A Study Comparing Two Mandibular Advancement Devices in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea
NCT ID: NCT06810479
Last Updated: 2025-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-20
2026-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patiënt will test the first MRA for 3 months, after a wash out period of 2 weeks they will test the second MRA for 3 months. It will be randomised what type of MRA will be tested first and second.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinial Study of Treatment With Mandibular Advancement Device in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across 6 General Hospitals
NCT06837285
Self-Reported Versus Objective Measured Compliance With Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome
NCT01284881
PROMAD: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT01532050
Validation of Functional Imaging as Predictive Tool for Outcome of Mandibular Replacement Appliance Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome Patients
NCT01524510
Effects From a Mandibular Repositioning Appliance in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring
NCT00477009
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Mandibular repositioning appliances (MRAs) can be either custom-made or universal. Custom-made devices, which are typically more expensive, are fabricated in a dental laboratory using dental impressions. In contrast, prefabricated devices, often thermoplastic MRAs, are generally less costly and readily available over the counter.
Mandibular repositioning appliances (MRAs) can be classified as non-titratable, also known as monoblock devices, which have a fixed position, or titratable devices, which allow for gradual adjustment of the mandibular position until the desired therapeutic effect is achieved. Current guidelines recommend the use of titratable MRAs.
Titratable mandibular repositioning appliances (MRAs) can be further categorized into two types: midline traction devices, where the upper and lower components are connected at the front of the device, and bilateral thrust devices, where the upper and lower components are linked in the lateral or (pre-)molar regions.
Within the latter category, various designs exist, including devices that are adjustable on both sides using Hyrax screws and 3D-printed devices equipped with a series of lower components that allow for adjustments in mandibular position.
An example of an MRA adjustable with Hyrax screws is the SomnoDent® device (SomnoMed, Denton, Texas, USA). An example of a device utilizing a series of lower components for titration is the OrthoApnea appliance (ORTHOAPNEA S.L., Málaga, Spain), which features a specific attachment mechanism.
Although studies have already been published comparing different types of "bilateral thrust" devices, no studies to date have directly compared the categories mentioned above. The hypothesis of the investigators is that both appliances have similar effectiveness in the treatment of mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea.
Primary objective:
Improvement of AHI, measured by polygraphy before treatment and after treatment with each MRA.
Secondary objective;
* Peripheral oxygen saturation, measured by polygraphy before treatment and after treatment with each MRA
* Average saturation
* Lowest saturation
* Oxygen desaturation index \>3% (events/h)
* Total duration with saturation \< 90%
* Epworth Sleepiness Scale, taken before treatment and after treatment with each MRA
* Patient experience questionnaire, taken before treatment and after treatment with each MRA
* Patient final choice of preferred MRA
Endpoints:
The investigators assess the objective improvement in OSA by comparing polygraphy results taken before and after treatment with each MRA. To evaluate the subjective effects of the MRA, the investigators compare the scores from the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The participants subjective experience with each MRA type is measured using a patient experience questionnaire, along with noting the final preference for device type of the participants.
Study design:
* Randomized, controlled cross-over study
* Study population: Patients referred to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at ZOL Genk for Mandibular Repositioning Appliance (MRA) therapy, aged 18 years or older diagnosed with an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) between 5 and 30 events per hour.
Inclusion criteria:
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
* Provide signed and dated informed consent
* Males or females aged 18 and above
* Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) between 5 and 30 events per hour diagnosed by a polysomnography
Exclusion criteria:
A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
* Previous surgery on the upper airways
* Prior treatment of OSA (CPAP or MRA)
* Presence of unstable cardiovascular conditions, neurological, mental, or psychiatric disorders
* Insufficient dental or periodontal condition for a mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA)
* Presence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MRA1MRA2
Use of MRA device 1 for 3 months, use of MRA device 2 for 3 months
Polygraphy
Polygraphy will be caried out at the patients home to evaluate each MRA after 3 monhts
Questionaire
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
o Johns, Murray W. "A New Method for Measuring Daytime Sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale." Sleep, vol. 14, no. 6, 1991, pp. 540-545.
