Prospective Exploratory Study on rTMS for Migraine Under the Guidance of MEG
NCT ID: NCT06796725
Last Updated: 2025-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-06
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
rTMS for the Prevention Treatment of CM: a Single Arm Study
NCT03568617
Efficacy of Non-Invasive Neuromodulation on Pain in Migraine
NCT07081685
Closed-loop RTMS for Short-term Migraine Prevention
NCT06735768
Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Migraine
NCT01496950
Efficacy of rTMS in the Treatment of Patients With Migraine
NCT00316979
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RTMS intervention group
(1) The patient undergoes pseudo stimulus intervention in the first week and real stimulus intervention afterwards, which is blind to the patient. (2) Starting from the second week, true stimulation intervention will be conducted for 4 weeks, with each patient making an appointment for 1 month.
rTMS
(1) The patient undergoes pseudo stimulus intervention in the first week and real stimulus intervention afterwards, which is blind to the patient. (2) Starting from the second week, true stimulation intervention will be conducted for 4 weeks, with each patient making an appointment for 1 month. On Day 7 after the patient intervention, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 180 scales were used to evaluate follow-up.
Sibelium treatment group
Patients were evaluated and followed up with a scale based on medication intervention.
Sibelium
Sibelium 10mg is taken orally every night for 4 weeks each course of treatment. Patients were evaluated and followed up with a scale based on medication intervention, including Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTMS
(1) The patient undergoes pseudo stimulus intervention in the first week and real stimulus intervention afterwards, which is blind to the patient. (2) Starting from the second week, true stimulation intervention will be conducted for 4 weeks, with each patient making an appointment for 1 month. On Day 7 after the patient intervention, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 180 scales were used to evaluate follow-up.
Sibelium
Sibelium 10mg is taken orally every night for 4 weeks each course of treatment. Patients were evaluated and followed up with a scale based on medication intervention, including Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be able to swallow tablets
* Signed and dated informed consent form Promise to comply with research procedures and cooperate in implementing the entire research process
Exclusion Criteria
* Accompanied by fever; New onset headaches in adults, especially after the age of 50; Headaches in patients with high coagulation risk
* New headache in patients with tumor or AIDS history; Headaches related to changes in body position;
* History of epileptic seizures
15 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ruijin Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ruijin Hospital
Shanghai, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Teo WP, Kannan A, Loh PK, Chew E, Sharma VK, Chan YC. Poor Tolerance of Motor Cortex rTMS in Chronic Migraine. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):MM01-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9377.4886. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
Kalita J, Kumar S, Singh VK, Misra UK. A Randomized Controlled Trial of High Rate rTMS Versus rTMS and Amitriptyline in Chronic Migraine. Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):E733-E741.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Migraine-MEG-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.