Effect of ADT and ARPI on Bone Loss of Patients with Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06838520
Last Updated: 2025-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-01
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating Bone and Skeletal Muscle Interaction in Men With Prostate Cancer
NCT03386812
Healthy Bones Study
NCT01973673
Bone Loss in Men on Androgen Blockade as Adjuvant Therapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT00199537
Bone Health Observational Study
NCT00632905
Strategies to Improve Bone Health in Men on ADT
NCT02043236
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While ADT treatment benefits patients with metastatic prostate cancer, it also leads to numerous side effects, such as cardiovascular diseases, changes in body composition, decreased bone mineral density (BMD), hot flashes, gynecomastia, cognitive decline, fatigue, anemia, and sexual dysfunction. ADT treatment can affect the number and function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts through various pathways, disrupting the balance of bone remodeling and leading to cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Under normal conditions, testosterone can be converted to estradiol via aromatase and bind to the estrogen receptors on the surface of osteoclasts, indirectly regulating these cells. With increasing age, the bioactivity of both testosterone and estrogen declines in normal men, resulting in low-turnover bone metabolic changes and a bone loss rate of 0.5% to 1% per year. In patients undergoing ADT, the levels of testosterone and estrogen decrease more significantly, and the number of osteoclasts increases markedly. Moreover, ADT treatment can reduce muscle mass and increase fat, leading to sarcopenic obesity, which is accompanied by chronic low-grade inflammation throughout the body and disrupts bone homeostasis. ADT may also lower the levels of circulating vitamin D, which not only affects bone mineralization but also has adverse effects on skeletal muscle and prostate cancer itself. Studies have shown that after 12 months of ADT treatment, the median lumbar spine BMD in patients decreased by an average of 3.6%, higher than that in untreated elderly men (0.5% to 1%). The BLADE study (NCT03202381) confirmed that long-term ADT treatment with either Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists or antagonists significantly reduces bone quality. In fact, bone loss caused by ADT treatment can also lead to skeletal-related events (SREs), represented by pathological fractures, bone radiotherapy, bone surgery, and spinal cord compression.
ARPIs play a crucial role in the treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer cells often rely on androgens for growth, and ARPIs work by blocking the androgen receptor pathway, thereby inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells. These inhibitors, such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, have significantly improved outcomes for patients with advanced prostate cancer, including those with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). By reducing the levels of androgens or blocking their effects, ARPIs may also negatively impact bone quality in patients with prostate cancer. These agents, by reducing androgen levels, may lead to decreased BMD and increased fracture risk.
The impact of combining ADT with ARPIs on bone quality remains unclear. While clinical trial data on ARPIs in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) have shown mixed results regarding bone health. Further research is needed to fully understand the combined effects of ADT and ARPIs on bone quality. It is essential to gain a deeper understanding of the patterns of osteoporosis to provide most effective bone-protective therapies to prevent the occurrence of SREs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: ADT alone
Men with locally advanced prostate cancer or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, about to start treatment.
ADT including LHRH agonist and antagonist.
Bone health assessment
Assessments of physical function, DXA scan
Group B: ADT + ARPIs
Men with locally advanced prostate cancer or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, about to start treatment.
ADT including LHRH agonist and antagonist. ARPIs including Abiraterone Acetate, Enzalutamide, Apalutamide, Darolutamide or Rezvilutamide.
Bone health assessment
Assessments of physical function, DXA scan
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bone health assessment
Assessments of physical function, DXA scan
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed prostate cancer;
3. Clinical stage of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC);
4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score ≤ 2;
5. Life expectancy ≥ 12 months;
6. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Having previously received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or other pharmacological treatments (e.g., denosumab, bisphosphonates, or corticosteroids).
3. Having osteoporosis at baseline (T-score ≤ -2.5).
4. Having known bone diseases.
5. Having spinal metastases confirmed by imaging (e.g., ECT, MRI, CT, or PSMA PET-CT).
6. Having poor general condition (i.e., ECOG ≥ 4).
7. Having a life expectancy of less than 12 months.
8. Having elevated serum PSA levels (≥4 ng/dL) or testosterone levels (≥50 ng/dL) after 6 months of ADT.
18 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bianjiang Liu
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital
Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bouillon R, Marcocci C, Carmeliet G, Bikle D, White JH, Dawson-Hughes B, Lips P, Munns CF, Lazaretti-Castro M, Giustina A, Bilezikian J. Skeletal and Extraskeletal Actions of Vitamin D: Current Evidence and Outstanding Questions. Endocr Rev. 2019 Aug 1;40(4):1109-1151. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00126.
D'Andrea S, Martorella A, Coccia F, Castellini C, Minaldi E, Totaro M, Parisi A, Francavilla F, Francavilla S, Barbonetti A. Relationship of Vitamin D status with testosterone levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2021 Apr;72(1):49-61. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02482-3. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
Feng W, Guo J, Li M. RANKL-independent modulation of osteoclastogenesis. J Oral Biosci. 2019 Mar;61(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.job.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
Kokorovic A, So AI, Serag H, French C, Hamilton RJ, Izard JP, Nayak JG, Pouliot F, Saad F, Shayegan B, Aprikian A, Rendon RA. Canadian Urological Association guideline on androgen deprivation therapy: Adverse events and management strategies. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Jun;15(6):E307-E322. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7355. No abstract available.
Bhowmik D, Song X, Intorcia M, Gray S, Shi N. Examination of burden of skeletal-related events in patients naive to denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonate therapy in bone metastases from solid tumors population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Mar;35(3):513-523. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1532884. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-SR-999
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.