Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03547193

Last Updated: 2018-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-05

Study Completion Date

2017-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation.

The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between the sonographic measurements of anterior cervical soft tissues's thickness and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy in patients with normal clinical screening tests.

Design: Prospective, single blinded, observational study. Number of patients: 300 adult patients Methods: All patients are assessed before surgery to evaluate clinical evidence of difficult airways. Simultaneous ultrasound measures of the anterior cervical soft tissues are performed.

At induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist, blinded to the ultrasound assessments.

Statistical analysis:

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) are used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test is employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p \< 0.05 are considered as statistically significant.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty, especially if difficult ventilation occurs, during standard laryngoscopy, remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Accurate airway assessment should always be performed, but the common clinical screening tests have shown low sensitivity and specificity with a limited predictive value. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful, simple, bedside and non-invasive tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation and these are mostly limited on specific groups of patients.

The aim of this prospective, single blinded, observational study is to determine the correlation between two neck ultrasound measures assessed at the pre-operative visit and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy, assessed at the induction of anaesthesia 24 hours later.

METHODS: During the pre-operative visit (24 hours before surgery), clinical screening tests to predict a difficult airway are performed and the anterior cervical soft tissue's thickness is assesses.

The thickness of the anterior cervical soft tissues is measured at two levels, thyro-hyoid membrane (pre-epiglottis space) and vocal cords (laryngeal inlet), using a US probe 10-13-MHz linear transducer placed in the transverse plane with the patient's head in neutral position.

On each level the distance from the skin in the median axis in cm (mDSE = median distance skin to epiglottis; mVC = median distance skin to vocal cords) and the surrounding Area in cm2 (PEA = pre-epiglottis area; AVC = Area pre vocal cords) are measured.

At the induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist blinded to the ultrasound assessments and with more than 5 years of experience with OR activity. For each patient it's considered only the best attempt at direct laryngoscopy obtained after optimizing position, complete muscle relaxation (TOF=0), and, if necessary, external laryngeal manipulation. A decrease of SpO2 \< 92% is a criterion for abandoning the procedure and a maximum of three attempts are admitted before declaring intubation failure with direct laryngoscopy. A Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2a are classified as easy laryngoscopy and grade 2b - 3a - 3b or 4 as restricted or difficult laryngoscopy.

STATISTICAL ANALISYS: According to the literature, ultrasound measurements should predict as difficult at least 80% of the intubations that are really difficult (with a C-L ≥ 2b). Since the incidence of difficult intubation is about 5-10% of all intubations 1-3,6, it is necessary to study at least 244 patients in order to obtain statistically significant differences between the two groups accepting an alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test is used to test the normality of distribution. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) is used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test are employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p \< 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

ETHICS: Ethical approval for this study was provided by Marche's Regional Ethics Committee (CERM), Ancona, ITA (Protocol No. 2016-0405); Chairperson: Prof Marcello D'Errico on 23 March 2017. Informed written consent was obtained. The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Airway Complication of Anesthesia Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients undergoing pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Predicted difficult intubation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Università Politecnica delle Marche

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abele Donati, MD

Study Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abele Donati, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UNIVPM, University of Ancona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona - Università Politecnica delle Marche

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Falcetta S, Cavallo S, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Sorbello M, Zdravkovic I, Donati A. Evaluation of two neck ultrasound measurements as predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):605-612. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000832.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29889671 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-0405

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.