Enhancing Difficult Laryngoscopy Prediction Through A Mixed Scoring System

NCT ID: NCT06815952

Last Updated: 2025-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-20

Study Completion Date

2026-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to develop a comprehensive airway assessment score including traditional bedside clinical tests and ultrasound measurements with high accuracy in predicting difficult airway, and to validate it through testing it on a large population sample. The main question it aims to answer is: Is the comprehensive scoring system that includes clinical bedside and ultrasound measurements developed to predict difficult airways valid in a large population sample? Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-4 will be recruited. Traditional and ultrasound measurements will be collected.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ability to predict a difficult airway is the cornerstone of avoiding its dreaded complication. To standardize the task of airway assessment, multiple scores have been developed and subsequently validated, such as the Wilson risk sum score, El-ghanzouri risk index, Arne risk index…Despite utilizing these tools, there are situations in which subjects classified as easy airways surprisingly present with challenging airways. This has raised the need for developing and validating newer airway assessment scores, that include quantitative ultrasound measurements. This study aims to develop a comprehensive airway assessment score including traditional bedside clinical tests and ultrasound measurements with high accuracy in predicting difficult airway, and to validate it through testing it on a large population sample. After obtaining the consent from patients to participate in the study, the day before the surgery in the PAU or patients' rooms, a member of the research team with experience in ultrasound, will collect the required data either in the preoperative unit or in the patient room the day before the surgery (for admitted patients). The traditional metrics collected are: Modified Mallampati score, inter-incisor distance, upper lip bite test, the maximum range of head and neck movement, neck circumference, thyromental distance, receding mandible, buck teeth, edentulousness, presence of beard, and sternomental distance and the ultrasound measurements collected are a distance from skin to epiglottis (DSE), hyomental distance (HMD), the ratio of hyomental distance in maximal head extension to hyomental distance in neutral position (HMDR), tongue thickness (TT), the ratio of pre-epiglottic distance to the epiglottic distance at the midpoint of the VC (Pre-E/E-VC), distance from skin to the hyoid bone (DSHB), and distance from skin to vocal cords (DSVC). After induction, the level of difficulty of laryngoscopy will be collected by a member of the research team. For clinical and sonographic criteria with statistical significance, the investigators will calculate their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. To determine the quantitative variable cut-off, the investigators will establish the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics). After checking that the area under the curve (AUC) is significantly \>0.7, the investigators will choose as the cut-off, the value of the variable that corresponds to the best "sensitivity-specificity" pair. Finally, to identify independent criteria associated with difficult laryngoscopy, the investigators will perform multivariable analysis by logistic regression. These independent predictive criteria are the score parameters defined by values corresponding to their respective odd ratios. Then the investigators establish the cutoff value of the score from its ROC curve. As the patients in this study are almost all Lebanese or Arab, potential bias and influencing factors must be considered when the models are used for patients in other countries. Also, this is a single institution study, a multicenter and multiracial study is needed to develop a score that can be widely used internationally.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Laryngoscopy Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-4
* Emergency or elective cases

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with confirmed history of difficult airway
* Patients with maxillofacial trauma or cervical spine injury or instability
* Pregnant patients
* Patients with a history of head and neck cancer
* Patients with known subglottic stenosis
* Patients requiring a double lumen tube insertion
* Patients with a history of neck radiotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American University of Beirut Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nancy Abou Nafeh

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nancy Abou Nafeh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Beirut, , Lebanon

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Lebanon

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nancy Abou Nafeh, MD

Role: CONTACT

Thouraya HajAli

Role: CONTACT

01350000 ext. 5738

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nancy Abou Nafeh

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIO-2024-0255

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.