Which Model of Care is the Most Cost-effective in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disorders?

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

369 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-31

Study Completion Date

2028-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

As musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) reach epidemic proportions in Canada, access to the public health system for those who suffer from them is increasingly difficult. One of the main barriers is the delays to see a publicly funded health professional. New models of care must therefore be developed to ensure better access. We have previously shown that not all patients with a MSKD need to be closely followed by a health professional as for a large proportion of patients simply educating them is enough to resolve their MSKD. A stepped care model where education would be given first before deciding if patients need a more extensive follow-up should be explored. This project will compare the effectiveness of a Stepped Care Model to that of the two most widely used models of care: Usual Medical Care and Usual Rehabilitation Care. We think that a Stepped Care Model will be as effective to reduce functional limitations, but will lead to lower healthcare costs.

Adults (n=369) with a MSKD will be randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups: Stepped Care, Usual Medical Care (physician-led intervention: e.g., advice/education, pharmacological pain management), or Usual Rehabilitation Care (physiotherapist-led intervention: e.g., advice/education, exercises). Participants in the Stepped Care Group will take part in two education sessions during the first 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, those who still have clinically important symptoms will receive follow-up rehabilitation interventions, while those who don't will be considered recovered and will have no further intervention. Primary (functional limitations) and secondary (e.g., pain, quality of life) outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks, and costs estimate will be established for each model of care. Knowing the urgent need for an overhaul of services to reduce wait times, the Stepped Care Model proposed could be a solution to improve access to health services without compromising quality of care.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Testing the Feasibility of Intervening to Optimize Chiropractic Care for Adults With Neck Pain Disorders

NCT02483091

Neck Pain

COMPLETED PHASE1

Efficacy of a Remotely Administered Functional Capacity Test on Return-to-work Outcomes

NCT05370872

Low Back Disorder Shoulder Disease Musculoskeletal Injury

COMPLETED NA

Triaging Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders Directly to Physiotherapists at Primary Health Care Clinics.

NCT02218749

Musculoskeletal Disorders

TERMINATED NA

Manual Therapy and Augmented Exercise for Neck Pain

NCT01750736

Neck Pain

COMPLETED NA

Manual Therapy and Physical-sport Performance

NCT06871202

Healthy Musculoskeletal Disorders

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are a leading cause of global disability, pain and work disability. Even if they are not fatal, they are disabling and their care places a significant burden on the healthcare system. Knowing that early intervention improves clinical outcomes, the healthcare system must ensure that those affected have access to the care they need, which is currently not the case. Optimizing the use of resources through the development of innovative and effective interventions must therefore be addressed. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted by our team, we have demonstrated that not all patients with MSKDs need to be closely followed by a health professional as for a large proportion of patients simply educating them is enough to resolve their MSKD. As healthcare costs escalate, using a Stepped Care Model in which patient education is offered first, providing usual care only to those whose symptoms have not resolved might lead to more efficient healthcare use and lower costs. The primary objective of this RCT is to establish the effectiveness of a new model of care for MSKDs by comparing a Stepped Care Model to the two most widely used models of care: Usual Medical Care and Usual Rehabilitation Care. A secondary objective will be to compare the costs associated with each of these care models. We hypothesize that a Stepped Care Model will be as effective as Usual Medical and Rehabilitation Care to reduce functional limitations, but will lead to lower costs.

In this pragmatic parallel-group RCT, 369 adults presenting a MSKDs will be randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups: 1) Stepped Care, 2) Usual Medical Care (physician-led intervention \[up to 3 appointments within 12 weeks\]: e.g., advice/education, pharmacological pain management), 3) Usual Rehabilitation Care (physiotherapist-led intervention \[up to 10 appointments within 12 weeks\]: e.g., advice/education, exercises). During the first 6 weeks of the study, participants in the Stepped Care Group will take part in a self-management education program that includes two education sessions with a physiotherapist; after 6 weeks, those still experiencing clinically important symptoms will receive follow-up rehabilitation interventions (up to 5 sessions within 6 weeks), while those not experiencing clinically important symptoms will be considered recovered and will have no further intervention. The primary (functional limitations) and secondary outcomes (e.g., pain severity, health-related quality of life, pain-related fear, pain self-efficacy), assessed at baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 weeks, will be compared between the groups using repeated measures analyses (linear mixed models). Costs estimate from the public payer and patient perspective will be established (including incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios) and compare between care models (one-way ANOVA). Our research team has all the expertise (health services organization, medicine, rehabilitation, biostatistics, health economics) necessary to carry out this project. Knowing the urgent need for an overhaul of services to reduce wait times and ensure equitable access, the Stepped Care Model proposed could be a solution to improve access to health services without compromising quality of care. If the results are conclusive, they would lay the foundation for a future pan-Canadian trial examining the benefits of implementing such a model into the public healthcare system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Neck Pain Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome Rotator-cuff Related Shoulder Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Given that for the type of intervention provided, it is impossible to blind the care provider and participants, only the statistician and outcome assessors will be blinded. All groups will be treated in different clinics to reduce potential contamination: Usual Medical Care in FP Clinics and the Stepped Care and the Usual Rehabilitation Care in different PT clinics.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stepped Care Group

