Woodsmoke Exposure, Influenza Infection, and Nasal Immunity

NCT ID: NCT06841913

Last Updated: 2025-06-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-10-01

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will investigate the effects of woodsmoke (WS) exposure on human nasal mucosal immune responses to viral infection. The study tests the hypotheses that WS exposure modifies biomarkers of nasal mucosal immune function, increases in Live Attenuated Influenza Virus (LAIV) -induced nasal symptoms, and reduces mucosal antibody production.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will investigate the effects of woodsmoke (WS) exposure on human nasal mucosal immune responses to viral infection. The study tests the hypotheses that WS exposure modifies biomarkers of nasal mucosal immune function, increases LAIV-induced nasal symptoms, and reduces mucosal antibody production. Healthy volunteers will be randomized for a 2-hr exposure to WS or placebo (filtered air) and then inoculated with either live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) or placebo. Nasal mucosal samples, symptoms, and peripheral blood will be collected on days 1,2,3,7, and 21 post-exposure/LAIV and assessed for a) mucosal antiviral responses using targeted and non-targeted analysis of the secretome and tissue-level gene expression; b) symptoms, virus quantity, differential cell count, and virus-specific antibody levels; and c) biomarker signatures associated with infection outcomes using computational modeling tools.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Smoke Exposure Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

25% of participants (N=100 total for the study) will undergo each of the following.

Wood smoke followed by LAIV (N=25) Wood smoke followed by Placebo (N=25) Clean Air followed by LAIV (N=25) Clean Air followed by Placebo (N=25)

Males and females will be equally enrolled into each of the above cohorts.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
This is a randomized, double-blinded study so packaging and labeling by IDS is such that both study participants and study personnel (lab techs) will be blinded to the treatment (either LAIV or placebo) given. Due to the smell of the WS it will not be possible to completely blind subjects or coordinators as to exposure. The contractor maintaining the woodsmoke exposure chamber add a small amount of woodsmoke into the chamber to minimize bias. The risk for bias is felt to be minimal because all of the study's primary and most of the secondary outcomes are laboratory assays for which the technicians performing the assays will be blinded as to subject group. Unblinding will occur at the conclusion of the study or earlier if needed for safety purposes and as dictated by the UNC IRB, study sponsor, and DSMB.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Wood smoke followed by LAIV

Participants will receive LAIV after a 2 hour wood smoke exposure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LAIV nasal vaccine is chosen as a model viral infection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Inoculation with LAIV

Wood smoke

Intervention Type OTHER

Wood smoke exposure concentrations at 500 ug/m3 for two hours.

Wood smoke followed by Placebo

Participants will receive a LAIV placebo after a 2 hour wood smoke exposure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Wood smoke

Intervention Type OTHER

Wood smoke exposure concentrations at 500 ug/m3 for two hours.

Placebo for LAIV nasal vaccine is chosen as a model viral infection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo for LAIV inoculation. Nasal administration of normal saline.

Clean Air followed by LAIV

Participants will receive LAIV after a 2 hour clean air exposure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LAIV nasal vaccine is chosen as a model viral infection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Inoculation with LAIV

Placebo for Wood Smoke (clean Air Exposure)

Intervention Type OTHER

Clean Air Exposure for 2 hours

Clean Air followed by Placebo

Participants will receive a LAIV placebo after a 2 hour clean air exposure.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo for LAIV nasal vaccine is chosen as a model viral infection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo for LAIV inoculation. Nasal administration of normal saline.

Placebo for Wood Smoke (clean Air Exposure)

Intervention Type OTHER

Clean Air Exposure for 2 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LAIV nasal vaccine is chosen as a model viral infection

Inoculation with LAIV

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Wood smoke

Wood smoke exposure concentrations at 500 ug/m3 for two hours.

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo for LAIV nasal vaccine is chosen as a model viral infection

Placebo for LAIV inoculation. Nasal administration of normal saline.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo for Wood Smoke (clean Air Exposure)

Clean Air Exposure for 2 hours

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine Flumist

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Normal lung function,
* oxygen saturation of \>94%,
* normal blood pressure,
* no respiratory symptoms on history, no abnormalities on exam, normal pulmonary function testing,
* 18-49 Years of age.

Exclusion Criteria

* A history of significant chronic illnesses (to include diabetes, autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiency state, known ischemic heart disease, chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, hypertension)
* Positive pregnancy test within 48 hours of the time of challenge
* Use of any inhaled substance (for medical or recreational purposes).
* Nonsmokers must have been abstinent from smoking for the prior 12 months, having not smoked more than 1 pack over the course of the previous year.
* History of allergy to eggs
* Acute, non-chronic, medical conditions, including (but not limited to) pneumonia or bronchitis requiring antibiotics, febrile illnesses, flu-like symptoms must be totally resolved symptomatically for 3 weeks
* Unspecified illnesses, which in the judgment of the investigator increase the risk associated with the experimental LAIV infection, will be a basis for exclusion.
* Expected exposure of subject to immunocompromised individuals (who can be infected by LAIV) for the 3 weeks following LAIV inoculation.
* Use of immunosuppressive drugs within the past 6 months.
* Previous Woodsmoke exposure \<3 weeks, which is considered to an appropriate washout period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meghan Rebuli, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UNC

Terry Noah, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UNC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Human Studies Facility

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01ES036209-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

24-1802

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.