Effect of Joint Mobilization in the Treatment of Chronic Ankle Instability

NCT ID: NCT01438905

Last Updated: 2018-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of a gentle pressure movement performed at the ankle by a physical therapist on muscle function and ankle motion in individuals who frequently twist (sprain) their ankle.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Novel rehabilitation methods, that specifically target decreased muscle activation due to joint pathology prior to strength training, have elicited greater improvements in muscle function and self-reported disability compared to traditional therapies. Preliminary evidence suggests ankle joint mobilization can improve contributions of spinal influences on ankle muscle activation in individuals with ankle joint pathology, but there is a considerable gap in understanding cortical contributions to muscle activation following joint injury. It is unknown how joint mobilization concurrently affects cortical and spinal neural motor pathways, as well as clinical measures of patient function. The overall aim of this grant is to determine the immediate effects of talocrural joint mobilization on cortical and spinal muscle activation of the fibularis longus (peroneus) and soleus muscles in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). The secondary aims of this study will examine changes in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and dynamic balance. This innovate approach will provide the necessary scientific knowledge regarding the potential mechanism and efficacy of joint mobilization.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Sprain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Parameters will be identical to the lower intensity (Small amplitude oscillation mobilization; Grade IV) talocrural mobilization. No force, other than light hand contact will be applied by the therapist.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Lower intensity mobilization

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will stabilize the distal tibia with one hand and make contact the anterior talus with the opposite hand. Three 60-second anterior to posterior joint mobilizations of the talus (small amplitude at end range; Grade IV) will be applied by the therapist with one minute rest in between sets.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Small amplitude (Grade IV) mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will stabilize the distal tibia with one hand and make contact the anterior talus with the opposite hand. Three 60-second anterior to posterior joint mobilizations of the talus (small amplitude at end range; Grade IV) will be applied by the therapist with one minute rest in between sets.

Higher intensity mobilization

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will grasp the dorsum of the foot with their fingers. The ankle will be dorsiflexed until the restrictive barrier is reached. A small amplitude, quick thrust at end of range (High velocity, low amplitude; Grade V mobilization/manipulation) will be applied. If joint cavitation is not felt or heard by the therapist or subject the technique will be repeated one additional time.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High velocity, low amplitude (Grade V) mobilization

Intervention Type OTHER

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will grasp the dorsum of the foot with their fingers. The ankle will be dorsiflexed until the restrictive barrier is reached. A small amplitude, quick thrust at end of range (High velocity, low amplitude; Grade V mobilization/manipulation) will be applied. If joint cavitation is not felt or heard by the therapist or subject the technique will be repeated one additional time.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Small amplitude (Grade IV) mobilization

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will stabilize the distal tibia with one hand and make contact the anterior talus with the opposite hand. Three 60-second anterior to posterior joint mobilizations of the talus (small amplitude at end range; Grade IV) will be applied by the therapist with one minute rest in between sets.

Intervention Type OTHER

High velocity, low amplitude (Grade V) mobilization

The subject will be in a seated position and the therapist will grasp the dorsum of the foot with their fingers. The ankle will be dorsiflexed until the restrictive barrier is reached. A small amplitude, quick thrust at end of range (High velocity, low amplitude; Grade V mobilization/manipulation) will be applied. If joint cavitation is not felt or heard by the therapist or subject the technique will be repeated one additional time.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Manipulation Grade V mobilization High velocity, low amplitude thrust

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 16-45 years
* History of one or more ankle sprains
* Scoring at least an 85% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sport or at least 3 on the Modified Ankle Instability Instrument (AII).
* At least 5° ankle dorsiflexion asymmetry compared to the contralateral limb OR ankle dorsiflexion ROM less than 21°

Exclusion Criteria

* Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months (including lateral ankle sprain)
* Diagnosed ankle osteoarthritis
* History of ankle surgery that involves intra-articular fixation
* Medical conditions which would be contraindications to mobilization/manipulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation, including cardiac pacemaker, metal implants in the head, current pregnancy, neurological disorders, recent use of stimulants or medications known to lower seizure threshold, and personal or family history of seizures
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nebraska Foundation for Physical Therapy

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Creighton University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Terry L Grindstaff, PhD, PT, ATC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Creighton University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Creighton University

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grindstaff TL, Dolan N, Morton SK. Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion influences Lateral Step Down Test scores in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Jan;23:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27662790 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11-16058

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.