During the first 6 weeks, participants will take part in a self-management education program and will be offered two individual educational sessions provided by a physiotherapist (PT). At the 6-week follow-up evaluation, the score on a region-specific patient-reported outcome measure will be used to determine if the condition is resolved or unresolved. Those no longer experiencing clinically important symptoms at the 6-week follow-up will be considered resolved and will have no further intervention. Those with remaining clinically important symptoms will receive follow-up interventions by a PT with up to 5 sessions over 6 weeks. The rehabilitation program will be similar to the one received by the participants in the Usual Rehabilitation Care Group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stepped care

Intervention Type OTHER

During the first education session, participants will be provided with information pertaining to painful area, basic pain science, injury specific advice on load management, pain and activity management, lifestyle factors and physical activity. A general physical activity will be recommended (150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week). Then, participants will be directed to a website developed by the research team and patient partners. The website includes explanations of the various topics discussed during the session , explanatory videos, and summarized information. During the second educational session, the participant's condition will be reviewed, and their understanding of the topics covered in the first session and on the website will be assessed. A follow-up on the website will also be conducted. The physiotherapist will then answer the participant's questions and provide personalized advice based on their condition, along with long-term recommendations.

Usual Rehabilitation Care Group

Participants will take part in a pragmatic 12-week physiotherapist (PT)-led rehabilitation program. It will include a maximum of 10 supervised meetings of 30 minutes each and an individualized home exercise program of 20-30 minutes to be performed 3-4 times per week.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rehabilitation Care

Intervention Type OTHER

The pragmatic rehabilitation program will include exercises aimed at improving strength, endurance, flexibility, capacity to sustain mechanical load and dynamic control. Manual therapy may be provided during the sessions, based on pragmatic clinical decision-making. Participants will also receive information pertaining to the painful area and advice on pain and load management, and on activity modification, integrated across the sessions.

Usual Medical Care Group

Participants will take part in a 12-week family physician (FP)-led program based on best practices and CPGs. It will include a maximum of 3 meetings over 12 weeks with a FP.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Medical Care

Intervention Type OTHER

The pragmatic medical intervention may include pharmacological management, education, physiotherapy referral or referral to a specialist as deemed necessary.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stepped care

During the first education session, participants will be provided with information pertaining to painful area, basic pain science, injury specific advice on load management, pain and activity management, lifestyle factors and physical activity. A general physical activity will be recommended (150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per week). Then, participants will be directed to a website developed by the research team and patient partners. The website includes explanations of the various topics discussed during the session , explanatory videos, and summarized information. During the second educational session, the participant's condition will be reviewed, and their understanding of the topics covered in the first session and on the website will be assessed. A follow-up on the website will also be conducted. The physiotherapist will then answer the participant's questions and provide personalized advice based on their condition, along with long-term recommendations.

Intervention Type OTHER

Rehabilitation Care

The pragmatic rehabilitation program will include exercises aimed at improving strength, endurance, flexibility, capacity to sustain mechanical load and dynamic control. Manual therapy may be provided during the sessions, based on pragmatic clinical decision-making. Participants will also receive information pertaining to the painful area and advice on pain and load management, and on activity modification, integrated across the sessions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Medical Care

The pragmatic medical intervention may include pharmacological management, education, physiotherapy referral or referral to a specialist as deemed necessary.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* present with one of the four targeted MSKDs (low back pain, neck pain, anterior knee pain, rotator cuff-related shoulder pain).
* have had pain for at least 6 weeks.
* For low back pain (LBP): 1) non-specific LBP with or without radiation to the lower limbs, 2) minimal score of 15 on the ODI.
* For neck pain : 1) non-specific neck pain with or without radiation to the upper limbs, 2) minimal score of 21 on the NDI.
* For anterior knee pain : 1) anterior knee pain during walking, running or going up or down stairs, or during at least two activities among: kneeling, squatting, and resisted knee extension, 2) maximum score of 79 on the KOS-ADL.
* For rotator cuff-related shoulder pain : 1) minimal score of 15 on the QuickDASH, and 2) shoulder pain attributed to a rotator cuff-related shoulder pain using diagnostic guidelines of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unavailable to participate during the 24 weeks of the study.
* Do not understand French or English.
* Diagnosis of rheumatoid, inflammatory or neurodegenerative diseases.
* Received a corticosteroid injection in the previous 3 months.
* Cognitive problems interfering (Mini-Mental State Examination ≥ 24).
* Received a corticosteroid injection in the previous 3 months.
* Less than 6 weeks since an intervention for their condition (including performing prescribed condition-specific exercises or taking prescribed medication).
* For low back pain (LBP): 1) LBP related to specific conditions (e.g., vertebral fracture, infections, neuropathic pain \[\>4 at the DN4 questionnaire\]), 2) history of spine surgery or signs of upper motor neuron lesions (bilateral paresthesia, hyperreflexia or spasticity)..
* For neck pain : 1) neck pain related to specific conditions (e.g.; vertebral fracture, infections, neuropathic pain \[\>4 at the DN4 questionnaire\]), 2) history of spine surgery or signs of upper motor neuron lesions.
* For anterior knee pain : 1) history of knee surgery or patellar dislocation, 2) pain believed to originate either from meniscus or from any knee ligament.
* For rotator cuff-related shoulder pain : 1) history of shoulder surgery, dislocations, fractures or capsulitis, 2) full thickness rotator cuff tear identified by imagery or clinical tests (lag signs and gross weakness).

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No