Are We Providing Timely Access to Musculoskeletal Outpatient Therapy Services? an Exploratory Study
NCT ID: NCT06829875
Last Updated: 2025-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
135 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-02-04
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
People in Wales waiting for care for their musculoskeletal problems are deemed to be cared for in good time if they get an appointment in less than 14 weeks. This target has been set by Welsh Government, for everyone who waits, no matter what condition they are waiting with and how that condition is affecting them.
We know that impact of wait for people with MSK problems can vary, from complete recovery, to worsening of their pain and function. The impact experienced seems to be influenced by factors such as their age and their mental health statusz\\. This suggests that setting one target for all may not be the right thing to do. However, we don't yet know whether waiting over 14 weeks has a big effect on impact. We also don't know about the lived experience of those waiting, while they wait, despite knowing that learning this is vital to informing change.
We plan to study the impact of waiting for these services by asking those waiting to complete a survey that measures the impact of their msk problem, at the start and end of their wait, and then understanding how the scores correlate with length of time waited. We will also ask some of these people to document their experience as they wait. We hope that this will provide an understanding of how effective the current target is at measuring access to these services, and whether we need to think differently. People will be able to complete this work in their own home.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Which Model of Care is the Most Cost-effective in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disorders?
NCT06832852
Applying an Osteopathic Intervention to Improve Mental Health Symptoms: a Mixed-methods Feasibility Study Protocol.
NCT05674071
Central Sensitization in Patients Seeking Outpatient Physical Therapy Services
NCT05467592
Protocol of Accelerated Rehabilitation Following Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT03719807
Do Physiotherapy Techniques Improve Posture During Admission for a Chest Infection in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis?
NCT00806884
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Literature exploring impact with wait is lacking when considering many areas of health, for example musculoskeletal conditions. However, such services are also duty bound to report their waiting times to Welsh Government.
Outpatient MSk Therapy Services, for example, report how long each person waits before an initial appointment is offered, in number of weeks. An appointment offered within 14 weeks of referral is considered 'timely' and people waiting over this time are considered to be 'breaching'. How this target became to be considered significant is not publicly justified. The impact of those waiting over 14 weeks on the person waiting, is not known.
Impact exploring those waiting for treatment for musuculoskeletal disorders is extremely limited. However, preliminary, retrospective study during COVID-19 suggests that those waiting for these services during this time, experienced a diversity of impact, from symptom recovery to deterioration of condition. The variables observed differed between individuals, as opposing to differing lengths of wait, and seemed to be influenced by personal factors such as socioeconomic and mental health status. This provides an insight that impact of wait is variable between individuals and does not align with current study of accessibility subjecting all people to the same arbitrary target without knowing what happens around this time. We know that future health and social care services need to be sustainable for the NHS to survive. We know that we need to look at things differently, considering the quality of the care that is provided rather than the quantity, and we are duty bound to explore how the NHS is doing with respect to quality, using both qualitative and quantitative information, involving all stakeholders. We know that this is vital to inform positive system change. However, there is no current exploration into the experience of waiting for MSk services, in the eyes of the waiter, as they wait.
Understanding this may help us to understand what a future model of MSk Outpatient healthcare should look like with respect to accessibility, and implement a sustainable solution for future generations. This is assuming that our current understanding of wait is inadequate, or not appropriate, based on the information available communicating accessibility through use of an arbitrary, unjustified blanket target for all, which remains an unknown.
This research project aims to understand the impact of chronological wait for people waiting for Musculoskeletal Therapy Outpatient Services, with reference given to under and over 14 weeks, to understand if the current target is effective at communicating how we are doing in this domain. It will also explore the lived experience of waiting in the eyes of the waiter, and seeks to understand whether this understanding aligns with what we see when studying impact of wait chronologically, with a view to provide a quality rich understanding of the impact of waiting for these services, and provide a direction of travel for future study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
service users entering waiting lists for outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy, podiatry and OY
wait for outpatient appointment
this is an observational study measuring impact of pain and function at start and end of wait for those waiting for care from outpatient physiotherapy occupations therapy and podiatry
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
wait for outpatient appointment
this is an observational study measuring impact of pain and function at start and end of wait for those waiting for care from outpatient physiotherapy occupations therapy and podiatry
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have entered a waiting list for outpatient podiatry, occupational therapy or physiotherapy with a musculoskeletal complaint
* able to provide informed consent
* be able to read and write english
Exclusion Criteria
* exhibit additional communication needs, to include but not limited to, language barrier
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cardiff University
OTHER
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sara P James, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiff and Vale University Healthboard
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
8851
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.