Questionaire
Patient experience questionnaire
o Ng, E.T., Perez-Garcia, A., en Lagravère-Vich, M.O. "Development and Initial Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Patient Experience with Oral Appliance Therapy." Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 19, nr. 8, 1 aug. 2023, pp. 1437-1445. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10562. PMID: 37082817; PMCID: PMC10394373
Question
Patient final choice of preferred MRA
MRA2MRA1
Use of MRA device 2 for 3 months, use of MRA device 1 for 3 months
Polygraphy
Polygraphy will be caried out at the patients home to evaluate each MRA after 3 monhts
Questionaire
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
o Johns, Murray W. "A New Method for Measuring Daytime Sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale." Sleep, vol. 14, no. 6, 1991, pp. 540-545.
Questionaire
Patient experience questionnaire
o Ng, E.T., Perez-Garcia, A., en Lagravère-Vich, M.O. "Development and Initial Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Patient Experience with Oral Appliance Therapy." Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 19, nr. 8, 1 aug. 2023, pp. 1437-1445. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10562. PMID: 37082817; PMCID: PMC10394373
Question
Patient final choice of preferred MRA
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Polygraphy
Polygraphy will be caried out at the patients home to evaluate each MRA after 3 monhts
Questionaire
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
o Johns, Murray W. "A New Method for Measuring Daytime Sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale." Sleep, vol. 14, no. 6, 1991, pp. 540-545.
Questionaire
Patient experience questionnaire
o Ng, E.T., Perez-Garcia, A., en Lagravère-Vich, M.O. "Development and Initial Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Patient Experience with Oral Appliance Therapy." Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 19, nr. 8, 1 aug. 2023, pp. 1437-1445. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10562. PMID: 37082817; PMCID: PMC10394373
Question
Patient final choice of preferred MRA
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Males or females aged 18 and above
* Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) between 5 and 30 events per hour diagnosed by a polysomnography
A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
* Previous surgery on the upper airways
* Prior treatment of OSA (CPAP or MRA)
* Presence of unstable cardiovascular conditions, neurological, mental, or psychiatric disorders
* Insufficient dental or periodontal condition for a mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA)
* Presence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ng ET, Perez-Garcia A, Lagravere-Vich MO. Development and initial validation of a questionnaire to measure patient experience with oral appliance therapy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Aug 1;19(8):1437-1445. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10562.
Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5. doi: 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540.
Zhou J, Liu YH. A randomised titrated crossover study comparing two oral appliances in the treatment for mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Dec;39(12):914-22. doi: 10.1111/joor.12006. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
Vezina JP, Blumen MB, Buchet I, Hausser-Hauw C, Chabolle F. Does propulsion mechanism influence the long-term side effects of oral appliances in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing? Chest. 2011 Nov;140(5):1184-1191. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3123. Epub 2011 May 26.
Shi X, Lobbezoo F, Chen H, Rosenmoller BRAM, Berkhout E, de Lange J, Aarab G. Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2013-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04945-z. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
Lawton HM, Battagel JM, Kotecha B. A comparison of the Twin Block and Herbst mandibular advancement splints in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a prospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2005 Feb;27(1):82-90. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjh067.
Uniken Venema JAM, Rosenmoller BRAM, de Vries N, de Lange J, Aarab G, Lobbezoo F, Hoekema A. Mandibular advancement device design: A systematic review on outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea treatment. Sleep Med Rev. 2021 Dec;60:101557. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101557. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
Schmidt-Nowara W, Lowe A, Wiegand L, Cartwright R, Perez-Guerra F, Menn S. Oral appliances for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep. 1995 Jul;18(6):501-10. doi: 10.1093/sleep/18.6.501.
Dieltjens M, Vanderveken O. Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Nov 8;7(4):141. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040141.
Almeida FR, Lowe AA. Principles of oral appliance therapy for the management of snoring and sleep disordered breathing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Nov;21(4):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2009.07.002.
Ramar K, Dort LC, Katz SG, Lettieri CJ, Harrod CG, Thomas SM, Chervin RD. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring with Oral Appliance Therapy: An Update for 2015. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Jul 15;11(7):773-827. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4858.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Z-2025010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.