Prospective Exploratory Study on rTMS for Migraine Under the Guidance of MEG

NCT ID: NCT06796725

Last Updated: 2025-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-06

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Using magnetoencephalography to locate and regulate targets in migraine patients, repeating transcranial magnetic stimulation to physically regulate targets, and evaluating the safety and effectiveness of this treatment method through headache related scales. Using whole genome data and scale scores for correlation analysis, and conducting randomized controls with traditional drugs to explore new approaches for migraine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Migraine patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two groups: the MEG+rTMS treatment group and the Sibelium treatment group. Evaluate the clinical efficacy (frequency of attacks (times/month), severity (visual analog scale), duration (d), analgesic drug use rate, and related scale scores) of the MEG+rTMS treatment group and the Sibelium treatment group, respectively. Evaluate its efficacy based on follow-up results and analyze the correlation between different genotypes and efficacy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine Disorders, Brain rTMS Stimulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
This study adopted a single blind approach, with evaluators being blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RTMS intervention group

(1) The patient undergoes pseudo stimulus intervention in the first week and real stimulus intervention afterwards, which is blind to the patient. (2) Starting from the second week, true stimulation intervention will be conducted for 4 weeks, with each patient making an appointment for 1 month.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rTMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

(1) The patient undergoes pseudo stimulus intervention in the first week and real stimulus intervention afterwards, which is blind to the patient. (2) Starting from the second week, true stimulation intervention will be conducted for 4 weeks, with each patient making an appointment for 1 month. On Day 7 after the patient intervention, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 180 scales were used to evaluate follow-up.

Sibelium treatment group

Patients were evaluated and followed up with a scale based on medication intervention.

Group Type OTHER

Sibelium

Intervention Type DRUG

Sibelium 10mg is taken orally every night for 4 weeks each course of treatment. Patients were evaluated and followed up with a scale based on medication intervention, including Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rTMS

(1) The patient undergoes pseudo stimulus intervention in the first week and real stimulus intervention afterwards, which is blind to the patient. (2) Starting from the second week, true stimulation intervention will be conducted for 4 weeks, with each patient making an appointment for 1 month. On Day 7 after the patient intervention, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 180 scales were used to evaluate follow-up.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sibelium

Sibelium 10mg is taken orally every night for 4 weeks each course of treatment. Patients were evaluated and followed up with a scale based on medication intervention, including Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, and Day 180

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Complies with specific disease diagnosis: A. Headaches that meet the criteria of B and C (headaches that meet the characteristics of tension headaches or migraines) should occur at least 15 days per month and last for at least 3 months; B. Headaches that meet the criteria of 1.1 migraine without aura diagnosis B-D or 1.2 migraine with aura B and C occurring at least 5 times; C. Headache meets any of the following criteria and occurs for more than 8 days per month, lasting for more than 3 months: ①1.1 C and D of migraine without aura②1.2 B and C of migraine with aura③ The migraine attack perceived by the patient can be relieved by taking triptan or ergot, which cannot be better explained by other diagnoses in ICHD-3.
* Must be able to swallow tablets
* Signed and dated informed consent form Promise to comply with research procedures and cooperate in implementing the entire research process

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 15 years old; Accompanied by optic disc edema, focal symptoms and signs of the nervous system (except for typical visual and sensory precursors) or cognitive impairment; Sudden and rapidly peaking severe headaches (thunderous headaches)
* Accompanied by fever; New onset headaches in adults, especially after the age of 50; Headaches in patients with high coagulation risk
* New headache in patients with tumor or AIDS history; Headaches related to changes in body position;
* History of epileptic seizures
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ruijin Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xiaodan Wang, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+86-21-64370045

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xiaodan Wang, Ph.D.

Role: primary

+86-21-64370045

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Teo WP, Kannan A, Loh PK, Chew E, Sharma VK, Chan YC. Poor Tolerance of Motor Cortex rTMS in Chronic Migraine. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):MM01-2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9377.4886. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25386478 (View on PubMed)

Kalita J, Kumar S, Singh VK, Misra UK. A Randomized Controlled Trial of High Rate rTMS Versus rTMS and Amitriptyline in Chronic Migraine. Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):E733-E741.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34554691 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Migraine-MEG-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.