Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Intraoperative Ventilation Practices in Western Canada
NCT ID: NCT06821139
Last Updated: 2025-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
28700 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-01-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* In this population, what is the general compliance rate to lung protective ventilation
* In this population, what are the predictors of compliance before/after the COVID-19 pandemic.
This is a retrospective study using linked patient data from two databases in the health region: the anesthesia informational management system for intraoperative data, and the electronic medical record for perioperative data.
Rationale for study:
Breathing problems after surgery affect 5% to 33% of patients and can lead to serious issues like lung infections, breathing failure, and longer hospital stays, with up to a 20% risk of death within 30 days for serious cases. A proven way to reduce these risks is lung protective ventilation (LPV), a technique used during surgery where the ventilator delivers smaller breaths based on clinical guidelines and calculated using a person's ideal body weight, while applying gentle pressure to keep the lungs slightly open. While this approach has been widely adopted in intensive care units over the past 20 years, it's less commonly used in operating rooms, with fewer than half of surgeries using it. Barriers include suboptimal default ventilator settings, patients at extremes of weight, and misunderstandings of LPV among clinicians. During the COVID-19 pandemic, LPV use increased for patients with COVID-related lung problems, showing improved survival rates in ICUs. However, it's unclear if this practice carried over to surgical patients at-large or continued after the pandemic. Most studies on LPV during surgery have been conducted outside Canada, where healthcare practices and education may differ from within Canada. To address these gaps, the investigators aim to study LPV use during surgery in a large Canadian health system, identify factors that influence its use, and examine trends during and after the COVID pandemic. This research will help improve patient care by promoting the use of this effective technique in Canadian operating rooms.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Surgery
NCT01601223
Intraoperative Lung Protective Ventilation in Czech Republic
NCT07282899
The Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic Among Operated Patients
NCT04525716
Ventilation in Cardiac Surgery
NCT03255356
Cerebral Oxymeter and End Tidal Carbondioxide Values Under Surgical Drapes With and Without Past COVID-19 Infection
NCT05571683
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pre-COVID cohort
Before January 2020. The investigators considered before January 2020 as the pre-COVID era, and after June 2020 as the COVID era. The former cutoff was chosen as January 2020 contained the first COVID case in British Columbia, the province containing the study sites. The latter cutoff was chosen as it constitutes three months after March 2020, when the World Health Organization (WHO) announced COVID's pandemic status, and British Columbia announced a state of emergency with the start of isolation policies. The investigators hypothesized that any impact of the COVID pandemic on lung protective ventilation practice patterns would unlikely to have occurred prior COVID's arrival in BC, but would likely be in full swing three months after initiation of widespread social isolation, a very palpable event in society.
No interventions assigned to this group
New normal cohort
After June 2020. The investigators considered before January 2020 as the pre-COVID era, and after June 2020 as the COVID era. The former cutoff was chosen as January 2020 contained the first COVID case in British Columbia, the province containing the study sites. The latter cutoff was chosen as it constitutes three months after March 2020, when the WHO announced COVID's pandemic status, and British Columbia announced a state of emergency with the start of isolation policies. The investigators hypothesized that any impact of the COVID pandemic on lung protective ventilation practice patterns would unlikely to have occurred prior COVID's arrival in BC, but would likely be in full swing three months after initiation of widespread social isolation, a very palpable event in society.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* underwent general anesthesia with endotracheal tube placement for a procedure lasting ≥30 minutes.
* included in both our clinical anesthesia record database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, and linkable by usual identifiers (name, date of birth, medical record number, personal health number, date of surgery)
Exclusion Criteria
* cardiothoracic surgery
* organ donation surgery
* organ transplant recipient
* Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
* surgical procedure related to an occurrence or complication of prior procedure during the same admission/within 30 days,
* multiple NSQIP assessed cases within 30 days only for same patient
* cases in clinical anesthesia record database that are unable to be linked to NSQIP data or vice versa.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Perseus Missirlis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Perseus Missirlis
Clinical instructor, staff anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Perseus Missirlis, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fraser Health Authority
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bender SP, Paganelli WC, Gerety LP, Tharp WG, Shanks AM, Housey M, Blank RS, Colquhoun DA, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Jameson LC, Kheterpal S. Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Trends and Practice Patterns: A Report from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1231-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000940.
Parks DA, Short RT, McArdle PJ, Liwo A, Hagood JM, Crump SJ, Bryant AS, Vetter TR, Morgan CJ, Beasley TM, Jones KA. Improving Adherence to Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Strategies Using Near Real-Time Feedback and Individualized Electronic Reporting. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1438-1449. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005481.
Blum JM, Maile M, Park PK, Morris M, Jewell E, Dechert R, Rosenberg AL. A description of intraoperative ventilator management in patients with acute lung injury and the use of lung protective ventilation strategies. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):75-82. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8d63.
Kim SH, Na S, Lee WK, Choi H, Kim J. Application of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation varies in accordance with the knowledge of anaesthesiologists: a single-Centre questionnaire study and a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0495-7.
Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, Migliarese J, Ragains C, Trethewey B, Woodward A, Gama de Abreu M, Girard M, Futier E, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Sprung J. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
Guay J, Ochroch EA, Kopp S. Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in adults without acute lung injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011151.pub3.
Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H20-01683
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FHREB 2020-083
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.