High Intensity Interval Training in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (UPPA-FH)
NCT ID: NCT06833944
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-15
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
a) To assess the impact of two different supervised exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with Familiar Hipercolesterolemia (FH), and to unravel the underlying mechanisms behind these effects.
The starting hypothesis of the UPPA-FH project anticipates that both exercise interventions will produce a large increase in cardiorespiratory fitness and will improve significant markers of atherosclerosis in patients with FH, with high-intensity interval training program (HIIT) being more efficient than the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) modality. The main effects will be mediated by a significant change in the metabolomic signature of the participants. In addition, higher physical activity will be associated with more favorable markers of atherosclerosis progression, as shown through blood and image technique
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Short-term, Home-based, High-intensity Interval Training (HIT) for Improving Fitness
NCT03473990
Can 2 Weeks of High Intensity Interval Training in Healthy 65-85 Year-olds Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness?
NCT03331679
HIT in the Healthy Elderly Population
NCT02167191
Effects of Low-volume Aerobic Interval Training in Overweight Individuals at Increased Cardiometabolic Risk
NCT03306069
High-intensity Interval Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Women
NCT03300895
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypercholesterolemia is one of the main vascular risk factors (VRF) related to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), mainly myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, the main causes of global mortality in the past decades. It is important to note that patients with FH present an increased prevalence of CVD at a very early age (44 years on average) and, in comparison to the general population, patients with FH have a 13.2 times higher risk of developing atherosclerotic CVD; specifically, up to 50% of men and 30% of women with FH will suffer an MI before the age of 60. Atherosclerosis is a complex process that involves endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, or oxidative stress. The presence of atherosclerosis can be assessed with positron emission tomography (PET), which has shown a high ability to predict the development of atherosclerotic plaque and cardiovascular events even after the consideration of classic VRF, so it is used as a method of early diagnosis of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with chronic proinflammatory diseases. Therefore, the use of PET along with various plasma markers of inflammation in patients with FH (including C-reactive protein, \[CRP\], interleukin 10 \[IL10\], oxidized LDL \[oxLDL\], and the intracellular adhesion molecule 1 \[ICAM1\]), could allow the detection of atherosclerotic disease in the very early stages. Consequently, understanding novel markers that allow early identification of subclinical atherosclerosis, as well as strategies for reducing the VRF associated with FH, are key targets in these patients.
The treatment of hypercholesterolemia is primarily based on pharmacological therapies such as statins, ezetimibe, and monoclonal antibodies, which can decrease LDL cholesterol levels by up to 60%. However, the rate of achieving LDL cholesterol targets set by clinical practice guidelines is low (30-40%) due to poor tolerance to high doses of statins and other reasons. Importantly, new risk factors such as chronic vascular inflammation and oxidative stress are now considered in the etiology of atherosclerotic CVD beyond LDL cholesterol levels. Consequently, new treatment approaches are needed to address the treatment of FH as an important public health concern.
For all the above, unraveling the role of potential protective factors and interventions that might significantly improve the cardiometabolic profile and reduce the risk of morbi-mortality in this population, as well as the mechanisms involved, is of wide clinical and public health interest.
The UPPA-FH project will unravel the role of physical activity and different exercise interventions on critical health markers in men and women with FH and will study the mechanisms by which these effects are produced. For instance, whether the effects of exercise are mediated by changes in the metabolomic signature related to blood lipids will be explored. This will enable i) international institutions to develop clinical guidelines including exercise as a first-line treatment for the management of FH and ii) to unravel (for the first time) the potential mechanisms behind the effects of exercise in this population.
Physical activity and physical fitness are strong markers of health that are positively and strongly associated with survival in the general population and in patients with CVD. However, the role of physical activity on markers of atherosclerosis progression, inflammation, endothelial function, and other CVD risk factors in patients with FH has not been explored and would provide a framework for targeted physical activity promotion interventions. Similarly, CRF is associated with a better lipid profile, lower rates of pro-atherosclerotic VRF (hypertension, diabetes), and less subclinical atherosclerosis in different populations and is associated with a lower risk of death from all causes and a lower risk of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). CRF has also been shown to be a better predictor of mortality than other traditional vascular risk factors (VRF), such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, smoking, or type 2 diabetes. In men with hypercholesterolemia, higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with up to 45% lower risk of CVD mortality, independent of other clinical risk factors, which underscores the importance of CRF in the primary prevention of CVD in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Therefore, exploring the value of CRF as a marker of health in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and how exercise interventions can improve CRF is of high scientific and clinical value.
