The Using of NEurocryostimulation in Military Ankle Sprains

NCT ID: NCT01716871

Last Updated: 2012-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: The military population is at high-risk for injury with by painful sprains, especially of the ankle. The referenced treatment method for pain is the cryotherapy, consisting in applying cold-packs to the injured ankle several times a day. However, another pain treatment has been developed and is commonly used by high-level sports teams and rheumatologists but its efficacy has never been assessed within a military population, i.e. the hyperbaric CO2 cryotherapy, also called the neurocryostimulation.

Research design: This study was carried out on a French multicenter basis, the study consisting in a randomized controlled superiority trial and open-label prospective analysis in the treatment of 40-year-old military patients or younger suffering from acute ankle sprains. Two groups were made: patients were treated either by neurocryostimulation or by the referenced cryotherapy (cold-packs). The care protocol for both groups consisted in six supervised 30 minute-sessions within a period of three consecutive days.

Hypothesis: Neurocryostimulation is more effective in the treatment of pain severity resulting from an ankle sprain than the referenced treatment by cold-packs. Moreover, we theorized that the total consumption of paracetamol and the number of days of temporary inaptitude and of work exemption were lower in patients treated by neurocryostimulation.

Outcomes:

For each session, pain severity is assessed on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale at the beginning and at the end of session 20 minutes later after a four-step walk.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In France, there is one ankle sprain per 10,000 person/day mainly as a result of athletic practice. The military population is one of the most physically active populations due to taking part in sports exercise, scheduled sports periods and leisure sports , or required military exercise which increase the soldiers' risk for injury to the lower extremity, especially the ankle. The incidence rate for ankle sprain injuries among all -active-duty US service members was 34.95 per 1000 person/year , thus more than 5 times greater than previously reported in civilian studies reported in the literature. These are among the two first leading causes of sports and physical training related hospitalizations among the U.S. Army population.

Sprains can lead to numerous consequences in the long-term in physical restrictions such as, ankle instability, risk of recurrence, but also absenteeism from work and/or participation in sports and chronic pain. A more efficient treatment seems to be necessary in preventing such troubles.

The usual care protocol for ankle sprains (RICE protocol) involve the cryotherapy (usually a cold-pack (R) applied directly to the injury several times a day with no existing undesirable effects).

An innovative treatment method, the neurocryostimulation, developed by Cluzeau and a French Company in 1993, gained rapid and wide-spread use among physiotherapists, rheumatologists, and athletes.It would provide a powerfull anti-inflammatory, myorelaxant and analgesic effect but contradictory results are shown in literature. Demoulin et al. aimed to assess the efficacy of neurocryostimulation following total knee arthroplasty compared to routinely used strategies for applying cold therapy, but didn't show significant differences regarding pain severity, mobility and perimetric measures. However, a pilot study led in Switzerland, comparing the pain reported by patients after an acute post-operative knee arthroscopy, has shown a pain differential higher in the neurocryostimulation than in the referenced cryotherapy (2.2 versus 0.5). And, Chatap et al. showed in a prospective study that pain scores decreased significantly after four sessions in elderly patients with acute or chronic pain.

At this day, No study has proved the efficacy of neurocryostimulation versus cold packs in pain resulting from an ankle sprain . A better treatment of the ankle sprain could reduce pain and , in the same time, also reduce the consumption of analgesics, the time of temporary inaptitudes and of work exemptions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sprain of Lateral Ligament of Ankle Joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cryotherapy using Cold pack®

patients with lateral ankle sprain who have been randomized in the "cold packs®" group.

Application of cryotherapy with Cold pack® or ice-cubes pack in the sprained ankle during 20 minutes 4 times a day, 3 days long.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cryotherapy with Cold pack® or ice-cubes pack

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients receive 2 controlled applications a day (one in the morning and one in the evening) of cryotherapy with Cold pack® or ice-cubes pack (with average dimensions of 5 cm by 8 cm) to the injury site for a duration of 20 minutes. Furthermore, the patients are instructed to do 2 more applications of the ice-pack during the daytime to follow the usual recommendations.

The first and last sessions of each day must be supervised by the medical care Unit to insure standardized data collection for each group.

cryotherapy using Neurocryostimulation

Patient with lateral ankle sprain randomized in the "neurocryostimulation" group.

Application of neurocryostimulation with Duo-cryo® device during 1 minute on the sprained ankle, 2 times a day, 3 days long

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

neurocryostimulation with Duo-cryo® device

Intervention Type DEVICE

organized in the morning and in the evening during 3days. The gaz is sprayed with Duo-cryo® device on dry skin over the ankle using a slow, regular, sweeping movement. The tip of the nozzle is kept 15 to 20 cm away from the skin. Neurocryostimulation is applied to patients for a duration of one minute by a trained staff

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

neurocryostimulation with Duo-cryo® device

organized in the morning and in the evening during 3days. The gaz is sprayed with Duo-cryo® device on dry skin over the ankle using a slow, regular, sweeping movement. The tip of the nozzle is kept 15 to 20 cm away from the skin. Neurocryostimulation is applied to patients for a duration of one minute by a trained staff

Intervention Type DEVICE

cryotherapy with Cold pack® or ice-cubes pack

Patients receive 2 controlled applications a day (one in the morning and one in the evening) of cryotherapy with Cold pack® or ice-cubes pack (with average dimensions of 5 cm by 8 cm) to the injury site for a duration of 20 minutes. Furthermore, the patients are instructed to do 2 more applications of the ice-pack during the daytime to follow the usual recommendations.

The first and last sessions of each day must be supervised by the medical care Unit to insure standardized data collection for each group.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

hyperbaric gazeous cryotherapy neurocryostimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

age equal or less than 40 years-old, military subject, acute ankle injury, To have completed and signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

contraindications to cryotherapy ( cold allergy, cryoglobulinemia, Raynaud's phenomenon, cutaneous sensory abnormalities, and diabetes mellitus), paracetamol allergy, 4th grade sprains according to the Trevino Classification (with bone wrenching), to take analgesic or anti-inflammatory treatment other than paracetamol.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolas Vertu

Interne des Hôpitaux des Armées

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolas VERTU, Interne

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées

Denis LAGAUCHE, Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées

Alain COURTIERE, Pharmacien

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

DCSSA

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

CREDORC

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +33387562427

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

courtiere Alain, PHD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-A00111-40

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Lagauche 2011-RC-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id