Model Development and Temporal Validation of the Predictive Factors for Return to Work After Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT06842420
Last Updated: 2025-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
1375 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-05
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Pilot Return-to-Work Cognitive Intervention After Stroke
NCT07116187
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Portable Robotic Gait Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke
NCT03444688
Effects of Two Different Kinds of Exercise on Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT00108680
An Exploratory Study of a Wearable Robotic Hand Orthosis
NCT06412237
Early Functional Training in Acute Stroke Inpatient Ward
NCT04488692
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Significant economic costs are incurred because of stroke, which do not include further economic costs from the downstream loss of earnings and caregiver burden. Existing prediction models of return-to-work have area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) between 0.65 and 0.80. However, these models have not been assessed for calibration or clinical utility. No externally validated prediction model exists for return-to-work after stroke. There are advantages to having a prediction model. One of the concerns of patients and their families involve the loss of income as a result of stroke. The prediction model would help to prognosticate, as well as assist to set appropriate rehabilitation goals for the patient. Suitable patients can be directed to return to work services, if necessary.
Health is related to one's employment and financial position. Being able to return to gainful employment can result in better general and mental health5. People with disabilities employed in the past year reported better general and mental health than their peers with the same disabilities who were unemployed.
This study could be completed in 1 to 2 years and a prospective study involving external validation can be simultaneously performed with NUHS collaborators over 2 to 2.5 years. Both projects could be published in the next 2 to 3 years upon obtaining the grant for the temporal validation study. Thereafter, a Return to work calculator could be designed and launched in the next 4 years.
Hypothesis This study seeks to collect 1375 patient data who had completed inpatient stroke rehabilitation between the time periods of 2018-2025. We seek to further train our development model and to perform a temporal validation on this model.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stroke patients who had completed inpatient stroke rehabilitation between 2018-2025
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of a first ever stroke
3. Patients who were working prior to stroke
4. Consent given
Exclusion Criteria
2. Did not require inpatient stroke rehabilitation
3. Not working prior to stroke
4. No consent obtained
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Changi General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023/2526
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.