1: To examine the effects of the training program on PTSD and neurocognitive symptoms in Veterans. PTSD symptoms will be measured using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) interview and neurocognitive functioning will be assessed with Delis Kaplan Executive Functioning System subtests. Individuals completing COGENT are hypothesized to show a) greater reduction in PTSD re-experiencing symptoms and b) improved neurocognitive performance relative to those in ST over time. Exploratory aims will also examine changes in PTSD diagnostic status across groups.
Aim 2: To examine neurobiological changes in COGENT versus ST during neutral and affective cognitive control tasks. Neurobiological response to treatment will be assessed using fMRI during cognitive control tasks (one affectively neutral working memory capacity task and one affectively balanced reappraisal task with negative emotional information). Individuals completing the COGENT program are predicted to demonstrate increased neural activation of dlPFC and anterior cingulate regions from pre- to post-training during the tasks. Exploratory aims will evaluate corresponding physiological change during the affective fMRI task and the utility of fMRI neural functioning at baseline for predicting treatment response.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
COGENT
Participants will be Veterans assigned to the active cognitive training (see below for details).
COGENT COGNITIVE TRAINING
Computer-administered cognitive training program. COGENT is a modified working memory capacity task designed to train cognitive functioning. COGENT was designed to contain high interference across trials. By requiring repeated practice with utilization of interference control across trials, COGENT is thought to enhance plasticity of cognitive systems and improve performance. That is, training is based on the premise that learning-based neural changes will occur via repeated exposure to a task demanding cognitive control resources
Non-Training
Participants will be Veterans assigned to a non-training cognitive program matched for time and memory demands (see below for details).
Non training computer condition
The non-training condition requires participants to complete a similar computer task for the same length of time. The non-training is a modified working memory capacity task designed to be inert. The non-training condition was designed to contain relatively less interference demands across trials. Participants are required to remember the same total number of items as in COGENT (i.e., storage requirements were equivalent), but the task contains relatively less interference inherent in the task.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
COGENT COGNITIVE TRAINING
Computer-administered cognitive training program. COGENT is a modified working memory capacity task designed to train cognitive functioning. COGENT was designed to contain high interference across trials. By requiring repeated practice with utilization of interference control across trials, COGENT is thought to enhance plasticity of cognitive systems and improve performance. That is, training is based on the premise that learning-based neural changes will occur via repeated exposure to a task demanding cognitive control resources
Non training computer condition
The non-training condition requires participants to complete a similar computer task for the same length of time. The non-training is a modified working memory capacity task designed to be inert. The non-training condition was designed to contain relatively less interference demands across trials. Participants are required to remember the same total number of items as in COGENT (i.e., storage requirements were equivalent), but the task contains relatively less interference inherent in the task.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* meet primary, current DSM-5 criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
* are literate in English
* intend to remain in the San Diego geographical area for the duration of the study
* are willing to attend assessment and treatment sessions
Exclusion Criteria
* devices such as pacemakers
* metal fragments in the skin like shrapnel
* history of metal work or welding
* history of eye surgery or washes because of metal
* aortic/aneurysm clips
* prosthesis
* bypass surgery/coronary artery clips
* hearing aids
* heart-valve replacement
* intrauterine devices with metal
* shunts
* electrodes
* metal plates/pins/screws
* neuro or bio-stimulators
* older tattoos with metal ink
* piercings the subject is unable or unwilling to remove
* uncorrectable vision problems
* claustrophobia
* inability to lie still on the back for approximately one hour
* inability to safely fit within the dimensions of the fMRI machine
* prior neurosurgery
* pregnancy or current breastfeeding (within 3 months)
* current IV drug use due to potential cerebrovascular effects
* or any other conditions that are deemed by Keck Imaging Center staff to contraindicated to safely complete the fMRI scanning
* a lifetime history of psychotic disorders
* lifetime history of bipolar disorder
* severe substance use disorder within the last year
* other psychiatric conditions that may adversely impact cognition and/or are deemed to require other primary psychological intervention
* history of any neurological disorder that might be associated with cognitive dysfunction, e.g.:
* cerebrovascular accident
* intracranial surgery
* aneurysm
* seizure disorder
* acute suicidality (defined as intent, plan, and/or attempt for severe self-harm within the past 3 months)
* or current circumstances that present a direct threat to the individual and require more imminent intervention, e.g.:
* current domestic abuse
* individuals planning to begin medication changes within the time-frame of the study
* individuals currently undergoing evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD
* individuals planning non-PTSD related psychosocial therapy change within the pre- to post-treatment time frame of the study
* those with life-threatening or acutely unstable medical conditions
21 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jessica A Bomyea, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CX001600-01A1
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MHBB-023-17S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.