Clinial Study of Treatment With Mandibular Advancement Device in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across 6 General Hospitals
NCT ID: NCT06837285
Last Updated: 2025-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
182 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-22
2024-10-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: Diagnosis at 6 Belgian recognised OSA sleepcenters with type-1 polysomnography. After drug-induced sleep endoscopy by Ear-Nose-Troat-specialist, patients with positive effect of mandibular protrusion on reopening the upper airway were referred. The mandibular advancement device (MAD) was fitted in 'maximal comfortable protrusion' minus 2mm. A type-3 home polygraphy with MAD followed titration.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Additional Titration During Oral Appliance Treatment for Sleep-disordered Breathing.
NCT01666886
Evaluation of the Cardiovascular Effects of the MAS in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT02320877
A Study Comparing Two Mandibular Advancement Devices in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea
NCT06810479
PROMAD: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT01532050
Phenotypic Characteristics of Responders to Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Using Mandibular Advancement Devices
NCT05596825
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Ear-Nose-Troat-specialist at the OSA sleep center performed an awake examination of the upper airway, followed by a drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). Patients with positive effect of mandibular protrusion on reopening of the upper airway were referred to the dental sleep professional (DSP) for dental clinical and/or radiological examination. The DSP registered the mandibular protrusive trajectory with a bite registration device (The BiteFix, Scheu-Dental, Iserlohn, Germany) and a hard bite registration paste (Futar Fast, Kettenbach, Germany), as to achieve a stable fit on both tooth arcs. Next, the 'maximal comfortable protrusion' (MCP, mm) of the mandible was determined, being the most forward mandibular protrusion still tolerated by the patient and tested during DISE.
At the time of fitting, the patients received full explanation on the MAD titration schedule and were instructed to titrate after fitting of the MAD till resolution of the snoring symptoms or upon reaching physiological limits. A 1-month follow-up was performed by telephone. Next, a type 3 home polygraphy with the MAD was organized between 3 to 5 months after treatment start, recording identical parameters as at baseline, making each patient to serve as the own control.
Inclusion In Belgium, the reimbursement criterion for MADt leaves out central apneas in the calculation of AHI and requires this 'obstructive AHI' (OAHI) to be ≥ 15 events/h. In the absence of any central event, the OAHI = AHI, whereas in the presence of central events OAHI \< AHI. Patients with OAHI ≥ 15 events/h and therefore AHI ≥ 15 events/h were included on the condition that the full clinical pathway as described before was followed and that the MAD was self-reportedly used at least 4 hours per night. Further reporting is done on AHI, for reasons of comparison with other studies.
Parameters Age (years) and gender (Male/Female, M/F) were noted. Questionnaires were used at baseline and controls for the quantification of snoring using a visual analogue score on loudness (VAS-snore) with a Likert-scale from 0 (no snoring) up to 10 (partner sleeps in other room). A VAS-snore \> 3/10 represents socially disturbing snoring. The Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) quantifies daytime sleepiness with ESS ≥ 11/24 representing increased propensity to fall asleep during daytime.
Mandibular advancement device The starting position of the MADt was set at MCP minus 2mm (MCP-2, mm). Digital imprints of both tooth arcs were taken (Trios, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) as well of the bite-registration in the MCP-2 position. The selected MAD (EVO, ProSomnus Sleep Technologies, Pleasanton, CA, USA) uses a Class IV resin (United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary) which is the highest grade of material currently available. Its design is characterized by perpendicular rectangular posts to protrude the mandible. Such design could preserve mandibular advancement even during limited mouth opening while asleep. The fully digital manufacturing pathway, starting from the digital intra-oral scans up to the 3D milling, favors accuracy-of-fit on the dental arcs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mandibular advancement device
Results of clinical trials on MADs are regularly published in the international literature but are generally very strongly controlled studies, still far away from being applied in routine daily clinical practice. The current retrospective study evaluates real-world data to determine the extent to which MAD improves both symptoms in patients with OSA. It is estimated that about 3% of newly diagnosed OSA patients are treated with MAD. In the light of new future treatment conventions, health government departments are increasingly demanding real-world data to stimulate knowledge of the relative effectiveness and value of treatments in the management of patients in routine clinical settings.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* complete clinical pathway
Exclusion Criteria
* not dental fit
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AZ Sint-Maarten
UNKNOWN
AZ Voorkempen
UNKNOWN
AZ Monica Campus Antwerpen
UNKNOWN
Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden
OTHER
Vitaz
OTHER
Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Lier
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Antwerp
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Braem
em. prof. dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc J BRAEM, DDS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UZA Afd. Tandheelkunde
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AZ Voorkempen
Malle, Antwerpen, Belgium
Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
Bonheiden, Mechelen, Belgium
VITAZ
Sint-Niklaas, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
AZ Monica
Antwerp, , Belgium
Heilig Hartziekenhuis Lier
Lier, , Belgium
AZ Sint-Maarten
Mechelen, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EVO_AZ-Sites_2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.