Although exercise interventions can reduce inflammation, oxidative stress and improve endothelial function in different populations and is a cost-effective therapy with similar benefits to pharmacological treatment in reducing CV and all-cause mortality, its effects in patients with FH have not been addressed before. The UPPA-FH will unravel the role of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiorespiratory fitness and the course of atherosclerosis in men and women with FH. These interventions have proved to be effective in improving CRF and improve CVD risk factors, and HIIT has been shown to be a time-efficient intervention that increases adherence due to the limited amount of time needed and the clinically relevant benefits in patients with and without CVD. HIIT protocols also improve anthropometric, metabolic, and vascular function in people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, coronary disease, obesity, or the general population. Furthermore, HIIT has been shown to be safe in patients with high CV risk, such as those with coronary disease and heart failure, when developed in supervised environments.
Unlocking how physical activity and fitness impact the development of atherosclerosis and the unique metabolomic signature of men and women with FH is a key goal of this proposal. But we're not stopping there. The UPPA-FH project goes one step further to uncover the specific effects of different exercise interventions and regimens on key health markers for FH, such as cardiorespiratory fitness and atherosclerosis, and to understand the underlying mechanisms for these benefits. This proposal has the potential to make breakthrough discoveries that will pave the way for future interventions and for developing clinical guidelines, including exercise recommendations for FH patients, which are currently lacking.
The novelty of this proposal relies on discovering the extent to which exercise can improve key health parameters in FM patients, which is currently unknown. The clinical guidelines for these patients lack specific information on physical activity and exercise, which limits the ability of the health care system to benefit this population. Based on evidence on many similar populations, it can be affirmed that exercise has a huge potential to improve critical markers in patients with FH. Another novelty of the UPPA-FH study is to unravel the mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise, including inflammatory markers, oxidative stress and the metabolomic signature. Finally, also a novelty of this study will be to address the safety of moderate and high intensity exercise in this special population of high CV risk by providing detailed information about the adverse effects of the interventions; the lack of adverse effects reporting in exercise trials is a very common issue that this study will clearly address. All in all, through a highly collaborative y multidisciplinary research approach team and design, this study will contribute to improve the current management of FH patients, and will allow to understand the reasons why exercise is beneficial in this genetic condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) intervention program
The HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 74 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax).
HIIT intervention program
The HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 18 weeks (a total of 74 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The program will be divided into two phases: phase 1 (adaptation to HIIT training: during the first 4 weeks, the intensity will be progressively increased to ensure the safety and progressive physical conditioning of the patients.
The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale33 and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax). This protocol has been widely applied and is safe in general and in clinical populations. Additionally, this protocol includes the training parameters recently proposed in a recent meta-analysis to maximize the training effects of HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness (primary outcome).
Moderate Intensity Continous Training (MICT) intervention program
The MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 74 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group
MICT intervention program
The MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 18 weeks (a total of 74 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group.
Each session will include 3 parts: warm-up (5 min), main MICT workout (34 min), and a cool-down (5 min). Warm-up will include mobility, core, and aerobic exercise involving major muscle groups. The main workout (MICT) will include exercises involving major muscle groups using the same materials and rationale as commented on in the HIIT group. The cool-down phase will include aerobic exercise at a lower intensity, stretching, and relaxation exercises (RPE\<11). The highest and average HR and RPE for each session will be registered.
Control group
The control group will follow a usual care regime during the intervention and will not participate in supervised exercise. However, the participants randomized to this group will be invited to participate in a similar intervention once the study is completed (waiting list control group).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HIIT intervention program
The HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 18 weeks (a total of 74 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The program will be divided into two phases: phase 1 (adaptation to HIIT training: during the first 4 weeks, the intensity will be progressively increased to ensure the safety and progressive physical conditioning of the patients.
The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale33 and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax). This protocol has been widely applied and is safe in general and in clinical populations. Additionally, this protocol includes the training parameters recently proposed in a recent meta-analysis to maximize the training effects of HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness (primary outcome).
MICT intervention program
The MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 18 weeks (a total of 74 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group.
Each session will include 3 parts: warm-up (5 min), main MICT workout (34 min), and a cool-down (5 min). Warm-up will include mobility, core, and aerobic exercise involving major muscle groups. The main workout (MICT) will include exercises involving major muscle groups using the same materials and rationale as commented on in the HIIT group. The cool-down phase will include aerobic exercise at a lower intensity, stretching, and relaxation exercises (RPE\<11). The highest and average HR and RPE for each session will be registered.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \> 18 years old.
* Minimum follow-up of 1 year in the Vascular Risk Clinic of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (HUVN).
* Clinical and treatment stability.
* Non-pathological angio-TAC of coronary arteries in the 5 years prior to the study (for participants \>45 years old).
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications to exercise.
* History of clinical CVD (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and/or peripheral arterial disease).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
José Antonio Vargas Hitos
José A. Vargas-Hitos, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose A Vargas-Hitos, MD, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
Alberto Soriano Maldonado, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidad de Almeria
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
Granada, Granada, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PID2022-142844OB-I00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.