Influence of Sensory Electrical Stimulation on Hand Functions in Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT06826976
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-01
2025-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Group (A): Received SENS combined with task-specific training.
Control Group (B): Received only task-specific training.
Assessments conducted before and after the intervention included measurements of grip strength, pinch strength, wrist range of motion, and performance on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Sensory Electrical Stimulation Versus Alternating Electromyogram (EMG) On Functional Recovery Of Hand in Chronic Stroke Survivors :Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06836596
Sensory Stimulation to Enhance Hand Function Post Stroke
NCT02675764
Electrical Stimulation to Improve Hand Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke
NCT00023569
Neuroplasticity With Daily Use of a Sensorimotor Priming Vibration System to Improve Hand Function After Stroke
NCT04026399
Electrical Stimulation Combined With Motor Training on EEG-EMG Coherence and Motor Function in Individuals With Stroke
NCT03277534
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Group (A): Received SENS combined with task-specific training.
Control Group (B): Received only task-specific training.
Assessment Methods:
Before and after the intervention, both groups underwent evaluations using:
Grip Dynamometer: To measure grip strength.
Pinch Dynamometer: To assess pinch strength.
Digital Goniometer: To determine wrist flexion and extension range of motion.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): To evaluate upper limb functional performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Study Group (A): Received SENS combined with task-specific training.
Control Group (B): Received only task-specific training.
This design facilitated a direct comparison between the two groups to assess the added benefit of incorporating SENS into the rehabilitation program.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sensory electrical stimulation
received sensory electrical stimulation and task specific training program
sensory electrical stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation on median, ulnar, and radial nerves of affected upper limb, simultaneously with Task Specific Training program which included four subtests of Action Research Arm Test scale.
Task specific training
received task specific training program only. Patients were tested pre and post treatment by Grip dynamometer, Pinch dynamometer, Digital goniometer and Action Research Arm Test Scale (ARAT).
task specific training program
received task specific training program only. Patients were tested pre and post treatment by Grip dynamometer, Pinch dynamometer, Digital goniometer and Action Research Arm Test Scale (ARAT).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sensory electrical stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation on median, ulnar, and radial nerves of affected upper limb, simultaneously with Task Specific Training program which included four subtests of Action Research Arm Test scale.
task specific training program
received task specific training program only. Patients were tested pre and post treatment by Grip dynamometer, Pinch dynamometer, Digital goniometer and Action Research Arm Test Scale (ARAT).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age range: 40 to 65 years old.
* Duration of illness: 30 to 180 days since stroke onset.
* Spasticity of the affected hand muscles (wrist flexors, finger flexors, and finger adductors) must be grade 1+ or less according to the Modified Ashworth Scale.
* Hand dysfunction severity ranges from mild to severe, defined by a score of ≤ 4 on the Medical Research Council Scale.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of a lower motor neuron lesion in the impaired upper extremity (e.g., polyneuropathy) before the stroke.
* Skin abrasions or ulcerations on the affected upper limb.
* Unstable health conditions, including cardiac dysfunction, end-stage renal failure, unstable diabetes, or uncontrolled hypertension (\>190/110).
* Presence of a pacemaker or other implanted electrically sensitive devices.
* Significant orthopedic conditions or chronic pain syndromes.
* Chronic use of medications that may influence motor or sensory excitability (e.g., anti-epileptic or antipsychotic drugs).
* Pregnancy.
40 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Islam Hassan Fayed
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Giza, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P.T. REC/012/005208
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.